Critical Proteomics Databases

Why This Matters

Proteomics databases aren't just digital filing cabinets—they're the infrastructure that makes modern protein science possible. When you're tested on this material, you're being evaluated on your understanding of how data flows through the research ecosystem, from raw mass spectrometry files to curated functional annotations. These databases represent different stages of that pipeline: some store raw experimental data, others compile validated identifications, and still others layer on biological context like tissue expression or disease associations.

The key to mastering this topic is recognizing that each database serves a distinct purpose in the proteomics workflow. Don't just memorize names and URLs—know whether a database handles raw data submission, peptide/protein identification, functional annotation, or structural modeling. Understanding these categories will help you answer questions about experimental design, data validation, and how researchers move from instrument output to biological insight.

---

Raw Data Repositories

These databases serve as primary archives for mass spectrometry data, enabling reproducibility and re-analysis of proteomics experiments. They prioritize data preservation and standardized formats over biological interpretation.

PRIDE (PRoteomics IDEntifications Database)

• Primary repository for mass spectrometry proteomics data—the go-to destination for depositing raw files and processed results from MS experiments
• Standardized submission formats ensure data can be validated and re-analyzed by other researchers, supporting reproducibility in the field
• Part of the ProteomeXchange consortium, meaning submissions here automatically become discoverable across multiple partner databases

MassIVE (Mass Spectrometry Interactive Virtual Environment)

• Open-access MS data repository with emphasis on interactive visualization and collaborative analysis tools
• Supports both raw data and processed results, allowing researchers to share complete experimental workflows
• Facilitates data re-analysis through built-in tools, making it valuable for meta-analyses and method development

Global Proteome Machine Database (GPMDB)

• Focuses on large-scale MS data analysis and storage—optimized for handling massive datasets from high-throughput experiments
• Provides specialized search tools for mining proteomics results across thousands of experiments
• Supports community data sharing, enabling researchers to compare their findings against accumulated evidence

---

Data Exchange and Integration

This category represents the connective tissue of proteomics informatics—frameworks that ensure databases can communicate and share data seamlessly.

ProteomeXchange

• Consortium rather than a single database—coordinates data exchange across PRIDE, MassIVE, and other repositories
• Standardized submission framework means one deposit can be discoverable across multiple platforms simultaneously
• Promotes transparency and reproducibility by ensuring proteomics data meets community standards before publication

---

Compiled Identification Resources

These databases aggregate and validate protein/peptide identifications from multiple experiments, building consensus views of the proteome. They transform scattered experimental observations into reliable reference catalogs.

PeptideAtlas

• Compiles peptide identifications from thousands of MS experiments—creates a unified map of which peptides have been reliably detected
• Builds evidence-based proteome coverage by tracking how often and in what contexts each protein has been observed
• Essential for experimental design—helps researchers know which peptides are detectable before running new experiments

ProteomicsDB

• Integrates human proteomics data from multiple sources into a single searchable platform
• Tracks protein expression levels, modifications, and interactions—goes beyond simple identification to functional context
• User-friendly visualization tools make it accessible for researchers without bioinformatics expertise

---

Curated Knowledge Bases

These resources provide deep functional annotation and biological context, integrating experimental data with literature-derived knowledge. They answer "what does this protein do?" rather than "was this protein detected?"

UniProt (Universal Protein Resource)

• The gold standard for protein sequence and functional annotation—if you need to know what a protein does, start here
• Curated entries (Swiss-Prot) include expert-reviewed functional descriptions, while TrEMBL provides automated annotations for broader coverage
• Integrated analysis tools including BLAST and sequence alignment make it a one-stop resource for protein characterization

neXtProt

• Human-focused knowledge platform that builds on UniProt with additional functional and disease annotations
• Integrates literature, database cross-references, and experimental data to provide comprehensive protein profiles
• Particularly strong on disease associations and protein variants—valuable for translational research applications

---

Expression and Localization Mapping

These databases focus on where and when proteins are expressed, connecting molecular identifications to tissue and cellular context. They bridge the gap between detecting a protein and understanding its biological role.

Human Protein Atlas

• Maps protein expression across human tissues and cell types—answers "where is this protein found in the body?"
• Integrates transcriptomics and proteomics data with immunohistochemistry images for multi-level evidence
• Disease-focused sections highlight proteins relevant to cancer and other pathologies, supporting biomarker discovery

---

Structural Resources

Structural databases provide 3D models and structural predictions that help explain protein function through molecular architecture. Structure determines function—these resources make that connection visible.

SWISS-MODEL Repository

• Houses protein structure models generated through homology modeling—predicts 3D structure based on similar proteins with known structures
• Provides model quality metrics so users can assess reliability before using structures for downstream analysis
• Valuable when experimental structures aren't available—fills gaps in structural coverage of the proteome

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two databases would you use to both deposit raw mass spectrometry data AND ensure it's discoverable across multiple platforms? What role does ProteomeXchange play in this process?

2. A researcher wants to know which tissues express a particular protein and see immunohistochemistry images. Which database is their best starting point, and how does it differ from ProteomicsDB?

3. Compare and contrast UniProt and neXtProt: what types of research questions would lead you to choose one over the other?

4. If you needed to design an MS experiment and wanted to know which peptides from your target protein have been reliably detected in previous studies, which database would you consult and why?

5. Explain the difference between a raw data repository (like PRIDE) and a curated knowledge base (like UniProt). At what stages of a research project would each be most valuable?