Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Data preprocessing isn't just busywork before the "real" analysis begins—it's where numerical analysis meets practical data science. You're being tested on your understanding of how raw data transforms into algorithm-ready inputs, and why certain preprocessing choices can make or break model performance. The mathematical foundations here connect directly to concepts like numerical stability, convergence rates, distance metrics, and variance-bias tradeoffs that appear throughout your coursework.
Every preprocessing technique addresses a specific numerical or statistical problem: scaling prevents features from dominating distance calculations, transformations stabilize variance for parametric methods, and dimensionality reduction tackles the curse of dimensionality. Don't just memorize that you should "normalize your data"—know when min-max scaling beats standardization, why log transforms help skewed distributions, and how missing value strategies affect your downstream statistics.
Many algorithms depend on distance calculations or gradient-based optimization, making feature scales critically important. When features exist on vastly different scales, algorithms can become numerically unstable or converge slowly.
Compare: Min-Max Scaling vs. Z-score Standardization—both rescale features, but min-max bounds output to while z-score allows unbounded values. Use min-max for algorithms requiring bounded inputs; use z-score when outliers are present or when you need interpretable standard deviations.
Real-world datasets arrive messy. Addressing quality issues before analysis prevents garbage-in-garbage-out scenarios and ensures your numerical methods operate on valid inputs.
Compare: Mean Imputation vs. Multiple Imputation—mean imputation is fast but underestimates variance and distorts correlations. Multiple imputation preserves uncertainty by creating several plausible datasets. If an FRQ asks about imputation effects on standard errors, multiple imputation is your go-to example.
Many statistical methods assume normally distributed data with constant variance. Transformations reshape distributions to better satisfy these assumptions and improve numerical behavior.
Compare: Log Transformation vs. Box-Cox—log is a special case of Box-Cox where . Box-Cox is more flexible but requires positive data and parameter estimation. When you know data is right-skewed with multiplicative effects, log is simpler; when seeking optimal normality, Box-Cox provides data-driven selection.
High-dimensional data creates computational challenges and statistical problems like overfitting. Reducing dimensions while preserving information is both an art and a mathematically rigorous process.
Compare: PCA vs. Feature Selection—PCA creates new composite features (principal components) that are linear combinations of originals, while feature selection keeps original features intact. PCA maximizes variance explained; feature selection maximizes predictive relevance. For interpretability, feature selection wins; for maximum variance retention, use PCA.
Machine learning algorithms require numerical inputs, but real data includes categorical variables. Encoding schemes convert categories to numbers while preserving (or intentionally ignoring) ordinal relationships.
Compare: One-Hot vs. Label Encoding—one-hot prevents algorithms from inferring false ordering (red < blue < green) but explodes feature space for high-cardinality variables. Label encoding is compact but implies ordinality. For nominal categories with few levels, use one-hot; for ordinal data or trees, label encoding works well.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Distance-sensitive scaling | Min-Max normalization, Z-score standardization |
| Gradient descent optimization | Feature scaling, standardization |
| Missing data handling | Mean/median imputation, multiple imputation, k-NN imputation |
| Distributional assumptions | Log transformation, Box-Cox, square root |
| Outlier identification | Z-score method, IQR method, box plots |
| Variance reduction | PCA, feature selection, LASSO |
| Categorical conversion | One-hot encoding, label encoding, target encoding |
| Continuous-to-discrete | Equal-width binning, equal-frequency binning |
Which two preprocessing methods both involve rescaling features but differ in how they handle outliers? Explain when you'd choose each.
A dataset has 15% missing values in a key predictor. Compare mean imputation versus multiple imputation—how would each affect your standard error estimates?
You're preparing data for k-means clustering with features ranging from to . Which preprocessing step is essential, and what numerical problem does it solve?
FRQ-style: A variable showing right-skewed count data violates the normality assumption for linear regression. Identify two transformation approaches and explain the tradeoff between them.
When would you choose PCA over feature selection for dimensionality reduction? Consider both interpretability and the mathematical properties of each method.