Data Preprocessing Steps

Why This Matters

Data preprocessing isn't just busywork before the "real" analysis begins—it's where forecasting models succeed or fail. You're being tested on your understanding that garbage in equals garbage out: even the most sophisticated algorithms can't compensate for poorly prepared data. The preprocessing decisions you make directly impact model accuracy, interpretability, and generalizability. Expect exam questions that ask you to identify appropriate techniques for specific data problems or explain why a particular preprocessing step improves forecast performance.

The concepts here connect to broader themes in business forecasting: stationarity requirements, model assumptions, bias-variance tradeoffs, and validation strategies. Don't just memorize that you should "handle missing values"—know when imputation beats deletion, why normalization matters for certain algorithms, and how improper data splitting leads to overfitting. Each preprocessing step exists to solve a specific problem, and understanding that problem is what separates strong exam answers from weak ones.

---

Ensuring Data Quality and Integrity

Before any modeling can begin, your data must be complete, accurate, and unified. These foundational steps address the raw material problems that would otherwise propagate errors throughout your entire forecasting pipeline.

Data Collection and Integration

• Source diversity—gather data from databases, APIs, web scraping, and internal systems to ensure comprehensive coverage of relevant variables
• Relevance assessment requires confirming that collected data actually relates to your forecasting objective; more data isn't always better data
• Integration challenges include resolving inconsistent formats, duplicate records, and conflicting values when merging multiple sources into a unified dataset

Data Cleaning

• Missing value treatment involves choosing between imputation (mean, median, or model-based), deletion, or flagging—each with different implications for bias and sample size
• Outlier detection uses statistical methods like IQR or z-scores to identify anomalies; the decision to remove, cap, or retain outliers depends on whether they represent errors or genuine extreme values
• Data quality directly impacts forecast accuracy—cleaning isn't optional, it's foundational to every downstream step

---

Scaling and Transforming Features

Different algorithms have different assumptions about data scale and distribution. Transformation techniques ensure your features meet these assumptions and contribute equally to model training.

Normalization

• Min-max scaling transforms features to a common range (typically 0 to 1), calculated as $X_{norm} = \frac{X - X_{min}}{X_{max} - X_{min}}$
• Distance-based algorithms like k-nearest neighbors and neural networks require normalization because they're sensitive to feature magnitude differences
• Preserves original distribution shape while changing scale—useful when you need bounded values or when outliers aren't extreme

Standardization

• Z-score transformation centers data with mean zero and standard deviation one: $X_{std} = \frac{X - \mu}{\sigma}$
• Model convergence improves for gradient-based optimization algorithms when features are standardized; this is why standardization is default for many ML implementations
• Handles outliers better than normalization because it's not bounded by min/max values, though extreme outliers still affect the mean and standard deviation

---

Feature Engineering and Selection

Raw variables rarely capture all the predictive signal in your data. Feature engineering creates new information, while feature selection eliminates noise—both improve model performance and interpretability.

Feature Selection

• Recursive feature elimination (RFE) iteratively removes the least important features based on model coefficients or importance scores
• Tree-based importance measures how much each feature reduces impurity across decision splits—a model-agnostic way to rank predictive power
• Reducing dimensionality prevents overfitting and improves interpretability; fewer features means simpler models that generalize better

Feature Engineering

• Polynomial features capture nonlinear relationships by creating squared terms or interactions: $X_1 \times X_2$ or $X_1^2$
• Domain knowledge drives creation of meaningful features—for sales forecasting, this might mean creating "days since last promotion" or "holiday proximity" variables
• Interaction terms reveal relationships that individual features miss; the effect of price on sales might depend on competitor pricing

Dimensionality Reduction

• Principal Component Analysis (PCA) creates uncorrelated linear combinations of features that capture maximum variance, reducing feature count while retaining information
• Prevents the curse of dimensionality—as features increase, data becomes sparse and distance metrics become meaningless
• Trade-off with interpretability since principal components are mathematical constructs, not original business variables; harder to explain to stakeholders

---

Handling Categorical and Imbalanced Data

Not all data comes in convenient numerical form, and not all outcomes occur with equal frequency. These techniques address structural data challenges that would otherwise bias your forecasts.

Encoding Categorical Variables

• One-hot encoding creates binary columns for each category—essential for nominal variables where no ordering exists (region, product type)
• Label encoding assigns integers to categories and works for ordinal variables, but can mislead algorithms into assuming mathematical relationships between categories
• High cardinality problems arise when categories have many unique values; target encoding or embedding techniques prevent feature explosion

Handling Imbalanced Datasets

• Class imbalance distorts model training because algorithms optimize for majority class accuracy while ignoring minority class patterns
• SMOTE (Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique) generates synthetic examples by interpolating between existing minority class observations
• Evaluation metrics must change—accuracy is misleading; use F1-score, precision-recall curves, or AUC-ROC to assess performance on imbalanced data

---

Time Series-Specific Preprocessing

Forecasting temporal data requires specialized techniques that respect the sequential nature of observations. Time series preprocessing addresses patterns that cross-sectional methods ignore entirely.

Time Series Decomposition

• Additive decomposition separates data into $Y_t = T_t + S_t + R_t$ (trend + seasonality + residual) when seasonal fluctuations are constant over time
• Multiplicative decomposition uses $Y_t = T_t \times S_t \times R_t$ when seasonal effects scale with the trend level
• Component analysis reveals structure—understanding each element separately guides model selection and feature engineering

Handling Seasonality and Trends

• Differencing removes trends by computing $Y'_t = Y_t - Y_{t-1}$, helping achieve stationarity required by ARIMA-family models
• Seasonal indicators (dummy variables for month, quarter, day-of-week) allow models to learn recurring patterns explicitly
• Detrending and deseasonalizing isolate the random component, making patterns clearer and forecasts more accurate

---

Validation Strategy

How you split data determines whether your performance estimates reflect real-world forecasting ability. Proper validation prevents the optimistic bias that comes from testing on data your model has already seen.

Data Splitting

• Training set (60-80%) is used to fit model parameters; the model learns patterns exclusively from this subset
• Validation set (10-20%) enables hyperparameter tuning without contaminating the test set; this is where you compare model configurations
• Test set (10-20%) provides final unbiased performance estimate—never use test data for any decision-making during model development

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. You're building a demand forecasting model and notice that 25% of your historical sales records have missing promotion data. Compare imputation versus deletion—which approach would you recommend and why?

2. A colleague standardized all features before applying a random forest model. Was this necessary? Explain which algorithms require scaling and which are scale-invariant.

3. Your classification model for customer churn shows 95% accuracy but only 12% recall on actual churners. What preprocessing step was likely skipped, and what techniques would address this?

4. When preprocessing time series data for an ARIMA model, why is differencing applied? What assumption does this help satisfy?

5. You have a categorical variable "product_category" with 500 unique values. Compare one-hot encoding versus target encoding for this situation—what are the tradeoffs of each approach?