Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Digital signal processing algorithms form the computational backbone of everything from streaming audio to medical imaging. In this course, you're being tested on more than just knowing what each algorithm does—you need to understand why we choose one approach over another, how transforms relate to each other mathematically, and what trade-offs engineers face when processing real-world signals. These algorithms demonstrate core principles like time-frequency duality, computational efficiency, filter stability, and multi-resolution analysis.
The algorithms below aren't just isolated techniques; they're interconnected tools that build on Fourier theory. The FFT makes the DFT practical, convolution connects filtering to frequency response, and wavelets extend Fourier analysis to handle signals that change over time. Don't just memorize definitions—know what problem each algorithm solves and when you'd reach for one tool instead of another.
These algorithms convert signals from the time domain to the frequency domain, revealing spectral content that's hidden in raw samples. The core principle: any signal can be decomposed into sinusoidal components, and working in the frequency domain often simplifies analysis and processing.
Compare: DFT vs. DCT—both decompose signals into frequency components, but DCT uses only cosines and produces real outputs for real inputs. DCT's superior energy compaction makes it the go-to for compression, while DFT (via FFT) dominates general spectral analysis. If an FRQ asks about image compression, DCT is your answer.
Filters modify signals by attenuating or amplifying specific frequency components. The key distinction: how the filter uses past outputs (feedback) determines its impulse response length, stability, and phase characteristics.
Compare: FIR vs. IIR—both are digital filters, but FIR guarantees stability and linear phase at the cost of efficiency, while IIR achieves sharper responses with fewer computations but risks instability and phase distortion. Exam tip: if a question emphasizes phase preservation, FIR is the answer; if it emphasizes efficiency, think IIR.
These operations are the building blocks that connect time-domain processing to frequency-domain analysis. Understanding convolution and correlation is essential because they underpin filtering, system analysis, and signal detection.
Compare: Convolution vs. Correlation—both slide one signal across another, but convolution time-reverses one signal (for filtering) while correlation doesn't (for similarity measurement). In the frequency domain, convolution corresponds to multiplication, correlation to multiplication by the conjugate.
Real-world signals are finite, and how we handle their boundaries dramatically affects frequency analysis. Windowing addresses the fundamental tension between frequency resolution and spectral leakage.
Changing the sampling rate of a digital signal requires careful handling to avoid aliasing or artifacts. These operations are essential for interfacing systems with different sample rates and for efficient multi-rate processing.
Compare: Decimation vs. Interpolation—both change sample rate, but decimation risks aliasing (filter before downsampling) while interpolation creates imaging artifacts (filter after upsampling). Remember: the lowpass filter goes on the "high rate" side of the operation.
When signals have frequency content that changes over time, fixed-resolution Fourier analysis falls short. Wavelets provide adaptive time-frequency resolution, trading off temporal and spectral precision based on frequency.
Compare: FFT vs. Wavelet Transform—FFT gives excellent frequency resolution but no time localization (you know what frequencies exist, not when). Wavelets sacrifice some frequency precision to gain time localization, making them superior for transient detection and signals with time-varying spectra.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Time-to-frequency conversion | DFT, FFT, DCT |
| Computational efficiency | FFT, IIR filtering |
| Linear phase filtering | FIR filtering |
| Sharp frequency response with few coefficients | IIR filtering |
| Signal comparison and delay estimation | Correlation (cross and auto) |
| Filtering implementation | Convolution, FIR, IIR |
| Reducing spectral leakage | Windowing (Hamming, Hanning, Blackman) |
| Sample rate conversion | Decimation, Interpolation |
| Time-varying frequency analysis | Wavelet Transform |
| Compression applications | DCT, Wavelet Transform |
Both FFT and DCT convert signals to the frequency domain. What property makes DCT preferable for image compression, and why doesn't standard DFT share this advantage?
You need to design a filter that preserves the shape of a pulse waveform exactly. Should you choose FIR or IIR, and what specific property justifies your choice?
Compare convolution and correlation: how do they differ mathematically, and what different applications does each serve?
A student applies the DFT to a finite signal and observes unexpected high-frequency components that weren't in the original. What phenomenon is this, and which technique would reduce it?
An FRQ asks you to analyze an ECG signal where the heart rate varies over time. Why would wavelet analysis be more appropriate than a standard FFT, and what trade-off does the wavelet transform make to achieve this capability?