upgrade
upgrade

⚗️Analytical Chemistry

Common Analytical Instruments

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Analytical instruments are the backbone of modern chemistry—they're how we answer fundamental questions about what's in a sample, how much is there, and what's its structure. On exams, you're being tested on more than just instrument names. You need to understand which technique fits which analytical problem, the underlying physical principles each method exploits, and when to choose one approach over another. These concepts connect directly to topics like molecular structure, quantitative analysis, spectroscopic transitions, and separation science.

Don't just memorize what each instrument does—know why it works and when you'd reach for it. Can you explain why NMR reveals molecular connectivity while IR identifies functional groups? Do you understand why GC handles volatile compounds but HPLC is better for thermally unstable ones? That comparative thinking is exactly what FRQs and multiple-choice questions test. Master the principles, and the instrument details will stick.


Spectroscopic Methods: Probing Molecular Structure Through Light-Matter Interactions

Spectroscopy exploits how molecules absorb, emit, or scatter electromagnetic radiation. Different regions of the electromagnetic spectrum probe different molecular properties—electronic transitions, vibrational modes, or nuclear spin states—giving complementary structural information.

UV-Visible Spectrophotometer

  • Measures electronic transitions—electrons jumping between molecular orbitals when absorbing UV or visible light (190–800 nm range)
  • Beer-Lambert Law (A=εbcA = \varepsilon bc) enables quantitative analysis by relating absorbance to concentration
  • Ideal for conjugated systems and colored compoundsthe more extended the conjugation, the longer the wavelength absorbed

Infrared (IR) Spectrometer

  • Detects molecular vibrations—stretching and bending of bonds produce characteristic absorption bands in the IR region
  • Functional group identification is the primary strength; carbonyl stretch near 1700 cm11700 \text{ cm}^{-1}, O-H broad stretch near 3300 cm13300 \text{ cm}^{-1}
  • Qualitative analysis workhorse—fingerprint region (below 1500 cm11500 \text{ cm}^{-1}) provides unique molecular identification

Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectrometer

  • Exploits nuclear spin states—nuclei like 1H^1\text{H} and 13C^{13}\text{C} absorb radiofrequency radiation in a magnetic field
  • Chemical shift and splitting patterns reveal molecular connectivity, neighboring atoms, and stereochemistry
  • 2D techniques (COSY, HSQC) map through-bond and through-space correlations for complex structure elucidation

Compare: UV-Vis vs. IR vs. NMR—all are absorption spectroscopies, but they probe different molecular properties. UV-Vis reveals electronic structure and conjugation, IR identifies functional groups through vibrations, and NMR maps atomic connectivity. If an FRQ asks you to fully characterize an unknown organic compound, you'd typically need all three.


Mass Spectrometry: Molecular Identification Through Mass-to-Charge Analysis

Mass spectrometry ionizes molecules and separates them based on their mass-to-charge ratio (m/zm/z). Unlike spectroscopy, MS doesn't require light absorption—it directly measures molecular mass and fragmentation patterns.

Mass Spectrometer

  • Determines molecular weight precisely—the molecular ion peak (M+M^+) gives the compound's mass
  • Fragmentation patterns act as structural fingerprints; specific bond cleavages reveal functional groups and connectivity
  • Ionization methods matter—EI causes extensive fragmentation while ESI and MALDI preserve intact molecules for biomolecule analysis

Compare: NMR vs. Mass Spectrometry—both provide structural information, but NMR shows how atoms are connected while MS shows what mass fragments form. NMR is non-destructive and works in solution; MS requires ionization and is extremely sensitive (femtomole detection). For protein identification, MS is often preferred; for small molecule structure determination, NMR is typically more informative.


Separation Techniques: Resolving Complex Mixtures Before Detection

Chromatography separates mixture components based on differential partitioning between mobile and stationary phases. The key is matching the technique to your analyte's properties—volatility, polarity, thermal stability.

Gas Chromatograph (GC)

  • Requires volatile, thermally stable analytes—compounds must vaporize without decomposition (typically boiling point below 300°C)
  • Separation occurs in a heated column—analytes partition between an inert carrier gas (mobile phase) and a liquid/solid stationary phase
  • GC-MS coupling is the gold standard for volatile compound identification—separation followed by mass spectral fingerprinting

High-Performance Liquid Chromatograph (HPLC)

  • Handles non-volatile and thermally labile compounds—ideal for pharmaceuticals, peptides, and polar molecules
  • High-pressure pumping forces liquid mobile phase through packed columns, achieving superior resolution
  • Detector flexibility—UV, fluorescence, refractive index, or MS detection depending on analyte properties

Compare: GC vs. HPLC—both are chromatographic separations, but GC requires volatility while HPLC works for virtually any soluble compound. GC offers faster analysis and higher resolution for suitable analytes; HPLC is more versatile. If asked to analyze a thermally unstable drug metabolite, HPLC is your answer; for environmental volatile organic compounds (VOCs), choose GC.


