Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Triangle congruence is the foundation of geometric proof—it's how you establish that two figures are exactly the same in both shape and size. When you're asked to prove relationships in geometry, you're almost always working backward from a congruence criterion to unlock additional information about sides and angles. The criteria you'll learn here (SSS, SAS, ASA, AAS, and HL) aren't just random rules; they represent the minimum information needed to guarantee two triangles are identical.
You're being tested on your ability to select the right criterion for a given situation and apply it strategically in proofs. Don't just memorize the acronyms—understand what each one requires, why it works, and when to use it. The real skill is recognizing which criterion fits the information you're given, then leveraging CPCTC to prove whatever the problem actually asks for.
These criteria prioritize side measurements as the primary evidence for congruence. When you know enough about the sides, the angles are forced to match.
Compare: SSS vs. HL—both rely primarily on side measurements, but HL requires fewer pieces of information because the right angle constrains the triangle's shape. If a proof involves right triangles, check for HL first; it's often the fastest path.
These criteria use a mix of side and angle measurements. The key is whether the angle is "included" (sandwiched between the sides) or not.
Compare: ASA vs. AAS—both use two angles and one side, but ASA requires the side between the angles while AAS uses a side outside them. On proofs, identify whether your known side is included or not, then select the matching criterion.
These aren't congruence criteria themselves—they're logical properties that help you build congruence arguments and extend your conclusions.
Compare: Reflexive vs. Transitive—reflexive deals with a figure and itself, while transitive links three different figures. Both appear frequently in multi-step proofs, so know when each applies.
Once you've established triangle congruence, these tools let you extract additional information.
Compare: Congruence criteria vs. CPCTC—the criteria (SSS, SAS, etc.) establish that triangles are congruent, while CPCTC applies that congruence to prove something about individual parts. Think of criteria as the door and CPCTC as what's behind it.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Side-only criteria | SSS, HL |
| Included element required | SAS (included angle), ASA (included side) |
| Non-included element | AAS |
| Right triangles only | HL |
| Shared elements in proofs | Reflexive Property |
| Chaining congruence | Transitive Property |
| Extracting part relationships | CPCTC |
| Flexible ordering | Symmetric Property |
You know two triangles have two pairs of congruent sides and one pair of congruent angles. What additional information do you need to determine whether SAS or AAS applies?
Which two congruence criteria both require exactly two angles? How do they differ in what side information they need?
A proof involves two triangles that share side . Which property justifies using this side as evidence for both triangles, and how would you write the congruence statement?
Compare and contrast SSS and HL: What do they have in common, and why does HL require fewer pieces of information?
In a two-column proof, you've just written " by ASA." The problem asks you to prove . What is your next statement and justification?