Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Database performance metrics are the diagnostic tools that separate struggling systems from ones that scale gracefully under pressure. When you're tested on database concepts, you're expected to understand not just what these metrics measure, but why they matter for system design decisions—things like query optimization, resource allocation, concurrency control, and system bottleneck identification. These metrics connect directly to core database principles including transaction processing, memory management, and the fundamental tradeoff between speed and resource consumption.
Think of performance metrics as the vital signs of your database system. Just as a doctor uses heart rate and blood pressure to diagnose health issues, database administrators use these metrics to identify problems before they cascade into system failures. Don't just memorize what each metric measures—know what concept each metric illustrates and how different metrics interact with each other. If throughput drops while CPU utilization spikes, you should be able to reason through what's happening and why.
These metrics measure how quickly your database responds to requests. The fundamental principle here is latency—the delay between a request and its fulfillment. Time-based metrics directly impact user experience and system responsiveness.
Compare: Query Response Time vs. Query Execution Plan Analysis—both focus on query performance, but response time tells you that something is slow while execution plan analysis tells you why it's slow. If an FRQ asks you to optimize a slow query, start with the execution plan.
These metrics reveal how much work your database can handle simultaneously. The core concept is system capacity—the maximum sustainable workload before performance degrades.
Compare: Throughput vs. Connection Pool Utilization—throughput measures actual work completed, while connection pool utilization measures the efficiency of your connection infrastructure. You can have high throughput with poor pool utilization (wasteful) or good pool utilization with low throughput (bottleneck elsewhere).
These metrics track how database operations consume hardware resources. The principle here is resource contention—when multiple processes compete for limited CPU, memory, or disk access.
Compare: CPU Utilization vs. Memory Usage vs. Disk I/O—these three form the classic resource triangle. A query might be CPU-bound (complex calculations), memory-bound (large sorts exceeding buffer space), or I/O-bound (reading lots of data from disk). Identifying which resource is the bottleneck determines your optimization strategy.
These metrics measure how well your database avoids unnecessary work. The underlying principle is optimization—achieving results with minimal resource expenditure.
Compare: Cache Hit Ratio vs. Index Efficiency—both reduce disk I/O but through different mechanisms. Caching keeps frequently accessed data in memory, while indexing provides faster paths to locate specific data on disk. A well-indexed query that misses cache still performs reasonably; a poorly indexed query with high cache hit ratio may still scan too much data.
These metrics track how well your database handles multiple simultaneous operations. The core concept is transaction isolation—ensuring concurrent transactions don't interfere with each other while maximizing parallelism.
Compare: Deadlock Rate vs. Throughput—deadlocks directly reduce throughput since rolled-back transactions must be retried. However, aggressive deadlock prevention (like coarse-grained locking) can also reduce throughput by limiting concurrency. The goal is balancing parallelism with conflict avoidance.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| User Experience Impact | Query Response Time, Throughput |
| Resource Bottleneck Detection | CPU Utilization, Memory Usage, Disk I/O Performance |
| Query Optimization | Query Execution Plan Analysis, Index Efficiency |
| Memory Efficiency | Cache Hit Ratio, Memory Usage |
| Concurrency Health | Deadlock Rate, Connection Pool Utilization |
| Capacity Planning | Throughput, CPU Utilization, Disk I/O Performance |
| System Scaling Decisions | All resource metrics combined |
A database has high CPU utilization but low disk I/O. What type of operations are likely causing the bottleneck, and what optimization strategies would you consider?
Compare and contrast Cache Hit Ratio and Index Efficiency—how do both metrics reduce disk I/O, and in what scenarios would improving one matter more than the other?
If throughput suddenly drops while deadlock rate increases, what is likely happening in the system? What would you examine first?
A query has poor response time. Which two metrics would you analyze first to determine whether the problem is resource-related or query-design-related?
Explain why high memory usage combined with a low cache hit ratio is particularly problematic. What does this combination suggest about the database configuration?