Why This Matters
Customer experience metrics aren't just numbers on a dashboard—they're the diagnostic tools that reveal whether your CX strategy is actually working. You're being tested on your ability to connect specific metrics to their strategic purpose: loyalty measurement, effort reduction, financial valuation, and operational efficiency. Understanding which metric answers which business question is the difference between data collection and actionable insight.
The real exam challenge isn't memorizing formulas—it's knowing when to deploy each metric and how they interact. A company might have high CSAT but terrible retention, or low churn but declining CLV. Don't just memorize what each metric measures—know what business problem it solves, how it's calculated, and what actions it should trigger when the numbers shift.
Loyalty and Sentiment Indicators
These metrics capture how customers feel about your brand and whether they'll stick around. They measure the emotional and relational health of your customer base, answering the fundamental question: do customers actually like us?
- Measures likelihood to recommend—customers rate on a 0-10 scale, then get classified as Promoters (9-10), Passives (7-8), or Detractors (0-6)
- Calculated as % Promoters minus % Detractors—scores range from -100 to +100, with anything above 0 considered acceptable
- Best for benchmarking competitive position—widely adopted across industries, making cross-company comparisons meaningful
Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)
- Captures satisfaction with specific interactions—typically a 1-5 or 1-7 scale survey immediately following a touchpoint
- Highly contextual and actionable—because it's tied to specific moments, you can pinpoint exactly where experiences succeed or fail
- Expressed as percentage of satisfied responses—usually counts only top-box scores (4-5 on a 5-point scale) as "satisfied"
Compare: NPS vs. CSAT—both measure sentiment, but NPS captures overall brand loyalty while CSAT evaluates specific interactions. Use NPS for strategic positioning, CSAT for operational improvements. If asked about improving a particular touchpoint, CSAT is your answer.
Effort and Friction Metrics
These metrics focus on how hard customers have to work to accomplish their goals. The underlying principle: reducing customer effort is often more powerful than delighting customers. Friction kills loyalty faster than mediocrity.
Customer Effort Score (CES)
- Measures ease of interaction—typically asks "How easy was it to resolve your issue?" on a scale from Very Difficult to Very Easy
- Strong predictor of future loyalty—research shows low-effort experiences drive repurchase behavior more reliably than high satisfaction alone
- Identifies friction points in the journey—particularly valuable for support interactions, onboarding flows, and self-service channels
- Percentage of issues resolved in one interaction—no callbacks, no transfers, no follow-up emails required
- Directly reduces customer effort—every additional contact multiplies frustration and erodes loyalty
- Benchmark for support team effectiveness—high FCR indicates well-trained agents, good knowledge bases, and appropriate agent authority
Average Resolution Time
- Tracks mean time from issue creation to closure—measured in minutes, hours, or days depending on context
- Shorter times correlate with higher satisfaction—but only when quality isn't sacrificed for speed
- Reveals process inefficiencies—spikes often indicate training gaps, system limitations, or resource constraints
Compare: CES vs. FCR—CES captures the customer's perception of effort, while FCR measures actual resolution efficiency. A company might have high FCR but low CES if the single interaction was frustrating. Use both together for complete picture.
Financial Value Metrics
These metrics translate customer relationships into revenue terms. They answer the critical business question: what is this customer worth, and what should we spend to keep them?
Customer Lifetime Value (CLV)
- Predicts total revenue from a customer relationship—calculated using CLV=Average Purchase Value×Purchase Frequency×Customer Lifespan
- Guides acquisition spending decisions—if CLV is 500, spending 400 to acquire that customer might still be profitable
- Varies significantly by segment—high-value customers may warrant premium service investments that would be unprofitable for low-CLV segments
Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC)
- Total cost to acquire one new customer—includes marketing spend, sales salaries, onboarding costs divided by new customers acquired
- Must be evaluated against CLV—the CLV:CAC ratio indicates business health; 3:1 or higher is generally considered sustainable
- Informs channel investment decisions—comparing CAC across marketing channels reveals where acquisition dollars work hardest
Compare: CLV vs. CAC—CLV measures what you gain from customers, CAC measures what you spend to get them. A business with high CLV can afford higher CAC; low CLV demands ruthless acquisition efficiency. The ratio between them determines profitability.
Retention and Attrition Metrics
These metrics track whether customers stay or leave—the ultimate behavioral validation of your CX efforts. Sentiment means nothing if customers still walk away.
Customer Retention Rate
- Percentage of customers kept over a period—calculated as Customers at StartCustomers at End−New Customers×100
- Retention is cheaper than acquisition—studies consistently show retaining existing customers costs 5-25x less than acquiring new ones
- Directly impacts profitability—even small retention improvements compound significantly over time through repeat purchases and referrals
Churn Rate
- Percentage of customers lost over a period—calculated as Total Customers at StartLost Customers×100
- The inverse of retention—mathematically, Retention Rate=100%−Churn Rate
- Early warning system for CX problems—rising churn often signals issues before they appear in satisfaction scores
Compare: Retention Rate vs. Churn Rate—these are mathematical inverses, but framing matters. Retention emphasizes success and goal-setting; churn emphasizes problems and urgency. Use retention when celebrating wins, churn when diagnosing issues.
Composite and Predictive Metrics
These metrics combine multiple signals to create holistic assessments of customer relationship health. They're leading indicators that help you act before problems become visible in revenue.
Customer Health Score
- Aggregates multiple signals into one score—typically combines engagement metrics, product usage, support interactions, and satisfaction data
- Customized to business context—a SaaS company might weight login frequency heavily; a retailer might emphasize purchase recency
- Enables proactive intervention—declining health scores trigger outreach before the customer considers leaving, making it essential for customer success management
Quick Reference Table
|
| Loyalty/Sentiment | NPS, CSAT |
| Effort/Friction | CES, FCR, Average Resolution Time |
| Financial Value | CLV, CAC |
| Retention/Attrition | Retention Rate, Churn Rate |
| Predictive Health | Customer Health Score |
| Benchmarking | NPS, CSAT |
| Operational Efficiency | FCR, Average Resolution Time |
| Investment Decisions | CLV:CAC Ratio |
Self-Check Questions
-
A customer reports their issue was resolved quickly, but they describe the process as "exhausting." Which two metrics might show conflicting results, and why?
-
Your company has strong NPS scores but rising churn. What might explain this disconnect, and which additional metric would help diagnose the problem?
-
Compare and contrast CLV and CAC: How do these metrics work together to inform customer acquisition strategy, and what ratio would indicate an unsustainable business model?
-
If an FRQ asks you to recommend metrics for a company launching a new self-service portal, which three metrics would be most relevant and what would each reveal?
-
A business wants to predict which customers are likely to leave before they actually churn. Which metric is designed for this purpose, and what inputs might it incorporate?