Essential Audio Mixing Techniques

Why This Matters

In audio and video reporting, your story is only as strong as your sound. Poor audio mixing can undermine even the most compelling footage—viewers will forgive shaky video before they'll tolerate muddy dialogue or jarring volume changes. You're being tested on your ability to make technical decisions that serve the narrative: knowing when to compress, why to cut certain frequencies, and how to balance competing audio elements so your audience stays engaged rather than reaching for the volume button.

These techniques represent the core toolkit every audio professional uses, from podcast editors to broadcast engineers. Understanding the signal flow (how audio moves through your system), frequency management (carving out sonic space), and dynamic control (taming volume extremes) will help you troubleshoot problems on deadline and make intentional creative choices. Don't just memorize what each tool does—know which problem each technique solves and when to reach for it.

---

Signal Flow and Level Management

Before you can shape your sound, you need clean, properly calibrated audio moving through your system. These foundational techniques prevent problems that no amount of post-production can fully fix.

Gain Staging

• Sets optimal signal levels throughout the audio chain—from microphone preamp to final output, preventing distortion before it happens
• Headroom is your safety margin; aim for peaks around $-12$ to $-6$ dB to leave room for transients and mixing adjustments
• Clipping (digital distortion from exceeding $0$ dB) is nearly impossible to fix, making proper gain staging your first line of defense

Leveling

• Balances volume across all tracks using faders to create a cohesive mix where every element sits properly
• Relative levels matter more than absolute—dialogue typically sits $3$–$6$ dB above ambient sound in most broadcast mixes
• Consistency throughout the piece ensures viewers don't constantly adjust their volume, keeping them focused on content

---

Frequency and Tone Shaping

Every sound occupies specific frequencies. Mixing is often about giving each element its own sonic real estate so nothing competes for the same space.

EQ (Equalization)

• Adjusts frequency balance by cutting or boosting specific ranges—human voice clarity lives primarily between $1$–$4$ kHz
• Subtractive EQ (cutting problem frequencies) generally sounds more natural than boosting; remove rumble below $80$ Hz for cleaner dialogue
• Creates separation in the mix by carving out space—if music and voice clash, cut competing frequencies rather than boosting everything louder

Noise Reduction

• Eliminates unwanted background sounds—HVAC hum, traffic, electrical buzz—that distract from your content
• Works by analyzing a "noise profile" and subtracting those frequencies; always capture a few seconds of "room tone" for this purpose
• Over-processing creates artifacts that sound worse than the original noise; use the minimum reduction necessary for acceptable clarity

---

Dynamic Control

Dynamics refer to the difference between loud and quiet moments. Broadcast and streaming platforms have limited dynamic range, requiring careful management of volume extremes.

Compression

• Reduces dynamic range by automatically lowering volume when signals exceed a threshold—essential for consistent broadcast levels
• Attack and release settings control how quickly compression engages; fast attack tames sharp transients, slow attack preserves punch
• Adds perceived loudness and presence without increasing peak levels, helping dialogue cut through background elements

Automation

• Creates dynamic changes over time—fading music under dialogue, emphasizing key moments, smoothing transitions
• More surgical than compression because you're making intentional, moment-by-moment decisions rather than applying blanket processing
• Essential for narrative flow in longer pieces; a well-automated mix guides emotional response without the audience noticing

---

Spatial and Environmental Effects

Sound exists in physical space. These techniques create the illusion of dimension and location, making audio feel natural and immersive.

Panning

• Positions sounds in the stereo field from left to right, creating width and separation in your mix
• Dialogue typically stays centered while ambient sounds and music can spread wider—this maintains focus on the speaker
• Guides listener attention by placing sounds where they'd naturally occur; a car passing should move through the stereo image

Reverb

• Simulates acoustic space by adding reflections that suggest room size and surface materials
• Matches audio to visual environment—a voice recorded in a studio can be made to sound like it's in a cathedral or small office
• Less is usually more in journalism; excessive reverb muddies dialogue intelligibility and sounds artificial

---

Integration and Finishing

The final stages bring everything together. These techniques ensure your mix works as a unified whole and translates across different playback systems.

Mixing Dialogue and Background Sound

• Dialogue intelligibility is paramount—background elements should enhance atmosphere without competing with spoken content
• Use EQ to separate frequencies (roll off low end on dialogue, cut midrange on ambience) and compression to keep levels consistent
• The "ducking" technique automatically lowers background when dialogue occurs, maintaining natural flow without constant manual adjustment

Mastering Basics

• Final polish before distribution—ensures consistent loudness, tonal balance, and compatibility across playback systems
• Loudness standards matter for broadcast (typically $-24$ LUFS for TV, $-16$ LUFS for streaming); exceeding these causes automatic limiting or rejection
• A/B testing on multiple speakers (headphones, phone, TV) reveals problems your studio monitors might miss

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Your dialogue sounds clear in isolation, but disappears when music plays underneath. Which two techniques would you combine to solve this, and why?

2. Compare and contrast compression and automation: In what situations would you choose one over the other for controlling dialogue levels in a documentary?

3. A field recording has consistent air conditioning hum throughout. Should you reach for EQ or noise reduction first? Explain your reasoning.

4. You're mixing an interview where the subject occasionally whispers and occasionally speaks loudly. Which technique ensures consistent volume without sounding unnatural, and what settings would you prioritize?

5. Your final mix sounds great on studio monitors but the dialogue becomes muddy on laptop speakers. Which stage of the workflow should have caught this problem, and what specific checks would prevent it?