Circuit analysis is the backbone of AP Physics C: E&M—it's where all your knowledge of electric potential, resistance, and energy storage comes together into practical problem-solving. You're being tested on your ability to apply conservation laws, differential equations, and equivalent circuit methods to predict how real circuits behave. The exam loves asking you to analyze transient responses in RC and LR circuits, find equivalent resistances in complex networks, and explain energy transfer between components.
Don't just memorize formulas—understand why each technique works. Kirchhoff's laws stem from conservation principles you've seen throughout physics. Thévenin and Norton equivalents let you simplify circuits so you can focus on what matters. When you see an FRQ with a multi-loop circuit or an inductor switching on, you need to know which tool to grab and how to set up the problem. Master the underlying concepts, and the math will follow.
Conservation Laws: The Foundation of Circuit Analysis
Every circuit analysis technique ultimately traces back to two conservation laws: conservation of charge and conservation of energy. These aren't just abstract principles—they give you concrete equations you can solve.
Kirchhoff's Current Law (KCL)
Conservation of charge at a junction—the total current entering any node must equal the total current leaving
Mathematical form:∑Iin=∑Iout at every junction in the circuit
Application: Essential for nodal analysis and any circuit with branching current paths
Kirchhoff's Voltage Law (KVL)
Conservation of energy around a closed loop—the sum of all potential differences equals zero
Mathematical form:∑ΔV=0 around any closed path, including resistors, capacitors, inductors, and EMF sources
Application: The foundation for mesh analysis and setting up differential equations for LR and RC transients
Ohm's Law
Relates voltage, current, and resistance—I=RΔV for ohmic materials with constant resistance
Power forms:P=IΔV=I2R=R(ΔV)2 connect current flow to energy dissipation
Limitation: Only applies to ohmic materials—non-ohmic devices like diodes require different analysis
Compare: KCL vs. KVL—both are conservation laws, but KCL applies at junctions (charge conservation) while KVL applies around loops (energy conservation). FRQs often require you to use both simultaneously to solve for multiple unknowns.
Series and Parallel Simplification
Before reaching for advanced techniques, always check if you can reduce the circuit using series and parallel combinations. This is often the fastest path to a solution.
Series Circuit Analysis
Same current through all components—current has only one path, so I is identical everywhere in series
Voltages add:Vtotal=V1+V2+... and resistances add: Req=R1+R2+...
Voltage divider rule:Vx=RtotalRx⋅Vs gives voltage across any series resistor directly
Parallel Circuit Analysis
Same voltage across all branches—all components share the same potential difference
Currents add:Itotal=I1+I2+... and resistances combine as: Req1=R11+R21+...
Current divider rule:Ix=RxReq⋅Itotal determines current through any parallel branch
Compare: Series vs. parallel resistors—in series, the largest resistor dominates total resistance and drops the most voltage. In parallel, the smallest resistor dominates (lower equivalent resistance) and carries the most current. Know which configuration increases or decreases total resistance.
Equivalent Circuit Methods
When series/parallel reduction isn't enough, these theorems let you replace complex networks with simpler equivalents. The circuit behaves identically from the load's perspective.
Thévenin's Theorem
Any linear circuit reduces to a voltage source Vth in series with resistance Rth—seen from two terminals
Finding Vth: Open-circuit voltage between terminals; Finding Rth: Deactivate sources and find equivalent resistance
Power: Simplifies load analysis—once you have the Thévenin equivalent, changing the load only requires one simple calculation
Norton's Theorem
Any linear circuit reduces to a current source IN in parallel with resistance RN—equivalent to Thévenin
Conversion:IN=RthVth and RN=Rth—choose whichever form simplifies your problem
Best for: Circuits where you're adding parallel loads or analyzing current distribution
Source Transformation
Convert between voltage and current sources—a voltage source Vs in series with R equals a current source Is=RVs in parallel with R
Reversible: Works in both directions, allowing you to choose the most convenient form
Strategy: Use repeatedly to combine sources and simplify complex networks before applying other techniques
Compare: Thévenin vs. Norton—mathematically equivalent, but Thévenin (voltage source) is often easier for series loads, while Norton (current source) is better for parallel loads. The exam may ask you to find both or convert between them.
Systematic Analysis Methods
For circuits that can't be simplified by inspection, these systematic approaches give you a structured way to set up and solve equations.
