Why This Matters
The insurance industry has always evolved alongside society's risks, but the pace of change today is unprecedented. You're being tested on your ability to recognize how technological innovation, environmental shifts, and new business models create exposures that traditional insurance products weren't designed to cover. Understanding emerging risks isn't just about identifying what's new—it's about grasping why these risks challenge conventional underwriting, how they create coverage gaps, and what strategies insurers use to adapt.
These emerging risks share common characteristics: they're difficult to model with historical data, they cross traditional coverage boundaries, and they often involve systemic exposure that can affect multiple policyholders simultaneously. When you encounter exam questions about emerging risks, don't just memorize the list—know which risks share similar challenges (like modeling uncertainty) and which require fundamentally different solutions (like parametric triggers versus traditional indemnity). This conceptual understanding is what separates strong answers from surface-level recall.
Technology-Driven Risks
Digital transformation has created entirely new categories of loss exposure where the "peril" is often intangible—data theft, algorithmic error, or system failure—yet the financial consequences are very real.
Cyber Risks and Data Breaches
- Attack frequency and sophistication—cyberattacks now target businesses of all sizes, with ransomware, phishing, and supply chain attacks creating unpredictable loss patterns that challenge traditional actuarial models
- Financial and reputational damage—breach costs include forensic investigation, notification, credit monitoring, legal defense, and regulatory fines, often exceeding the direct theft losses
- Regulatory compliance requirements—laws like GDPR and state breach notification statutes create mandatory response obligations that shape minimum coverage needs
Artificial Intelligence and Autonomous Systems
- Liability attribution challenges—when an AI system or autonomous vehicle causes harm, determining fault among developers, deployers, and users disrupts traditional negligence frameworks
- Dual role in insurance—AI simultaneously creates new risks requiring coverage AND enhances insurers' ability to assess and price those risks through predictive analytics
- Regulatory uncertainty—evolving standards for AI accountability mean underwriters must price policies without clear legal precedent for how courts will assign liability
Internet of Things (IoT) Vulnerabilities
- Expanded attack surface—billions of connected devices create entry points for hackers, where a compromised smart thermostat can provide access to an entire corporate network
- Device security gaps—many IoT manufacturers prioritize functionality over security, leaving insureds with vulnerabilities they may not even recognize
- Cascading failure potential—interconnected systems mean a single breach can trigger business interruption, bodily injury, and property damage claims simultaneously
Compare: Cyber risks vs. IoT vulnerabilities—both involve digital security failures, but cyber policies traditionally focus on data and network intrusions while IoT risks blend cyber exposure with physical-world consequences like property damage or bodily injury. If asked about coverage gaps, IoT incidents often fall between cyber and general liability policies.
Environmental and Catastrophic Risks
Climate change and biological threats represent systemic risks where correlation among exposures is high—when one policyholder suffers a loss, thousands of others likely do too, challenging the fundamental insurance principle of risk pooling.
Climate Change and Extreme Weather Events
- Increasing loss severity—rising sea levels, intensifying hurricanes, and prolonged droughts are driving catastrophic losses beyond historical norms, invalidating backward-looking actuarial models
- Underwriting and pricing challenges—traditional rate-making relies on historical loss data, but non-stationarity (the assumption that past patterns predict future risk) no longer holds for climate-related perils
- Model innovation requirements—insurers must invest in forward-looking climate models incorporating atmospheric science, not just loss triangles, to remain solvent
Pandemic and Infectious Disease Outbreaks
- Correlated global exposure—modern travel and trade networks mean disease outbreaks can trigger simultaneous claims across every line of business and geography
- Business interruption coverage gaps—most property policies require direct physical loss, excluding virus-related closures; COVID-19 litigation exposed this ambiguity and prompted explicit exclusions
- Accumulation risk management—insurers learned that pandemic exposure exists in life, health, disability, event cancellation, and trade credit lines simultaneously, requiring enterprise-wide risk aggregation
Compare: Climate change vs. pandemic risk—both are systemic and challenge diversification, but climate risks are gradual and geographically concentrated while pandemic risks are sudden and globally correlated. Exam questions may ask which risk is more insurable; climate risks allow for some geographic diversification, while pandemic risk requires alternative risk transfer mechanisms.
Emerging Technology Risks
Novel technologies create liability exposures where scientific understanding, regulatory frameworks, and legal precedent all lag behind commercial deployment—the classic "long-tail" emerging risk scenario.
