Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Dialogue is where your characters come alive on the pageโit's the moment readers hear your story rather than just see it. In creative writing, you're being tested on your ability to create authentic voice, narrative economy, and dramatic tension through conversation. Strong dialogue does triple duty: it reveals who your characters are, moves your plot forward, and creates emotional resonance without relying on clunky exposition.
Don't just memorize formatting rules or generic advice about "making dialogue sound natural." Instead, understand what each technique accomplishes and when to deploy it. The best dialogue writers know that every line of conversation is a choiceโwhat characters say, how they say it, and what they leave unsaid all communicate meaning. Master these principles, and your scenes will crackle with energy.
The most memorable dialogue comes from characters who sound like themselvesโnot like the author or like each other. Voice is the fingerprint of personality on the page.
Compare: A professor character vs. a teenagerโboth might express frustration, but the professor might say "This is utterly unacceptable" while the teen says "Are you serious right now?" Same emotion, completely different voices. In workshop, being able to articulate why these differences matter shows craft awareness.
Every line of dialogue should earn its place. If a conversation doesn't reveal character, advance plot, or build tension, it's taking up space that could do real work.
Compare: "I can't believe you forgot our anniversary again" vs. "We've been married for ten years and you always forget our anniversary." The first implies history and emotion; the second lectures the reader. If a workshop critique mentions "on-the-nose dialogue," this is usually the problem.
The most powerful dialogue often happens between the lines. Subtext is the iceberg beneath the surfaceโwhat characters mean versus what they actually say.
Compare: Direct conflict ("I hate you!") vs. subtext-driven conflict ("I hope you have a really nice time at your mother's"). The second is more sophisticated because it forces readers to interpretโand interpretation creates investment. Workshop readers will notice when you trust them to read between the lines.
The mechanics of dialogue may seem mundane, but they're the infrastructure that lets your conversations flow. Proper formatting is invisible when done right and distracting when done wrong.
Compare: "'I don't know,' she said, shrugging" vs. "She shrugged. 'I don't know.'" The second version is cleanerโthe action beat replaces the tag and adds visual information. In revision, look for opportunities to make this swap throughout your draft.
| Concept | Key Techniques |
|---|---|
| Character Voice | Distinct vocabulary, consistent speech patterns, background-appropriate language |
| Narrative Economy | Purposeful lines, no filler, multitasking dialogue |
| Avoiding Exposition | Implication over explanation, present-moment focus, "as you know" elimination |
| Subtext | Silence, deflection, answering different questions, unspoken emotion |
| Conflict and Tension | Disagreement, misunderstanding, escalation, competing goals |
| Action Beats | Physical behavior replacing tags, showing emotion through action |
| Formatting | New paragraphs per speaker, punctuation inside quotes, standard conventions |
| Revision Practice | Reading aloud, checking rhythm, identifying awkward phrasing |
What two techniques help you avoid "on-the-nose" dialogue where characters state exactly what they mean?
Compare action beats and dialogue tagsโwhen would you choose one over the other, and why does the choice matter for pacing?
If a workshop reader says your characters "all sound the same," which specific techniques would you use in revision to differentiate their voices?
How does subtext create reader engagement differently than direct statement? Identify a scenario where leaving something unsaid would be more powerful than saying it.
You're revising a scene where two characters discuss their shared history. What's the danger of this setup, and how would you rewrite the dialogue to avoid exposition while still conveying backstory?