Elemental Analysis: Quantifying Metals and Trace Elements

These techniques focus on atomic rather than molecular analysis—breaking samples down to constituent elements and measuring their concentrations. The principle involves exciting or ionizing atoms and detecting characteristic emissions or absorptions.

Atomic Absorption Spectrometer (AAS)

  • Single-element technique—measures absorption of element-specific wavelengths by ground-state atoms in a flame or graphite furnace
  • Exceptional sensitivity for metals—detection limits in the ppb range for most elements
  • Matrix-matched standards required—calibration must account for sample matrix effects on atomization efficiency

Inductively Coupled Plasma (ICP) Spectrometer

  • Multi-element capability—argon plasma at 600010000 K6000–10000 \text{ K} ionizes virtually all elements simultaneously
  • ICP-OES vs. ICP-MS—optical emission measures light from excited atoms; mass spectrometry measures ionized atoms for even greater sensitivity
  • Wider dynamic range than AAS—can quantify major, minor, and trace elements in a single run

Compare: AAS vs. ICP—both quantify metals, but AAS analyzes one element at a time while ICP handles dozens simultaneously. AAS is simpler and cheaper for routine single-element work; ICP is preferred for multi-element surveys or when ultra-trace detection is needed. Environmental water analysis often uses ICP for comprehensive metal screening.


Solid-State and Surface Analysis: Characterizing Materials Structure

Some analytical problems require understanding crystalline structure or solid-state properties rather than molecular identity. X-ray diffraction exploits the wave nature of X-rays and their interaction with periodic atomic arrangements.

X-ray Diffractometer (XRD)

  • Bragg's Law governs diffractionnλ=2dsinθn\lambda = 2d\sin\theta relates X-ray wavelength, lattice spacing, and diffraction angle
  • Phase identification compares diffraction patterns to databases; each crystalline phase has a unique fingerprint
  • Quantitative phase analysis and crystallite size—peak positions identify phases while peak broadening reveals particle dimensions

Compare: XRD vs. spectroscopic methods—XRD requires crystalline order and reveals long-range atomic arrangement, while NMR and IR work on any phase and reveal molecular structure. For identifying a pharmaceutical polymorph (same molecule, different crystal packing), XRD is essential; for confirming the molecular structure itself, use NMR.


Electrochemical Methods: Analyzing Redox-Active Species

Electrochemical techniques measure electrical properties arising from electron transfer reactions. These methods are particularly powerful for studying reaction kinetics, determining ion concentrations, and analyzing redox-active species.

Electrochemical Analyzers (Potentiometer, Voltammeter)

  • Potentiometry measures equilibrium potential—ion-selective electrodes (like pH electrodes) determine ion concentrations via the Nernst equation
  • Voltammetry applies controlled potential—current response reveals redox potentials, reaction mechanisms, and kinetics
  • Low cost and field-portable—electrochemical sensors are ideal for on-site environmental monitoring and clinical point-of-care testing

Compare: Electrochemical vs. spectroscopic quantitation—both can determine concentrations, but electrochemical methods directly measure electron transfer while spectroscopy measures light absorption. Electrochemical techniques excel for redox-active species and offer real-time monitoring; spectroscopy works for any light-absorbing analyte regardless of redox activity.


Quick Reference Table

Analytical ProblemBest Instrument(s)
Functional group identificationIR Spectrometer
Molecular connectivity/structureNMR Spectrometer
Molecular weight determinationMass Spectrometer
Quantifying colored compoundsUV-Vis Spectrophotometer
Separating volatile mixturesGas Chromatograph (GC)
Separating non-volatile/polar compoundsHPLC
Trace metal quantitation (single element)AAS
Multi-element analysisICP-OES or ICP-MS
Crystal structure/phase identificationXRD
Ion concentration/redox behaviorElectrochemical Analyzers

Self-Check Questions

  1. You need to determine whether an unknown organic liquid contains a carbonyl group. Which two instruments would give you complementary information, and what would each reveal?

  2. A pharmaceutical company needs to verify that their drug crystallized in the correct polymorph. Why would XRD be preferred over NMR for this analysis?

  3. Compare GC-MS and LC-MS: what types of analytes is each best suited for, and what fundamental property determines which you'd choose?

  4. An environmental lab receives water samples for comprehensive heavy metal screening. Would you recommend AAS or ICP, and what's the key advantage of your choice?

  5. If an FRQ asks you to propose a complete analytical scheme for identifying an unknown organic compound and determining its concentration in solution, which instruments would you include and in what order? Justify your choices based on the information each provides.