Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The elements of art aren't just vocabulary terms to memorize—they're the building blocks you'll use to justify every creative decision in your portfolio. When AP readers evaluate your Sustained Investigation and Selected Works, they're looking for evidence that you understand how line, shape, form, color, value, texture, and space work together to communicate ideas. Your written statements need to demonstrate that you can articulate why you chose specific elements and how they serve your artistic inquiry.
Think of the elements as your visual language. The CED specifically calls out skills like "application of two-dimensional elements and principles" and "synthesis of materials, processes, and ideas"—which means you're being tested on your ability to intentionally manipulate these elements, not just identify them. Don't just memorize definitions—know what each element does compositionally, how it affects viewer response, and when to deploy it for maximum impact in your work.
These elements establish the basic architecture of your composition. They define boundaries, create shapes, and establish the physical or illusionistic structure of your work.
Compare: Shape vs. Form—both define areas, but shape is flat (2-D) while form has depth (3-D). If an FRQ asks about creating depth, discuss how you transformed shapes into forms through shading, perspective, or actual three-dimensional construction.
These elements control the lightness, darkness, and chromatic qualities of your work. They're essential for establishing mood, creating focal points, and building illusionistic depth.
Compare: Value vs. Color—value can exist without color (grayscale), but color always contains value. When documenting your process, explain whether you established values first or developed color and value simultaneously—this shows intentional decision-making.
These elements address how surfaces feel (or appear to feel) and how objects relate to each other in space. They're crucial for creating visual interest and compositional depth.
Compare: Texture vs. Space—both engage perception, but texture addresses surface quality while space addresses depth and arrangement. In your artist statement, distinguish between how you used texture to create visual interest versus how you manipulated space to establish composition.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Defining boundaries | Line, Shape |
| Creating volume/depth | Form, Value, Space |
| Establishing mood | Color, Line, Texture |
| Guiding viewer attention | Value contrast, Line direction, Space |
| 2-D specific elements | Point, Line, Shape, Plane, Layer |
| 3-D specific elements | Form, Volume, Mass, Occupied/Unoccupied Space |
| Mark-making evidence | Line quality, Texture techniques |
| Figure/ground relationship | Shape (positive/negative), Space |
Which two elements both address the concept of depth, but one does so through tonal gradation and the other through arrangement of objects?
If your Sustained Investigation explores tension and calm, which elements would you manipulate, and how would you describe their contrasting qualities in your written statement?
Compare and contrast actual texture in 3-D work versus implied texture in 2-D work—how would you document each in your process photographs?
An FRQ asks you to explain how you created emphasis in a composition. Which elements are most relevant, and what specific techniques demonstrate intentional use of those elements?
How does the relationship between positive and negative shape connect to the CED's "figure/ground relationship" principle, and why does this matter for your Selected Works documentation?