upgrade
upgrade

🖨️Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing

Common 3D Printing Materials

Study smarter with Fiveable

Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.

Get Started

Why This Matters

Selecting the right material is arguably the most critical decision in any 3D printing project—and it's exactly where exam questions love to test your understanding. You're not just being asked to recall material names; you're being tested on why certain materials suit specific applications, how their properties affect print settings, and what tradeoffs engineers must consider when choosing between options. Understanding material science fundamentals—thermal behavior, mechanical properties, chemical resistance, and processability—will help you connect individual materials to broader manufacturing principles.

The materials covered here span the full spectrum of additive manufacturing technologies, from entry-level FDM filaments to industrial metal powders. Each category demonstrates key concepts like polymer chain behavior, composite reinforcement, and post-processing requirements. Don't just memorize what each material is made of—know what problem it solves and when you'd choose it over alternatives.


Beginner-Friendly Thermoplastics

These materials form the foundation of desktop 3D printing. They offer forgiving print characteristics and demonstrate how glass transition temperature and crystallinity affect both processing and final part performance.

PLA (Polylactic Acid)

  • Biodegradable thermoplastic derived from renewable resources—corn starch or sugarcane provides the base polymer, making it the most environmentally friendly common filament
  • Low warping and easy bed adhesion make it ideal for beginners; prints reliably at 180220°C180–220°C without a heated bed
  • Limited heat resistance (softens around 60°C60°C) restricts functional applications—prototypes and display models only

PETG (Polyethylene Terephthalate Glycol)

  • Bridges the gap between PLA ease and ABS durability—the glycol modification prevents crystallization, improving layer adhesion and clarity
  • Chemical and moisture resistance makes it suitable for outdoor applications, food containers, and mechanical parts
  • Glossy finish with minimal warping—requires slightly higher temps (230250°C230–250°C) but tolerates imperfect settings better than ABS

Compare: PLA vs. PETG—both print easily on basic machines, but PETG offers superior durability and weather resistance at the cost of slightly trickier stringing. If an FRQ asks about material selection for outdoor functional parts on a budget printer, PETG is your answer.


High-Performance Engineering Thermoplastics

When parts must survive real-world mechanical stress, heat, or repeated use, these materials deliver. They demonstrate how molecular structure and intermolecular forces translate to measurable engineering properties.

ABS (Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene)

  • Excellent impact strength and heat resistance—the butadiene rubber component provides toughness; withstands temperatures up to 100°C100°C
  • Requires heated bed (90110°C90–110°C) and enclosure to prevent warping; differential cooling causes internal stresses that curl edges
  • Emits styrene fumes during printing—ventilation mandatory, limiting home use but standard in industrial settings

Nylon (Polyamide)

  • Outstanding strength-to-weight ratio with natural flexibility—hydrogen bonding between polymer chains creates exceptional toughness for gears, bearings, and hinges
  • Hygroscopic material absorbs atmospheric moisture—must be stored in sealed containers with desiccant; wet filament causes bubbling and weak layers
  • High warping tendency requires heated bed and adhesion aids—often printed on specialty surfaces like Garolite or with glue stick

Compare: ABS vs. Nylon—both serve functional applications, but ABS offers easier processing while Nylon provides superior wear resistance and flexibility. For mechanical components under repeated stress, Nylon wins; for general-purpose durable parts, ABS is more forgiving.


Flexible and Specialty Filaments

These materials expand what's possible with FDM printing by introducing elastomeric properties and composite reinforcement. They require modified print settings and often specialized hardware.

TPU (Thermoplastic Polyurethane)

  • Rubber-like elasticity with excellent abrasion resistance—Shore hardness ranges from 60A (very soft) to 95A (semi-rigid), enabling phone cases to industrial seals
  • Requires direct drive extruder and slow print speedsthe flexible filament buckles in Bowden tube systems, causing jams
  • Outstanding durability for wearables and protective gear—absorbs impact energy rather than cracking, unlike rigid plastics

Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Filaments

  • Base polymer (PLA, PETG, or Nylon) infused with chopped carbon fibers—increases stiffness and reduces weight without changing print temperature significantly
  • Dramatically improves dimensional stabilityfibers reduce shrinkage and warping, making large prints more reliable
  • Abrasive to standard brass nozzles—requires hardened steel or ruby nozzles; fiber orientation affects strength (strongest along print lines)

