Electromagnetism isn't just a collection of formulas—it's the unified framework that explains everything from how your phone charges to why light exists. You're being tested on your ability to see the connections: how electric fields create magnetic fields, how changing flux induces EMF, and how energy propagates through space. The formulas in this guide aren't isolated facts; they're pieces of a coherent theory that Maxwell unified in the 19th century and that still powers modern physics and engineering.
When you encounter these equations on an exam, you need to know more than the symbols. You need to understand which physical principle each formula expresses, when to apply each one, and how they relate to each other. Don't just memorize ∇×E=−∂t∂B—know that it's Faraday's Law telling you that changing magnetic fields create electric fields. That conceptual link is what separates a correct answer from a complete one.
The Four Pillars: Maxwell's Equations
These four equations form the complete theoretical foundation of classical electromagnetism. Every other formula in this guide either derives from or connects to Maxwell's Equations.
Maxwell's Equations (Unified Framework)
Four equations that fully describe classical electromagnetism—Gauss's Law, Gauss's Law for Magnetism, Faraday's Law, and Ampère-Maxwell Law working together
Predict electromagnetic waves traveling at speed c=μ0ε01, unifying electricity, magnetism, and optics
Differential and integral forms serve different purposes: integral forms for symmetric problems, differential forms for local field behavior
Gauss's Law
Relates electric flux to enclosed charge—integral form: ∮E⋅dA=ε0Qenc
Differential form∇⋅E=ε0ρ reveals that electric charges are sources of electric field lines
Best applied to symmetric geometries—spherical, cylindrical, or planar charge distributions where you can exploit symmetry
Faraday's Law of Induction
Changing magnetic flux induces EMF—the principle behind generators, transformers, and inductors
Integral form:∮E⋅dl=−dtdΦB; differential form:∇×E=−∂t∂B
The negative sign (Lenz's Law) ensures induced currents oppose the change that created them—energy conservation in action
Ampère-Maxwell Law
Magnetic fields arise from currents AND changing electric fields—Maxwell's crucial addition of the displacement current term
Integral form:∮B⋅dl=μ0Ienc+μ0ε0dtdΦE; differential form:∇×B=μ0J+μ0ε0∂t∂E
The displacement current termμ0ε0∂t∂E is what allows electromagnetic waves to propagate through vacuum
Compare: Faraday's Law vs. Ampère-Maxwell Law—both involve curl equations relating E and B, but Faraday describes how changing B creates E, while Ampère-Maxwell describes how currents and changing E create B. Together, they enable self-sustaining electromagnetic waves.
Source Equations: Where Fields Come From
These formulas calculate the fields produced by specific charge and current configurations. Use these when you know the source and need to find the field.
Coulomb's Law
Electrostatic force between point charges:F=4πε01r2q1q2r^
Inverse-square dependence on distance—doubling the separation reduces force by a factor of four
Foundation for electric field concept:E=qF gives the field of a point charge as E=4πε01r2qr^
Biot-Savart Law
Magnetic field from a current element:dB=4πμ0r2Idl×r^
Use for complex geometries where Ampère's Law symmetry doesn't apply—finite wires, current loops, arbitrary shapes
Cross product structure means the field is perpendicular to both the current direction and the displacement vector
Compare: Coulomb's Law vs. Biot-Savart Law—both are inverse-square source equations, but Coulomb gives E from charges while Biot-Savart gives B from currents. If an FRQ asks you to find fields from known sources without obvious symmetry, these are your tools.
Force and Motion: How Fields Affect Charges
These formulas describe what happens when charged particles encounter electromagnetic fields. The bridge between field theory and observable dynamics.
Lorentz Force Law
Total electromagnetic force on a charge:F=q(E+v×B)
Electric forceqE acts parallel to the field; magnetic forceqv×B acts perpendicular to both velocity and field
Magnetic force does no work since it's always perpendicular to velocity—it changes direction, not speed
Larmor Formula
Power radiated by accelerating charge:P=324πε0c3q2a2=6πε0c3q2a2
Proportional to acceleration squared—explains why synchrotron radiation is significant for relativistic particles
Non-relativistic limit only; relativistic corrections involve γ4 factors that dramatically increase radiated power
Compare: Lorentz Force vs. Larmor Formula—Lorentz tells you how fields affect a charge's motion, while Larmor tells you how that accelerated motion produces radiation. Together, they explain phenomena like cyclotron motion and synchrotron light sources.
