Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
In AP Art and Design, you're not just being tested on what you create—you're evaluated on how well you can articulate the relationship between materials, processes, and ideas. Digital tools are materials, and understanding their distinct capabilities helps you make intentional choices that strengthen your Sustained Investigation. The CED emphasizes that materials influence how viewers interpret your work, so knowing why you chose Procreate over Photoshop (or used both) demonstrates the kind of inquiry-driven decision-making that earns high scores.
Whether you're submitting to the 2-D Art and Design portfolio or incorporating digital elements into Drawing or 3-D work, these tools connect to core concepts: layering, iteration, scalability, and synthesis. The Sustained Investigation rubric specifically rewards evidence of practice, experimentation, and revision—and digital tools excel at documenting that process through version history, layers, and time-lapse features. Don't just memorize software names—know what each tool enables you to do and how it supports your artistic inquiry.
Raster software works with pixels—tiny squares of color that form images. These tools excel at photorealistic work, texture, and complex color blending, but images lose quality when scaled up. Choose raster tools when your investigation involves photography, digital painting, or detailed compositing.
Compare: Photoshop vs. GIMP—both offer layer-based raster editing, but Photoshop provides deeper integration with professional workflows while GIMP offers zero-cost accessibility. In your artist statement, explaining why you chose one over the other demonstrates intentional material selection.
Vector software uses mathematical paths and anchor points rather than pixels. Images remain crisp at any size, making vectors essential for logos, typography, and graphics requiring scalability. These tools emphasize precision and clean geometric forms.
Compare: Illustrator vs. Clip Studio Paint—Illustrator prioritizes precision and scalability for graphic design, while Clip Studio blends vector precision with painterly expression for illustration. If an FRQ asks about choosing tools for different artistic purposes, this contrast demonstrates material-process understanding.
Digital art hardware translates physical gesture into digital marks. Pressure sensitivity, tilt recognition, and surface texture affect how naturally tools respond to your hand. Your hardware choice directly impacts the quality of mark-making evidence in your portfolio.
Compare: Wacom tablets vs. iPad with Procreate—Wacom offers universal compatibility with desktop software and larger working surfaces, while iPad provides portability and an integrated drawing-on-screen experience. Your choice reflects how you prioritize mobility versus workspace integration in your practice.
Some software specializes in replicating traditional art materials digitally. These tools emphasize texture, brush behavior, and media-specific effects that reference physical painting and drawing. They're ideal for investigations exploring the boundary between traditional and digital processes.
Compare: Corel Painter vs. Procreate—both excel at digital painting, but Painter focuses on replicating traditional media behavior while Procreate balances natural feel with digital-native features. This distinction matters when your artist statement addresses why your work looks and feels a certain way.
3D software creates virtual objects and environments with form, volume, and mass. These tools connect directly to 3-D Art and Design skills, even when output is rendered as 2-D images. Consider 3D tools for investigations involving space, sculpture visualization, or animation.
Publication software focuses on arranging text and images across pages and spreads. These tools emphasize hierarchy, typography, and the relationship between visual elements. Essential for artists creating books, zines, or multi-page portfolio presentations.
Compare: InDesign vs. Illustrator—both handle text and graphics, but InDesign excels at multi-page documents and text flow while Illustrator focuses on single-page graphic design. Choose based on whether your investigation involves sequential pages or standalone compositions.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Raster/Pixel-Based Editing | Photoshop, Procreate, Krita, GIMP |
| Vector/Path-Based Design | Illustrator, Clip Studio Paint |
| Process Documentation | Procreate (time-lapse), Photoshop (version history) |
| Traditional Media Simulation | Corel Painter, Procreate, Krita |
| 3D Form and Space | Blender |
| Layout and Publication | InDesign |
| Free/Open-Source Options | Krita, GIMP, Blender |
| Mobile/Portable Creation | Procreate (iPad) |
Which two tools would best support an investigation comparing raster painting techniques to vector illustration, and how would you document your experimentation between them?
If your Sustained Investigation explores the relationship between traditional and digital mark-making, which software would you choose and why? What written evidence would you provide?
Compare Photoshop and Procreate as tools for documenting practice and revision—what built-in features does each offer, and how might your choice affect your portfolio submission?
A classmate wants to create a multi-page artist book combining photographs, illustrations, and written reflection. Which tools would you recommend for different stages of this project?
How would you explain in your artist statement why you chose free software like Krita or Blender over industry-standard paid alternatives? What does this choice reveal about your materials-processes-ideas synthesis?