Wood-Filled Filaments

  • PLA matrix with wood fiber particles creates authentic wood appearance—can be sanded, stained, and finished like natural wood
  • Temperature affects color—higher nozzle temps produce darker "burnt" appearance; enables artistic effects within single prints
  • Prone to nozzle clogs from fibrous content—requires larger nozzle diameter (0.5mm≥0.5mm) and careful retraction settings

Compare: TPU vs. Carbon Fiber Nylon—opposite ends of the flexibility spectrum. TPU absorbs energy through deformation; carbon fiber composites resist deformation entirely. Choose based on whether your application needs compliance (TPU) or rigidity (carbon fiber).


Resin-Based Materials

Stereolithography (SLA) and Digital Light Processing (DLP) use photopolymer resins that cure under UV light. These demonstrate photochemical crosslinking rather than thermal processing, enabling resolution impossible with filament extrusion.

Resin (for SLA/DLP Printing)

  • Achieves layer heights as fine as 25μm25μm—liquid resin cures precisely where UV light hits, producing smooth surfaces and intricate details
  • Multiple formulations for different applications—standard, flexible, tough, castable (for jewelry), and dental-certified resins available
  • Requires post-processing workflowuncured resin must be washed in isopropyl alcohol, then UV-cured to reach final mechanical properties; adds time and equipment costs

Compare: FDM filaments vs. SLA resins—filaments offer material variety and lower cost; resins provide superior detail and surface finish. For miniatures and jewelry, resin wins; for functional prototypes, FDM is typically more practical.


Industrial Powders

Powder bed fusion technologies enable materials impossible to extrude, including metals and ceramics. These processes demonstrate sintering and melting mechanisms that transform loose powder into fully dense parts.

Metal Powders (for DMLS/SLM)

  • Enables fully dense metal parts with complex internal geometries—titanium, aluminum, stainless steel, and Inconel powders fused by high-powered lasers (200W1kW200W–1kW)
  • Aerospace and medical industries drive adoption—lattice structures reduce weight while maintaining strength; patient-specific implants now routine
  • Requires specialized facilities and safety protocolsfine metal powders are combustible and respiratory hazards; post-processing includes stress relief, support removal, and surface finishing

Ceramic Powders

  • Produces parts with extreme heat and chemical resistance—alumina, zirconia, and silicon carbide survive environments that destroy metals and polymers
  • Two-stage process: printing then sinteringgreen parts are fragile until fired at high temperature (12001600°C1200–1600°C) to achieve final density
  • Brittle failure mode requires design adaptation—sharp corners and thin sections concentrate stress; ceramic parts need generous fillets and uniform wall thickness

Compare: Metal vs. Ceramic powders—both require expensive equipment and post-processing, but metals offer ductility and toughness while ceramics provide thermal and chemical stability. Turbine blades might use either depending on specific operating conditions.


Quick Reference Table

ConceptBest Examples
Beginner-friendly printingPLA, PETG
High heat resistanceABS, Nylon, Ceramics
Functional mechanical partsABS, Nylon, Carbon Fiber composites
Flexible/elastic applicationsTPU
Maximum detail and surface finishResin (SLA/DLP)
Lightweight high-strengthCarbon Fiber filaments, Metal powders (titanium)
Outdoor/chemical exposurePETG, Nylon, Ceramics
Requires post-processingResin, Metal powders, Ceramic powders

Self-Check Questions

  1. Which two materials would you compare when discussing the tradeoff between print ease and functional durability for a hobbyist printer? What specific properties differ?

  2. A design engineer needs to produce a lightweight bracket that will experience repeated impact loading. Compare carbon fiber-reinforced Nylon and TPU—which is appropriate and why?

  3. What shared challenge do Nylon and ceramic powders face during storage or handling, and how does this affect the printing workflow for each?

  4. An FRQ asks you to recommend a material for detailed architectural models that will be displayed indoors. Identify two viable options and explain the tradeoffs between them.

  5. Compare the post-processing requirements of SLA resin prints versus DMLS metal prints. What does each process accomplish, and why can't the parts be used directly off the build plate?