Energy and Propagation: Electromagnetic Waves
These formulas describe how electromagnetic energy moves through space. The key to understanding light, radio waves, and radiation.
Wave Equation for Electromagnetic Waves
Derived from Maxwell's Equations:∇2E=μ0ε0∂t2∂2E (and similarly for B)
Wave speedc=μ0ε01≈3×108m/s—Maxwell's prediction that light is electromagnetic
E and B oscillate perpendicular to each other and to the propagation direction—transverse waves
Poynting Vector
Energy flux of electromagnetic field:S=μ01E×B=E×H
Direction indicates energy flow; magnitude gives power per unit area (W/m2)
Average intensity for sinusoidal waves: ⟨S⟩=21cε0E02—connects field amplitude to measurable intensity
Compare: Wave Equation vs. Poynting Vector—the wave equation tells you how EM waves propagate, while the Poynting vector tells you where the energy goes. On problems involving radiation pressure or antenna power, you'll need Poynting.
Mathematical Tools: Potentials and Conservation
These formulas simplify calculations and express fundamental conservation laws. Essential for advanced problem-solving.
Electromagnetic Potentials
Scalar potential ϕ and vector potential A define fields: E=−∇ϕ−∂t∂A and B=∇×A
Simplifies complex geometries and is essential for quantum electrodynamics where potentials are more fundamental than fields
Continuity Equation
Charge conservation in differential form:∂t∂ρ+∇⋅J=0
Physical meaning: rate of charge decrease in a region equals current flowing out—charge is neither created nor destroyed
Directly derivable from Maxwell's Equations—not an independent assumption but a consequence of the theory
Compare: Potentials vs. Fields—fields (E, B) are directly measurable, while potentials (ϕ, A) are mathematical conveniences with gauge freedom. However, potentials are often easier to calculate and are fundamental in quantum mechanics (Aharonov-Bohm effect).
Material Response and Circuits
These formulas describe how matter interacts with electromagnetic fields. Critical for real-world applications.
Ohm's Law
Current-voltage relationship:V=IR or in field form J=σE
Conductivity σ (inverse of resistivity ρr) characterizes material response to applied fields
Microscopic origin: collisions between charge carriers and lattice ions create effective resistance
Polarization and Magnetization
Electric polarization:P=ε0χeE, leading to D=ε0E+P=εE
Magnetization:M=χmH, leading to B=μ0(H+M)=μH
Susceptibilitiesχe and χm encode material properties—dielectrics, paramagnets, diamagnets, ferromagnets
Boundary Conditions
Tangential components:E1t=E2t and H1t−H2t=Kf (surface free current)
Normal components:D1n−D2n=σf (surface free charge) and B1n=B2n
Essential for reflection/refraction problems—derive Fresnel equations, Snell's law, and waveguide modes
Compare: Ohm's Law vs. Polarization/Magnetization—Ohm's Law describes dissipative response (energy lost to heat), while polarization and magnetization describe reactive response (energy stored in fields). Both modify how fields behave in materials.
Quick Reference Table
Concept
Key Formulas
Maxwell's Equations
Gauss's Law, Gauss's Law for Magnetism, Faraday's Law, Ampère-Maxwell Law
Which two of Maxwell's Equations involve curl operations, and what physical phenomena do they describe?
You need to find the magnetic field from a short, straight wire segment. Would you use Ampère's Law or the Biot-Savart Law, and why?
Compare and contrast: How does the Lorentz force from an electric field differ from that of a magnetic field in terms of the work done on a charged particle?
The Poynting vector and the wave equation both describe electromagnetic waves. If an FRQ asks about the intensity of sunlight at Earth's surface, which formula is more directly useful?
Explain why the displacement current term in Ampère-Maxwell Law is essential for the existence of electromagnetic waves in vacuum, where there are no real currents.