Nanotechnology Risks
- Unknown long-term effects—nanomaterials' health and environmental impacts may not manifest for decades, creating latent liability similar to asbestos exposure patterns
- Assessment difficulties—without established dose-response relationships or exposure standards, underwriters cannot reliably price coverage or set appropriate limits
- Regulatory evolution—emerging safety standards will shape future liability, but current uncertainty means insurers must decide whether to offer coverage before the rules are clear
Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
- Ethical and legal complexity—gene editing technologies like CRISPR raise questions about informed consent, unintended modifications, and intergenerational effects that existing liability frameworks don't address
- Testing and treatment liability—genetic testing errors or biotechnology product failures can trigger professional liability, product liability, and privacy claims simultaneously
- Specialized coverage needs—standard CGL and professional liability policies often exclude or sublimit biotech exposures, creating demand for manuscript forms
Compare: Nanotechnology vs. biotechnology risks—both involve scientific uncertainty and potential long-tail liability, but nanotech risks center on material properties and environmental release while biotech risks involve living organisms and human health decisions. FRQs may ask you to identify which requires more specialized underwriting expertise.
Business Model and Reputational Risks
New economic arrangements and communication channels create exposures that don't fit neatly into traditional coverage categories, often requiring insurers to develop entirely new products.
- Volatility and valuation challenges—cryptocurrency price swings complicate loss valuation, and insurers must decide whether to indemnify at time of theft, time of discovery, or time of claim
- Unique cybersecurity threats—exchange hacks and wallet compromises involve irreversible transactions, meaning stolen assets typically cannot be recovered unlike traditional financial fraud
- Regulatory uncertainty—evolving legal treatment of digital assets affects whether losses are covered under crime, cyber, or professional liability policies
- Viral damage potential—negative information spreads globally within hours, causing reputational harm that can destroy market value faster than any physical peril
- Legal exposure expansion—defamation, privacy violations, and intellectual property infringement on social platforms create liability for both companies and individual employees
- Crisis response coverage—reputation insurance and crisis management expense coverage represent growing product lines addressing this exposure
Emerging Liability in the Sharing Economy
- Complex liability allocation—platforms like Uber and Airbnb create triangular relationships among platform, provider, and user where traditional vicarious liability rules don't clearly apply
- Coverage gaps for participants—personal auto and homeowners policies typically exclude commercial use, leaving sharing economy participants without coverage during "on-platform" activities
- Regulatory patchwork—state and local requirements vary dramatically, forcing insurers to develop jurisdiction-specific products and compliance frameworks
Compare: Cryptocurrency risks vs. sharing economy risks—both involve new business models challenging traditional coverage, but crypto risks center on asset protection and theft while sharing economy risks involve liability allocation and coverage triggers. Both illustrate how insurance must adapt when the insured's status (owner vs. renter, investor vs. holder) is ambiguous.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Modeling uncertainty (lack of historical data) | Climate change, Nanotechnology, Pandemic |
| Liability attribution challenges | AI/Autonomous systems, Sharing economy, IoT |
| Systemic/correlated exposure | Pandemic, Climate change, Cyber (supply chain attacks) |
| Long-tail latent liability | Nanotechnology, Genetic engineering |
| Coverage gap issues | Pandemic business interruption, Sharing economy, IoT |
| Regulatory uncertainty | Cryptocurrency, AI, Biotechnology |
| Reputational/intangible losses | Social media, Cyber breaches |
| Technology as risk AND solution | AI, IoT, Blockchain |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two emerging risks share the challenge of non-stationarity—the problem that historical data doesn't reliably predict future losses? What makes traditional actuarial methods insufficient for each?
-
Compare and contrast cyber risks and IoT vulnerabilities in terms of the types of coverage that respond to each. Why might an IoT incident fall into a coverage gap between policies?
-
If an FRQ asks you to identify emerging risks with long-tail liability characteristics similar to asbestos, which risks would you select and why?
-
How do pandemic risks and climate change risks both challenge the insurance principle of diversification? Which is more insurable through traditional mechanisms, and what alternative risk transfer tools might address the other?
-
A sharing economy platform argues it's merely a technology company connecting users, not a transportation or hospitality provider. How does this business model create liability allocation challenges, and what insurance solutions have emerged to address coverage gaps?