Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Camera movement isn't just about keeping things visually interesting—it's a storytelling language unto itself. Every pan, dolly, and tilt communicates something to your audience, whether that's spatial relationships, emotional states, power dynamics, or narrative focus. When you're analyzing cinematography, you need to understand not just what a movement looks like, but why a filmmaker chose it over other options. The difference between a dolly-in and a zoom might seem subtle, but it fundamentally changes how viewers perceive space and feel about characters.
Think of camera movements as falling into distinct categories based on their primary function: some movements reveal information, others follow action, and still others manipulate the viewer's psychological state. You're being tested on your ability to identify these techniques, explain their effects, and analyze why specific choices serve a film's themes. Don't just memorize the names—know what emotional or narrative problem each movement solves and when you'd deploy one technique over another.
These movements keep the camera fixed in one position while rotating on an axis. The camera acts like a human head turning to observe the world, creating a natural, observational perspective.
Compare: Pan vs. Tilt—both are pivot movements from a fixed position, but pan explores horizontal space (relationships across a room) while tilt explores vertical space (power, scale, revelation). An FRQ asking about spatial storytelling should reference both.
These techniques physically relocate the camera through space. Moving the camera changes perspective in ways that static pivots cannot, creating parallax and depth that immerse viewers in three-dimensional environments.
Compare: Dolly vs. Tracking—dolly moves the camera toward/away from subjects (-axis), while tracking moves alongside them (-axis). Both create parallax and immersion, but dolly manipulates emotional distance while tracking maintains consistent relationship during movement.
These techniques define themselves by how they handle camera stability. The choice between smooth and shaky movement is a choice about how much the audience should feel the camera's presence.
Compare: Steadicam vs. Handheld—both allow operator mobility, but they create opposite psychological effects. Steadicam's smoothness feels ethereal and controlled; handheld's shake feels urgent and raw. Choose based on whether you want viewers to feel safe or unsettled.
These techniques manipulate what the lens sees rather than physically moving the camera body. They alter perception of space and direct attention without changing the camera's position in the world.
Compare: Zoom vs. Dolly—this is a classic cinematography distinction. Both can make subjects larger in frame, but dolly maintains natural spatial relationships (parallax) while zoom compresses or distorts them. The "dolly zoom" (moving camera while zooming opposite) exploits this difference to create the famous Vertigo effect of disorientation.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Revealing spatial information | Pan, Tilt, Crane |
| Following subject movement | Tracking, Steadicam, Handheld |
| Manipulating emotional distance | Dolly, Zoom, Rack Focus |
| Creating psychological unease | Dutch Angle, Handheld, Zoom |
| Establishing scale/grandeur | Crane, Tilt, Dolly-out |
| Immersive following shots | Steadicam, Tracking |
| Documentary realism | Handheld |
| Directing attention within frame | Rack Focus, Zoom |
Both dolly and zoom can make a subject appear larger in frame—what visual difference distinguishes them, and how does this affect viewer perception of space?
Which two camera movements are pivot-based techniques from a fixed position, and what axis does each operate on?
Compare and contrast Steadicam and handheld: what do they share in terms of operator mobility, and how do their psychological effects on viewers differ?
If you wanted to convey a character's growing sense of power and dominance as they enter a room, which combination of movements might you use and why?
A filmmaker wants to shift audience attention from a character in the foreground to an object in the background without cutting—which technique accomplishes this, and what does it require the cinematographer to control precisely?