Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Material selection is one of the most consequential decisions in bridge engineering, directly affecting a structure's span capacity, service life, construction timeline, and lifecycle costs. You're being tested on understanding not just what materials exist, but why engineers choose specific materials for specific applications—considering factors like load requirements, environmental exposure, aesthetic goals, and maintenance constraints.
Don't just memorize material names and properties. Know what structural principle each material demonstrates: How does prestressing change concrete's behavior? Why do suspension bridges require cables instead of solid members? What trade-offs come with choosing timber over steel? These conceptual connections are what separate strong exam responses from simple recall.
These materials excel at resisting pulling forces, making them essential for suspended elements, cable systems, and reinforcement applications where tensile stress governs design.
Compare: High-strength cables vs. structural steel—both leverage steel's tensile strength, but cables work in pure tension while structural steel members handle combined bending, shear, and axial loads. If asked about material efficiency, cables represent the most direct load path.
Materials that excel under squeezing forces, ideal for columns, arches, and foundations where compressive stress dominates the structural behavior.
Compare: Stone vs. reinforced concrete—both excel in compression, but concrete's steel reinforcement allows it to handle tension and bending, enabling beam and slab designs impossible with unreinforced masonry. Stone remains superior for pure compression applications like arch rings.
These materials are specifically designed or modified to achieve enhanced structural properties beyond what conventional materials offer.
Compare: Prestressed vs. high-performance concrete—prestressing changes the stress state while HPC changes the material properties. They're often combined: prestressed HPC girders achieve the longest concrete spans. Exam questions may ask which approach addresses cracking (prestressing) vs. durability (HPC).
Materials selected specifically for their ability to withstand environmental degradation without protective coatings or with self-protecting mechanisms.
Compare: Weathering steel vs. aluminum—both offer corrosion resistance but through different mechanisms (controlled oxidation vs. passive oxide film). Weathering steel is economical for highway bridges in moderate climates; aluminum suits specialized applications where weight savings justify higher material costs.
Materials chosen for environmental benefits, specific performance characteristics, or innovative applications beyond traditional construction.
Compare: Timber vs. FRP composites—both offer sustainability advantages (renewable vs. durability-based), but timber suits traditional construction methods while FRP enables innovative designs. FRP's higher initial cost is offset by reduced maintenance in corrosive environments.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Tension resistance | High-strength cables, structural steel, FRP composites |
| Compression efficiency | Stone/masonry, concrete (all types) |
| Long-span capability | Prestressed concrete, high-strength cables, structural steel |
| Corrosion resistance | Aluminum, weathering steel, FRP composites |
| Self-weight minimization | Aluminum, FRP composites, timber |
| Durability/longevity | Stone, high-performance concrete, weathering steel |
| Sustainability | Timber, FRP composites (lifecycle-based) |
| Aesthetic applications | Stone, weathering steel, timber |
Which two materials rely on composite action between different components to achieve their structural properties, and what specific weakness does this combination address?
A bridge will span a tidal estuary with constant salt spray exposure. Compare the suitability of weathering steel versus aluminum for the primary structural members—which performs better and why?
Explain the fundamental difference between how prestressed concrete and high-performance concrete improve upon conventional reinforced concrete. Which addresses cracking through stress modification versus material enhancement?
If an FRQ asks you to recommend materials for a 500-meter cable-stayed bridge, which materials would you specify for the cables, towers, and deck respectively? Justify each choice based on the dominant stress type in that component.
Compare timber and FRP composites as sustainable material choices—what different sustainability strategies does each represent, and what project conditions would favor one over the other?