Earthquake Measurement Scales

Why This Matters

When you study earthquakes, you're really studying two fundamentally different questions: How much energy did the earthquake release? and How badly did it shake a particular location? These aren't the same thing—a massive earthquake far underground might cause less damage than a smaller one directly beneath a city. Understanding this distinction is essential because exam questions frequently test whether you can differentiate between magnitude (energy at the source) and intensity (effects at the surface).

The scales covered here demonstrate core principles you'll see throughout Earth Science: logarithmic relationships, wave behavior, energy transfer, and the interaction between geologic events and human systems. You're being tested on your ability to select the right measurement tool for a given scenario and explain why magnitude and intensity can tell very different stories about the same earthquake. Don't just memorize scale names—know what each scale actually measures and when scientists choose one over another.

---

Magnitude Scales: Measuring Energy at the Source

Magnitude scales quantify the earthquake itself—the energy released at the focus. These measurements are independent of where you're standing; an earthquake has only one magnitude, calculated from seismic data.

Richter Scale

• Logarithmic measurement of seismic wave amplitude—each whole number increase represents a tenfold increase in wave amplitude and roughly 32 times more energy released
• Developed in 1935 by Charles F. Richter specifically for Southern California earthquakes using Wood-Anderson seismographs
• Limited effectiveness for large earthquakes—the scale "saturates" above magnitude 7, making it unreliable for major seismic events and largely replaced in professional seismology

Moment Magnitude Scale (MMS)

• Measures total seismic moment—calculated from fault area, slip distance, and rock rigidity using the formula $M_0 = \mu \times A \times D$
• Preferred scale for modern seismology because it accurately measures earthquakes of all sizes, including the largest events that saturate the Richter Scale
• Consistent across distances—works equally well for local and distant earthquakes, making it the global standard for scientific reporting and hazard assessment

---

Intensity Scales: Measuring Effects at the Surface

Intensity scales describe what people experience and what damage occurs at specific locations. The same earthquake produces different intensity values at different distances from the epicenter, and local geology dramatically affects results.

Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale

• Qualitative assessment from I to XII—based on human observations, structural damage, and ground effects rather than instrumental measurements
• Roman numerals indicate shaking severity—I means imperceptible, VI causes dishes to break, XII indicates total destruction with visible ground waves
• Location-dependent values—a single earthquake generates a map of different intensities, highest near the epicenter and decreasing with distance (useful for understanding seismic hazard zones)

Shindo Scale (Japan)

• Japanese intensity scale ranging from 0 to 7—specifically designed for Japan's high seismic activity and integrated into the national early warning system
• Accounts for local site conditions—soft sediments amplify shaking, so the scale reflects what people actually experience rather than just source energy
• Real-time public communication tool—broadcasts intensity levels immediately after earthquakes to guide evacuation and emergency response decisions

European Macroseismic Scale (EMS)

• Standardized European intensity scale from I to XII—developed in 1998 to create consistent damage reporting across countries with different building traditions
• Incorporates vulnerability classifications—accounts for how different construction types (masonry, reinforced concrete, wood) respond to shaking
• Enables cross-border disaster coordination—essential for European Union emergency response when earthquakes affect multiple nations

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. An earthquake occurs in Chile and is reported as magnitude 8.2. Which scale was most likely used, and why would the Richter Scale be inappropriate for this measurement?

2. Compare and contrast what the Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale and the Moment Magnitude Scale tell us about the same earthquake. Why might a magnitude 6.0 earthquake produce Mercalli intensities ranging from III to VIII?

3. Which two scales share the characteristic of being based on human observations and structural damage rather than seismograph readings?

4. A city built on soft sedimentary deposits experiences stronger shaking than a nearby city on bedrock during the same earthquake. Which type of scale (magnitude or intensity) would capture this difference, and why?

5. If an FRQ asks you to explain why two communities at equal distances from an epicenter experienced different levels of damage, which measurement concept should frame your answer—and what factors would you discuss?