Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Cloud cost management isn't just about saving money—it's a core architectural competency that demonstrates your understanding of resource elasticity, pricing models, and operational efficiency. When you're tested on cloud architecture, examiners want to see that you can design systems that are both performant and economically sustainable. The techniques in this guide connect directly to fundamental cloud principles: pay-as-you-go pricing, horizontal scaling, and shared responsibility models.
These optimization strategies also reveal how well you understand the relationship between workload characteristics, instance types, and billing structures. Don't just memorize that reserved instances save money—know why commitment-based pricing exists and when each technique applies. The real exam questions will ask you to recommend the right optimization strategy for a given scenario, not simply list techniques.
Cloud providers reward predictable usage with discounted rates because it helps them forecast capacity needs.
Compare: Reserved Instances vs. Savings Plans—both reward commitment with discounts, but Savings Plans offer greater flexibility while Reserved Instances provide capacity guarantees. If a scenario requires guaranteed availability in a specific AZ, Reserved Instances are your answer.
Matching resources to actual demand eliminates waste from over-provisioning while ensuring performance during peaks.
Compare: Auto-scaling vs. Spot Instances—auto-scaling adjusts quantity based on demand, while spot instances reduce unit cost. Combine them: use spot instances within an auto-scaling group for maximum savings on interruptible workloads.
Selecting appropriately sized resources prevents paying for capacity you don't use.
Compare: Right-sizing vs. Storage Tiering—both eliminate waste, but right-sizing addresses compute resources while tiering optimizes storage. FRQ tip: if asked about cost optimization for a data lake, storage tiering is your primary lever.
Design decisions made early in development have compounding effects on operational costs.
Compare: Serverless vs. Auto-scaling EC2—both handle variable demand, but serverless scales to zero (no baseline cost) while EC2 maintains minimum instances. Choose serverless for sporadic, unpredictable workloads; EC2 for sustained, predictable traffic.
You can't optimize what you can't measure—cost visibility enables accountability and informed decisions.
Compare: Tagging vs. Monitoring Tools—tagging enables cost attribution (who spent it), while monitoring reveals usage patterns (how it was spent). Both are required for mature cost governance; neither alone is sufficient.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Commitment-based discounts | Reserved Instances, Savings Plans |
| Demand-based scaling | Auto-Scaling, Spot Instances |
| Resource right-sizing | Instance right-sizing, Storage tiering |
| Architectural efficiency | Serverless computing, Data transfer optimization |
| Cost visibility | Tagging, Cost management tools, Usage monitoring |
| Variable workload optimization | Spot Instances, Serverless, Auto-scaling |
| Predictable workload optimization | Reserved Instances, Savings Plans |
| Data cost reduction | Storage tiering, CDNs, Compression |
A company runs batch processing jobs that can tolerate interruptions and have flexible completion times. Which two techniques would provide the greatest cost savings, and why?
Compare Reserved Instances and Savings Plans: what trade-off does each represent between discount depth and flexibility?
An application experiences predictable daily traffic spikes from 9 AM to 5 PM but minimal usage overnight. Which combination of optimization techniques would you recommend?
Why might a well-tagged environment with cost allocation reports still fail to achieve cost optimization? What additional techniques are required?
A startup is building a new event-driven application with unpredictable traffic patterns. Compare the cost implications of serverless architecture versus an auto-scaling EC2 deployment—which scenarios favor each approach?