Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Compressible flow equations form the mathematical backbone of high-speed aerodynamics, propulsion systems, and gas dynamics. You're being tested on your ability to apply conservation principles when density can no longer be treated as constant—a fundamental shift from the incompressible assumptions you've seen before. These equations govern everything from shock wave behavior to nozzle design to duct flow with friction and heat transfer, and understanding when and how to apply each one separates surface-level memorization from genuine problem-solving ability.
The key insight is that compressible flow introduces coupling between thermodynamic and fluid dynamic variables. Pressure, density, temperature, and velocity all become interdependent through the equation of state and energy conservation. Master the underlying physics—isentropic processes, shock discontinuities, friction effects, and heat addition mechanisms—and you'll be equipped to tackle any problem the exam throws at you. Don't just memorize formulas; know which physical scenario each equation set describes and what assumptions it requires.
Every compressible flow analysis begins with the fundamental conservation laws. These equations express mass, momentum, and energy balance in forms that account for variable density—the defining characteristic of compressible flow.
Compare: Continuity vs. Energy equation—both are scalar conservation laws, but continuity tracks mass flux while energy tracks enthalpy flux. On FRQs involving nozzles, you'll typically need both: continuity for mass flow rate, energy for temperature changes.
The conservation equations alone don't close the system—you need relationships connecting pressure, density, and temperature. These constitutive relations complete the mathematical framework.
Compare: Equation of state vs. Speed of sound—the equation of state is a thermodynamic identity valid in any process, while the speed of sound specifically assumes isentropic (reversible, adiabatic) wave propagation. Both use , but for different physical reasons.
When flow is both adiabatic (no heat transfer) and reversible (no shocks or friction), entropy remains constant. These idealized conditions yield elegant closed-form relationships widely used in preliminary design.
Compare: Isentropic relations vs. Prandtl-Meyer expansion—both assume reversible, adiabatic flow, but isentropic relations describe quasi-1D channel flow while Prandtl-Meyer handles 2D supersonic turning. If asked about supersonic nozzle design, use isentropic relations; for flow over airfoil surfaces, use Prandtl-Meyer.
When supersonic flow decelerates abruptly, conservation laws must still hold across the discontinuity—but entropy increases irreversibly. Shock relations connect upstream and downstream states through algebraic jumps.
Compare: Normal shock vs. Prandtl-Meyer expansion—both occur in supersonic flow, but shocks are compression waves with entropy generation while expansions are isentropic. Shocks decelerate flow ( decreases); expansions accelerate it ( increases). This distinction is heavily tested.
Real internal flows involve friction and heat transfer, which modify the isentropic picture. Fanno and Rayleigh flows isolate these effects to reveal their individual influences on flow properties.
Compare: Fanno vs. Rayleigh flow—both involve irreversibilities that drive flow toward sonic conditions, but through different mechanisms. Fanno (friction) keeps constant; Rayleigh (heat transfer) changes . Exam problems often ask you to identify which model applies based on physical setup.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Mass conservation | Continuity equation, quasi-1D mass flux |
| Momentum balance | Euler equations, Navier-Stokes |
| Energy conservation | Total enthalpy, stagnation temperature |
| Thermodynamic closure | Equation of state, speed of sound |
| Isentropic processes | Isentropic relations, Prandtl-Meyer expansion |
| Shock discontinuities | Normal shock equations, Rankine-Hugoniot |
| Friction effects | Fanno flow equations |
| Heat transfer effects | Rayleigh flow equations |
Which two equation sets both predict that flow will approach , and what physical mechanism drives this choking in each case?
Compare and contrast normal shock waves and Prandtl-Meyer expansions: which conserves stagnation pressure, and why does the other not?
If you're analyzing a converging-diverging nozzle operating at design conditions with no shocks, which equation set provides the area-Mach relationship, and what assumptions does it require?
The energy equation introduces stagnation temperature . Under what two duct flow conditions does remain constant, and under what condition does it change?
An FRQ describes supersonic flow entering a constant-area duct with significant wall friction. Which flow model applies, what happens to the Mach number, and what happens to the stagnation pressure?