Essential Concepts of Thermodynamic Cycles

Why This Matters

Thermodynamic cycles are the backbone of every engine, power plant, and refrigeration system you'll encounter—both on the AP exam and in the real world. Understanding these cycles means understanding how we convert heat into useful work (or move heat against its natural flow), which connects directly to the First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics, efficiency calculations, PV diagrams, and entropy. When you see a question about why no engine can be 100% efficient or how a refrigerator actually works, you're being tested on these fundamental cycles.

Here's the key insight: the exam doesn't just want you to identify cycle names. You need to understand what makes each cycle unique—the specific processes involved (isothermal, adiabatic, isobaric, isochoric) and how those processes determine efficiency. Don't just memorize facts—know what thermodynamic principle each cycle illustrates and be ready to compare cycles that share similar structures but serve different purposes.

---

Idealized Benchmark Cycles

These theoretical cycles establish the upper limits of what's thermodynamically possible. They represent perfect reversible processes that real engines can approach but never achieve.

Carnot Cycle

• Maximum theoretical efficiency—consists of two isothermal and two adiabatic reversible processes, setting the benchmark for all heat engines
• Efficiency formula $\eta = 1 - \frac{T_c}{T_h}$—depends only on the absolute temperatures of the hot and cold reservoirs
• No real engine achieves Carnot efficiency—irreversible processes, friction, and heat losses make this an unattainable ideal

Stirling Cycle

• External combustion with closed system—uses a fixed amount of working gas through two isothermal and two isochoric processes
• High efficiency at low temperature differentials—regenerative heat exchange recovers energy between processes
• Versatile heat sources—can operate on solar, geothermal, or waste heat, making it valuable for sustainable applications

Ericsson Cycle

• Similar to Stirling but with isobaric processes—two isothermal and two isobaric processes with regenerative heat exchange
• Theoretical efficiency equals Carnot—when regeneration is perfect, matching the ideal benchmark
• Primarily a theoretical model—less common in practice but important for understanding maximum efficiency limits

---

Internal Combustion Engine Cycles

These cycles power most vehicles and portable machinery. The key distinction is how heat is added—at constant volume (Otto) or constant pressure (Diesel).

Otto Cycle

• Gasoline engine cycle—heat addition occurs at constant volume (isochoric) after spark ignition
• Four processes: two adiabatic (compression/expansion) and two isochoric (heat addition/rejection)
• Efficiency depends on compression ratio $\eta = 1 - \frac{1}{r^{\gamma-1}}$—higher compression means better efficiency, but knock limits restrict practical values

Diesel Cycle

• Compression ignition cycle—fuel injected into highly compressed hot air ignites spontaneously at constant pressure (isobaric)
• Higher compression ratios than Otto—typically 14:1 to 25:1 versus 8:1 to 12:1, enabling greater thermal efficiency
• Better fuel economy, more torque—preferred for heavy-duty applications like trucks and ships

---

Power Plant Cycles

These large-scale cycles generate most of the world's electricity. They differ in working fluid (steam vs. gas) and whether phase changes occur.

Rankine Cycle

• Steam power plant cycle—water undergoes phase changes through isentropic expansion, isobaric heat addition/rejection, and isentropic compression
• Efficiency improved by superheating and reheating—raising steam temperature above saturation increases work output
• Dominates electricity generation—coal, nuclear, and solar thermal plants all use variations of this cycle

Brayton Cycle

• Gas turbine cycle—continuous flow of air through two adiabatic and two isobaric processes without phase change
• Efficiency depends on pressure ratio—higher compression of intake air yields better thermal efficiency
• Powers jet engines and peaker plants—high power-to-weight ratio makes it ideal for aviation and rapid-response electricity generation

---

Heat Transfer Cycles (Reversed Cycles)

These cycles move heat from cold to hot reservoirs—the opposite of heat engines. They require work input and are evaluated by coefficient of performance (COP), not efficiency.

Refrigeration Cycle

• Removes heat from cold reservoir—work input drives heat transfer from low to high temperature, opposing natural heat flow
• Coefficient of performance $COP_{ref} = \frac{Q_c}{W}$—measures cooling achieved per unit work input
• Four processes: isentropic compression, isobaric heat rejection (condenser), isentropic expansion, isobaric heat absorption (evaporator)

Heat Pump Cycle

• Same processes as refrigeration, different purpose—transfers heat into a warm space rather than out of a cold one
• COP for heating $COP_{hp} = \frac{Q_h}{W}$—always greater than 1, and equals $COP_{ref} + 1$ for the same cycle
• More efficient than direct heating—moves 3-4 units of heat energy per unit of electrical work input

Vapor Compression Cycle

• Practical implementation of refrigeration—refrigerant undergoes phase changes through compression, condensation, expansion, and evaporation
• Refrigerant choice affects performance—properties like boiling point and latent heat determine system efficiency
• Found in most cooling applications—refrigerators, air conditioners, and heat pumps all use this cycle

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Both the Carnot and Stirling cycles can achieve maximum theoretical efficiency—what type of process do they share, and what process differs between them?

2. An FRQ presents two engines: one adds heat at constant volume, the other at constant pressure. Which cycles are being described, and which typically achieves higher efficiency at the same peak temperature?

3. Compare the coefficient of performance for a refrigerator and a heat pump operating between the same two reservoirs. If $COP_{ref} = 4$, what is $COP_{hp}$?

4. A power plant engineer wants to exceed 50% thermal efficiency. Why might they combine Brayton and Rankine cycles, and what role does each cycle play?

5. The Carnot efficiency formula $\eta = 1 - T_c/T_h$ uses absolute temperatures. If a student incorrectly uses Celsius, would their calculated efficiency be too high or too low? Explain using the Second Law.