Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Erosion isn't just about rocks breaking down—it's the fundamental force that sculpts every landscape you see, from the Grand Canyon to coastal cliffs to rolling hills. In Physical Geography, you're being tested on your ability to explain why landforms look the way they do, and erosion is almost always part of the answer. Understanding erosional processes means understanding the interplay between energy sources, material resistance, climate, and time—concepts that connect to nearly every other topic in the course.
The key insight here is that different agents of erosion (water, ice, wind, gravity, chemical reactions) each leave distinctive signatures on the landscape. When you see a U-shaped valley, you should immediately think "glacier." When you see a V-shaped valley, think "river." Don't just memorize a list of processes—know which agent creates which landforms, what conditions favor each type of erosion, and how these processes interact with human systems.
Physical weathering and related processes break rocks apart without changing their chemical makeup. The underlying principle is simple: apply enough force to exceed a rock's tensile strength, and it fractures.
Compare: Freeze-thaw vs. abrasion—both are physical weathering, but freeze-thaw works from within cracks while abrasion works on surfaces. If an FRQ asks about alpine landscape formation, mention both: freeze-thaw shatters peaks while glacial abrasion polishes valley floors.
Chemical weathering changes the mineral composition of rocks, often creating entirely new substances. Acidic water is the primary agent, breaking molecular bonds and dissolving minerals.
Compare: General chemical weathering vs. karst processes—both involve chemical dissolution, but karst specifically requires soluble bedrock (limestone, dolomite, gypsum). Karst creates dramatic subsurface features; other chemical weathering primarily affects surface soil development.
Fluvial erosion is the most widespread erosional process on Earth's land surfaces. Moving water erodes through hydraulic action (force of flow), abrasion (sediment grinding), and corrosion (chemical dissolution).
Compare: Fluvial erosion vs. hydraulic action—hydraulic action is a mechanism within fluvial erosion. Think of it this way: fluvial erosion is the overall process, while hydraulic action (along with abrasion and corrosion) is one of the tools rivers use. FRQs may ask you to explain how rivers erode—that's when you break out these specific mechanisms.
Glacial erosion operates slowly but with immense force. The sheer weight of ice (glaciers can be hundreds of meters thick) combined with embedded rock fragments makes glaciers extraordinarily effective erosion agents.
Compare: Glacial vs. fluvial erosion—both carve valleys, but the shape differs dramatically. Rivers create V-shaped valleys through downcutting; glaciers create U-shaped valleys through lateral and vertical erosion simultaneously. This is a classic exam comparison—know it cold.
Aeolian and coastal erosion dominate in specific environments where wind and water have unobstructed access to surfaces. Both processes are highly selective, preferentially removing fine materials and leaving resistant features behind.
Compare: Wind vs. coastal erosion—both operate at environmental margins (deserts, coastlines) and both are highly sensitive to climate. However, wind erosion is selective by particle size while coastal erosion attacks all materials through hydraulic force. Coastal erosion typically proceeds faster due to water's greater density and force.
Mass wasting moves material downslope under gravity's direct influence, without a transporting medium like water or ice. The key variables are slope angle, material cohesion, water content, and triggering events.
Compare: Mass wasting vs. other erosion types—mass wasting is unique because gravity alone provides the energy (no flowing water, ice, or wind required). This makes it possible anywhere slopes exist. If an FRQ asks about erosion in a specific location, consider whether slope instability could contribute—it often does.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Physical/mechanical breakdown | Freeze-thaw cycles, abrasion, physical weathering |
| Chemical dissolution | Karst processes, chemical weathering, hydrolysis |
| Water as erosion agent | Fluvial erosion, hydraulic action, coastal erosion |
| Ice as erosion agent | Glacial erosion (plucking, abrasion) |
| Wind as erosion agent | Aeolian processes (deflation, saltation) |
| Gravity-driven processes | Mass wasting (landslides, creep, mudflows) |
| Climate-sensitive processes | Freeze-thaw, coastal erosion, wind erosion |
| Processes creating underground features | Karst processes |
Which two erosional processes both use abrasion as a mechanism, and how does the abrasive material differ between them?
A landscape shows U-shaped valleys, sharp ridges, and bowl-shaped depressions at high elevations. Which erosional agent created these features, and what specific processes were involved?
Compare and contrast fluvial erosion and glacial erosion in terms of valley shape, erosion mechanisms, and the climate conditions that favor each.
Why does karst topography develop in some limestone regions but not others? What environmental conditions accelerate karst formation?
An FRQ asks you to explain why a coastal city faces increasing erosion risk. Which processes would you discuss, and what factors are intensifying them?