Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Disruptive innovation isn't just a buzzwordโit's a testable framework for understanding how new entrants topple established industries. You're being tested on your ability to identify why certain business models succeed in displacing incumbents, not just what companies did. The key principles at play include asset-light platforms, freemium monetization, direct-to-consumer channels, and subscription-based recurring revenueโconcepts that appear repeatedly in case analyses and strategic frameworks.
These ten companies didn't just get lucky; they each exploited a specific vulnerability in traditional business models. Some leveraged underutilized assets, others removed friction from purchasing, and still others democratized access to previously exclusive markets. As you study these examples, don't just memorize company namesโknow what disruption mechanism each one illustrates and be ready to apply that logic to unfamiliar scenarios.
These disruptors built massive scale without owning the core assets they monetize. By connecting supply and demand through technology platforms, they transferred capital risk to participants while capturing transaction value.
Compare: Airbnb vs. Uberโboth are asset-light platforms monetizing underutilized assets (homes, cars), but Airbnb disrupted a hospitality value chain while Uber disrupted transportation logistics. If asked to analyze platform business models, these two demonstrate how the same mechanism applies across different industries.
These companies replaced one-time transactions with recurring relationships. By lowering upfront costs and building habitual usage, they created predictable revenue streams and higher customer lifetime value.
Compare: Netflix vs. Spotifyโboth use subscription models for content access, but Netflix owns much of its content while Spotify licenses from labels. This distinction matters for margin structure and negotiating power. FRQ tip: use this pair to discuss vertical integration trade-offs in platform businesses.
These disruptors bypassed traditional intermediaries to own the customer relationship. By eliminating middlemen, they captured margin, controlled brand experience, and gathered first-party data.
Compare: Tesla vs. Warby Parkerโboth eliminated traditional retail intermediaries (dealerships, optical shops), but Tesla faced regulatory barriers (dealer franchise laws) while Warby Parker faced behavioral barriers (trying on glasses). Use these examples to discuss how DTC strategies must address industry-specific friction points.
These disruptors made previously exclusive products or services available to mass markets. By lowering price points and simplifying interfaces, they expanded total addressable markets rather than just stealing share.
Compare: Amazon vs. Robinhoodโboth democratized access (shopping, investing), but Amazon built physical infrastructure while Robinhood remained purely digital. This distinction affects capital requirements, scalability, and competitive defensibility. Consider which model is more sustainable when analyzing disruption longevity.
| Disruption Mechanism | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Asset-light platform | Airbnb, Uber, Zipcar |
| Subscription/recurring revenue | Netflix, Dollar Shave Club, Spotify |
| Freemium monetization | Spotify, Robinhood |
| Direct-to-consumer channel | Tesla, Warby Parker, Dollar Shave Club |
| Market democratization | Amazon, Robinhood, Zipcar |
| Data-driven personalization | Netflix, Spotify, Amazon |
| Platform diversification | Uber (Eats), Amazon (AWS) |
| Trust/review infrastructure | Airbnb, Uber |
Which two companies best illustrate asset-light platform models, and what specific assets do they monetize without owning?
Compare Netflix and Spotify's subscription models: what key difference in content ownership affects their margin structures and negotiating power?
Both Tesla and Warby Parker use direct-to-consumer salesโwhat different types of barriers (regulatory vs. behavioral) did each have to overcome?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how freemium models create value, which company would you use as your primary example and why?
Amazon and Robinhood both "democratized access" to their respective markets. Contrast their approaches: which built physical infrastructure, and how does this affect their long-term defensibility?