Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) isn't just a feel-good add-on—it's a strategic framework that connects directly to the core concepts you'll be tested on in sustainable business. When exam questions ask about stakeholder theory, triple bottom line accounting, or shared value creation, they're really asking whether you understand how companies balance profit with purpose. CSR strategies demonstrate how businesses internalize externalities, respond to stakeholder pressure, and build competitive advantage through ethical differentiation.
The strategies below illustrate key principles: stakeholder engagement, systems thinking, transparency mechanisms, and value chain responsibility. Don't just memorize what each strategy involves—know which business sustainability concept each one demonstrates. If an FRQ asks you to evaluate how a company creates shared value, you need to connect specific CSR approaches to measurable social and business outcomes.
These strategies recognize that businesses exist within a web of relationships. Stakeholder theory argues that long-term success depends on creating value for all parties affected by business operations, not just shareholders.
Compare: Stakeholder Engagement vs. Transparency and Reporting—both build trust with external parties, but engagement is interactive (dialogue-based) while transparency is informational (disclosure-based). FRQs may ask which approach better addresses specific stakeholder concerns.
These strategies focus on the people inside the organization. The resource-based view suggests that human capital—properly developed and valued—becomes a source of sustainable competitive advantage.
Compare: Employee Well-Being vs. Diversity Programs—both improve workplace culture, but well-being focuses on individual support while diversity focuses on systemic representation. Strong CSR integrates both for maximum impact.
These strategies extend CSR beyond company boundaries. Supply chain accountability recognizes that a company's social and environmental footprint includes all upstream and downstream activities.
Compare: Ethical Supply Chain vs. Human Rights Protection—ethical supply chain is the mechanism (audits, standards, sourcing), while human rights protection is a specific focus area within that mechanism. Exam questions may ask you to explain how supply chain management addresses human rights concerns.
These strategies address the ecological dimension of the triple bottom line. Environmental sustainability initiatives internalize externalities that traditional accounting ignores, reducing both ecological harm and long-term business risk.
These strategies create value beyond the firm's direct operations. Shared value theory argues that addressing social problems can simultaneously advance business interests when approached strategically.
Compare: Community Investment vs. Philanthropy—community investment creates structural change (jobs, infrastructure) while philanthropy provides resource transfer (donations, volunteer time). Investment typically generates more sustainable impact; philanthropy offers more flexibility. FRQs often ask which approach better demonstrates shared value creation.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Stakeholder Theory | Stakeholder Engagement, Transparency and Reporting |
| Human Capital Development | Employee Well-Being, Diversity and Inclusion |
| Supply Chain Accountability | Ethical Supply Chain Management, Human Rights Protection |
| Triple Bottom Line (Environmental) | Environmental Sustainability Initiatives, Responsible Product Development |
| Shared Value Creation | Community Investment, Strategic Philanthropy |
| Risk Mitigation | Transparency and Reporting, Ethical Supply Chain Management |
| Competitive Differentiation | Diversity Programs, Responsible Product Development |
Which two CSR strategies most directly address supply chain accountability, and how do their approaches differ?
If asked to evaluate how a company creates shared value rather than just charitable impact, which strategies would provide your strongest examples and why?
Compare and contrast stakeholder engagement and transparency and reporting as mechanisms for building trust—when would you recommend each approach?
A company faces criticism for labor conditions at overseas suppliers. Which CSR strategies would you recommend they strengthen, and in what sequence?
How do employee well-being programs and diversity initiatives both contribute to sustainable competitive advantage, and what does each uniquely offer that the other doesn't?