Crisis Response Models

Why This Matters

Crisis response models aren't just theoretical frameworks—they're the decision-making blueprints that determine whether an organization survives a scandal, disaster, or public relations nightmare. You're being tested on your ability to recognize when to apply each model, why certain strategies work better than others, and how organizations move through crisis stages. The exam expects you to distinguish between models that focus on communication strategy, those that emphasize lifecycle stages, and those built around operational phases.

Don't just memorize the names and creators of these models. Instead, focus on understanding what problem each model solves: Is it about what to say (communication-focused)? When to act (lifecycle models)? Or what to do (operational frameworks)? When you can categorize a model by its core purpose, you'll be able to apply it correctly in case studies and FRQ scenarios. Master the underlying logic, and the specific tactics will make sense.

---

Communication and Reputation Models

These models address the strategic messaging challenge: what should an organization say, and how should it say it? The core principle is that communication choices directly shape stakeholder perception and organizational reputation.

Situational Crisis Communication Theory (SCCT)

• Match your response to your responsibility—SCCT's central insight is that crisis type determines communication strategy, not the other way around
• Attribution of blame drives stakeholder reactions; organizations perceived as responsible face harsher judgment and need more accommodative responses
• Three crisis clusters (victim, accidental, preventable) help categorize situations and select appropriate response intensity

Coombs' Crisis Response Strategies

• Four strategy categories (denial, diminishment, rebuilding, bolstering) form a spectrum from defensive to accommodative responses
• Stakeholder expectations must guide timing and tone; mismatched responses damage credibility more than the original crisis
• Transparency and accountability serve as force multipliers—they enhance the effectiveness of whatever primary strategy you choose

---

Image Restoration Frameworks

These models focus specifically on repairing organizational reputation after damage has occurred. The underlying mechanism is that public perception can be actively managed through strategic communication choices.

Image Restoration Theory

• Five broad strategy categories give organizations a toolkit for reputation repair, ranging from outright denial to full corrective action
• Public perception determines success—a technically sound strategy fails if audiences don't find it credible or appropriate
• Strategy selection depends on the gap between organizational actions and stakeholder expectations

Benoit's Image Restoration Strategies

• Audience analysis is the critical first step; the same crisis requires different messaging for customers, employees, regulators, and media
• Denial and evasion tactics (shifting blame, minimizing severity) work only when evidence supports them—otherwise they backfire catastrophically
• Corrective action and mortification (accepting responsibility, promising change) are highest-risk but highest-reward strategies for severe crises

---

Lifecycle and Stage Models

These models map how crises evolve over time, helping organizations understand where they are in a crisis and what comes next. The key insight is that crises are predictable processes, not random events, and each stage demands different priorities.

Three-Stage Model of Crisis Management

• Pre-crisis preparation (planning, training, early warning systems) is where most crisis outcomes are actually determined
• Crisis response focuses on execution—implementing plans, communicating with stakeholders, and containing damage
• Post-crisis learning closes the loop through evaluation and improvement, making the organization more resilient for future events

Fink's Crisis Lifecycle Model

• Prodromal stage (warning signs) offers the best intervention opportunity—problems addressed here never become full crises
• Acute and chronic stages distinguish between the immediate emergency and the prolonged aftermath, each requiring different resource allocation
• Resolution stage marks the return to normalcy, but monitoring continues to prevent recurrence or secondary crises

Turner's Six-Stage Model of Crisis Development

• Six distinct stages provide granular detail: pre-crisis, triggering event, crisis, resolution, recovery, and learning
• Triggering event analysis helps organizations understand the specific catalyst that transformed a risk into an active crisis
• Proactive prevention is emphasized throughout—understanding each stage helps identify intervention points before escalation

---

Operational and Emergency Management Frameworks

These models emphasize practical actions and resource deployment rather than communication strategy. They're built on the principle that crisis management requires systematic processes, not just reactive decisions.

FEMA's Four Phases of Emergency Management

• Mitigation, preparedness, response, recovery form a continuous cycle, not a linear sequence—organizations should be working on all four simultaneously
• Community involvement distinguishes this model; it assumes crises affect entire systems, not just individual organizations
• Resource allocation and coordination across agencies is the central operational challenge, especially for large-scale emergencies

The 4R's Model (Reduction, Readiness, Response, Recovery)

• Reduction focuses on eliminating or minimizing risks before they materialize—this is proactive crisis management
• Readiness emphasizes capability building: training, equipment, plans, and relationships that enable effective response
• Continuous improvement is built into the model; each crisis becomes data for enhancing future performance

---

Integrated and Collaborative Models

These models emphasize coordination across stakeholders and the interconnected elements required for effective crisis management. The core principle is that no organization manages a crisis alone.

The 5C's Crisis Management Model

• Five elements (communication, coordination, collaboration, capacity, community) must work together—weakness in any one undermines the others
• Stakeholder relationships built before a crisis determine how effectively organizations can coordinate during one
• Capacity building addresses the resource and capability gaps that cause response failures, from trained personnel to communication infrastructure

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Categorization: If an organization faces a crisis where they are clearly at fault (preventable crisis cluster), which two models would you combine to diagnose the situation and select a response strategy?

2. Compare and Contrast: How do Fink's Lifecycle Model and Turner's Six-Stage Model differ in their approach to understanding crisis progression, and when might you choose one framework over the other?

3. Application: A company's CEO is caught in a financial scandal. Using Benoit's Image Restoration Strategies, which tactics would likely backfire, and which offer the best chance of reputation recovery? Explain your reasoning.

4. Synthesis: What do FEMA's Four Phases, the 4R's Model, and the Three-Stage Model all have in common regarding how they treat crisis management—and how does this shared assumption differ from purely communication-focused models?

5. FRQ Practice: An organization failed to respond effectively to a product safety crisis. Using the 5C's Model, identify which of the five elements most likely broke down and explain how strengthening that element would improve future crisis response.