Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Biophysics exams don't just ask you to name techniques—they test whether you understand when and why to use each method. You're being tested on your ability to match a biological question (What's the structure? How does it move? What does it bind?) to the right experimental approach. The techniques in this guide represent the core toolkit for probing biomolecular structure, dynamics, interactions, and function at scales ranging from single atoms to entire cellular systems.
Think of these methods as falling into distinct categories based on what they reveal: high-resolution structure, molecular dynamics, binding thermodynamics, mechanical properties, or electrical behavior. When you encounter an exam question about studying a membrane protein complex or measuring binding affinity, you need to immediately know which technique fits—and why alternatives might fail. Don't just memorize what each technique does; know what physical principle it exploits and what limitations constrain its use.
These techniques answer the fundamental question: what does this molecule look like at atomic resolution? Each exploits different physical phenomena—X-ray diffraction, nuclear spin states, or electron scattering—to reconstruct three-dimensional architecture.
Compare: X-ray crystallography vs. Cryo-EM—both yield high-resolution 3D structures, but crystallography requires ordered crystals while cryo-EM captures molecules in solution. If an FRQ asks about studying a large, flexible membrane complex, cryo-EM is almost always your answer.
Structure alone doesn't explain function—molecules must move, fold, and change shape. These techniques capture the dynamic behavior that drives biological activity.
Compare: CD spectroscopy vs. NMR for dynamics—CD gives rapid, low-resolution snapshots of secondary structure changes, while NMR provides atomic-detail dynamics but requires more sample and time. Use CD for screening, NMR for mechanistic depth.
Understanding how molecules recognize and bind each other is central to biochemistry. These techniques quantify binding affinity, specificity, and the thermodynamic forces driving complex formation.
Compare: ITC vs. FRET for binding studies—ITC provides rigorous thermodynamic parameters in solution but requires micromolar concentrations, while FRET works in live cells at physiological concentrations but requires fluorescent labeling. Choose based on whether you need quantitative thermodynamics or cellular context.
Some biological questions require measuring physical forces—how stiff is a protein? How strongly do cells adhere? These techniques probe the mechanical world of biomolecules.
Compare: AFM vs. optical tweezers (single-molecule techniques)—both measure forces on individual molecules, but AFM excels at surface imaging and works on stiffer samples, while optical tweezers provide gentler manipulation ideal for studying motor proteins and nucleic acid mechanics.
Cells are electrical systems. These techniques measure the currents and voltages that underlie neural signaling, muscle contraction, and cellular homeostasis.
Compare: Electrophysiology vs. fluorescence imaging for studying ion channels—electrophysiology provides direct, quantitative current measurements with millisecond resolution, while calcium/voltage-sensitive dyes enable spatial mapping across many cells simultaneously. Patch-clamp gives mechanistic detail; imaging gives population context.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Atomic-resolution structure | X-ray crystallography, Cryo-EM, NMR |
| Solution-state dynamics | NMR, CD spectroscopy, single-molecule techniques |
| No crystallization required | Cryo-EM, NMR, AFM |
| Binding thermodynamics | ITC, mass spectrometry |
| Live-cell imaging | Fluorescence microscopy, electrophysiology |
| Single-molecule analysis | AFM, optical tweezers, single-molecule fluorescence |
| Membrane protein structure | Cryo-EM, NMR (with special methods) |
| Post-translational modifications | Mass spectrometry |
You need to determine the structure of a 500 kDa membrane protein complex that resists crystallization. Which technique is most appropriate, and why would X-ray crystallography and NMR both be problematic?
Compare ITC and FRET as methods for studying protein-protein interactions. What type of information does each provide, and under what experimental conditions would you choose one over the other?
A researcher wants to study how a chaperone protein helps a client protein fold in real-time. Which two techniques from this guide could capture the dynamic folding process, and what different information would each provide?
An FRQ asks you to design an experiment measuring how a drug affects sodium channel function. Which technique would you use, and what specific parameters could you measure?
Why might a structural biologist use CD spectroscopy before attempting cryo-EM or X-ray crystallography? What preliminary information does CD provide that guides downstream structural studies?