Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Drawing skills form the foundation of your AP Art and Design portfolio, whether you're submitting 2-D Design or Drawing work. The College Board evaluates your mark-making, light and shade, and composition—and these aren't just technical checkboxes. They're looking for evidence that you can synthesize materials, processes, and ideas into cohesive works that demonstrate both skill and intentionality. Your Sustained Investigation requires 15 images showing practice, experimentation, and revision, which means you need a toolkit of techniques you can push, combine, and transform.
These techniques connect directly to core principles you'll be tested on: how observation informs creation, how materials influence interpretation, and how formal elements like value, line, and space communicate ideas. When you understand why a technique works—not just how to execute it—you can make deliberate choices that strengthen your written evidence and visual documentation. Don't just memorize these methods; know what concept each technique demonstrates and how it might serve your inquiry.
These methods train your eye to see accurately before your hand ever moves. The principle here is simple: drawing skill begins with perception, not execution.
Compare: Contour drawing vs. gesture drawing—both prioritize observation over detail, but contour slows you down to trace edges while gesture speeds you up to capture energy. Use contour when precision matters; use gesture when documenting movement or warming up for figure work.
Understanding how light behaves on form is essential for creating depth and dimension. These techniques translate three-dimensional reality onto a two-dimensional surface through tonal relationships.
Compare: Cross-hatching vs. stippling—both build value through accumulation rather than blending, but cross-hatching emphasizes directional energy while stippling creates more uniform, texture-free gradations. Cross-hatching works faster; stippling offers more precision.
These methods address surface quality—how something feels visually. The key principle: texture communicates material identity and adds tactile interest that engages viewers.
Compare: Blending vs. texture rendering—blending eliminates visible marks for smooth transitions, while texture rendering celebrates marks to describe surfaces. Your inquiry might explore tension between these approaches.
These techniques address how objects relate to each other and to the picture plane. The underlying principle: space is an active element, not empty background.
Compare: Perspective drawing vs. negative space drawing—perspective constructs space logically through geometry, while negative space reveals it through shape relationships. Use perspective for architectural accuracy; use negative space to strengthen abstract compositions.
These approaches apply drawing fundamentals to particular subjects, each with unique challenges. The principle: different subjects demand different observational priorities.
Compare: Figure drawing vs. still life—both develop observational skills, but figure drawing prioritizes gesture and anatomy while still life emphasizes arrangement and material rendering. Still life gives you control over setup; figure drawing requires responding to a living subject.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Observational training | Contour drawing, blind contour, gesture drawing |
| Value development | Value studies, shading techniques, cross-hatching |
| Mark-making variety | Stippling, cross-hatching, line weight variation |
| Surface description | Texture rendering, blending techniques |
| Spatial relationships | Perspective drawing, negative space, proportion and scale |
| Process documentation | Gesture drawing, value studies, blind contour |
| Subject application | Figure drawing, still life composition |
Which two techniques both build value through accumulation of marks rather than continuous tone, and how do their visual effects differ?
If your Sustained Investigation explores tension between control and spontaneity, which techniques would best demonstrate each quality in your process documentation?
Compare contour drawing and gesture drawing: what observational priority does each emphasize, and when would you choose one over the other?
A scorer notes "moderate drawing skills" in your portfolio. Which specific techniques from this guide would most directly demonstrate advanced mark-making, light and shade, and composition?
How might negative space drawing serve as a revision strategy when a composition feels unbalanced—and how would you document this experimentation in your written evidence?