Nodal Analysis
Apply KCL at each node—write current equations in terms of node voltages using I=RVa−Vb
Reference node: Choose one node as ground (V=0) to reduce the number of unknowns
Advantage: Particularly efficient when you have fewer nodes than loops or many parallel elements
Mesh Analysis
Apply KVL around each mesh—write voltage equations using mesh currents that circulate around closed loops
Mesh current: A hypothetical current that flows around one loop; actual branch currents are sums/differences of mesh currents
Advantage: Best for planar circuits with many loops; gives you currents directly
Superposition Principle
Analyze one source at a time—deactivate all other sources (voltage sources → short circuit, current sources → open circuit)
Add results algebraically—total response equals the sum of individual responses from each source
Requirement: Only works for linear circuits—resistors, capacitors, and inductors (not diodes or transistors)
Compare: Nodal vs. mesh analysis—nodal analysis solves for voltages using KCL, while mesh analysis solves for currents using KVL. Choose based on what you need to find and which gives fewer equations. For circuits with current sources, nodal is often easier; for voltage sources, mesh may be simpler.
Special Network Transformations
Some resistor configurations can't be reduced using simple series/parallel rules. These transformations handle those cases.
Delta-Wye (Δ-Y) Transformation
Converts between three-resistor configurations—delta (triangle) to wye (star) or vice versa
Δ to Y:R1=Ra+Rb+RcRbRc where R1 is opposite to Ra in the delta
Application: Essential for bridge circuits and three-phase systems that resist series/parallel simplification
Maximum Power Transfer Theorem
Maximum power delivered when RL=Rsource—the load resistance matches the source's internal resistance
Efficiency tradeoff: At maximum power transfer, efficiency is only 50%—half the power dissipates in the source
Design implication: Used in signal applications (audio, RF) where power transfer matters more than efficiency
Compare: Delta-Wye transformation vs. series/parallel—use Δ-Y only when you encounter a bridge configuration or three resistors that share no common node for series/parallel reduction. It's a last resort, not a first choice.
Transient Behavior: RC and LR Circuits
When circuits contain capacitors or inductors, time-dependent behavior becomes critical. The exam frequently tests your ability to write and solve differential equations for these transients.
Capacitor Behavior in Circuits
Stores energy in electric field:U=21CV2; opposes instantaneous voltage changes
RC time constant:τ=RC determines how quickly the capacitor charges or discharges
Stores energy in magnetic field:U=21LI2; opposes instantaneous current changes
LR time constant:τ=RL governs current rise and decay rates
Transient equations: Current growth: I(t)=RE(1−e−t/τ); Current decay: I(t)=I0e−t/τ
LC Circuit Oscillations
Energy oscillates between capacitor and inductor—no resistor means no energy loss (ideal case)
Angular frequency:ω=LC1; behaves like simple harmonic motion with q(t)=Q0cos(ωt)
Maximum current:Imax=LCQ0 occurs when all energy transfers from capacitor to inductor
Compare: RC vs. LR transients—both follow exponential curves with time constant τ, but capacitors resist voltage changes while inductors resist current changes. At t=0, a capacitor acts like a short circuit (if uncharged) or voltage source (if charged), while an inductor acts like an open circuit (if current was zero) or current source (if current was flowing).
Quick Reference Table
Concept
Best Examples
Conservation of charge
KCL, nodal analysis, current divider
Conservation of energy
KVL, mesh analysis, voltage divider
Equivalent circuits
Thévenin, Norton, source transformation
Series/parallel simplification
Voltage divider, current divider, Req calculations
Network transformations
Delta-Wye, maximum power transfer
Transient analysis (exponential)
RC circuits, LR circuits, time constant τ
Oscillatory behavior
LC circuits, ω=1/LC
Systematic methods
Nodal analysis, mesh analysis, superposition
Self-Check Questions
A circuit has three resistors: two in parallel, and that combination in series with a third. If you want to maximize current through the third resistor, should you increase or decrease the parallel resistors' values? Why?
Which two techniques—Thévenin's theorem and superposition—both require you to "deactivate" sources at some point? Explain how the deactivation differs between them.
An LR circuit with L=2 H and R=100 Ω is connected to a battery. After how many time constants will the current reach approximately 95% of its final value?
Compare and contrast how a capacitor and an inductor behave at t=0 when a switch closes in a DC circuit. What does each component "look like" to the rest of the circuit?
You're given a complex circuit with a bridge configuration (five resistors, none simply in series or parallel). Which analysis technique must you use before you can apply series/parallel reduction, and why do standard methods fail here?