Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Chromatography is the backbone of analytical chemistry—it's how scientists separate, identify, and quantify the components of complex mixtures. Whether you're analyzing drug purity, detecting environmental contaminants, or isolating proteins for research, you're being tested on your ability to select the right technique for the job. Exam questions won't just ask you to define these methods; they'll present scenarios where you must justify why one approach works better than another based on analyte properties, separation mechanisms, and detection requirements.
The key to mastering this topic is understanding that all chromatography works on the same fundamental principle: differential partitioning between mobile and stationary phases. What varies is how that partitioning occurs—whether through volatility, polarity, size, charge, or specific binding interactions. Don't just memorize method names—know what physical or chemical property each technique exploits and when that property matters most.
These techniques use a gaseous mobile phase to separate compounds based on their volatility and interactions with the stationary phase. They're your go-to methods when analytes can be vaporized without decomposing.
Compare: GC vs. GLC—GLC is actually a subset of GC where the stationary phase is specifically a liquid coating. If an exam asks about "gas chromatography," assume it includes GLC unless stated otherwise. The distinction matters when discussing how separation occurs at the molecular level.
When analytes are non-volatile, thermally unstable, or too polar for gas-phase analysis, liquid mobile phases become essential. These methods vary primarily in how the stationary phase interacts with analytes.
Compare: HPLC vs. SFC—both handle non-volatile compounds, but SFC offers faster analysis and greener solvent use. HPLC remains more versatile for highly polar analytes. If an FRQ asks about separating heat-sensitive chiral drugs, SFC is your best answer.
These techniques spread the stationary phase across a flat surface rather than packing it into a column. They're rapid, visual, and cost-effective—perfect for quick qualitative analysis.
Compare: TLC vs. Paper Chromatography—both are planar and inexpensive, but TLC offers better resolution and faster development times. Paper chromatography is limited to water-soluble analytes. For exam purposes, TLC is the "real" analytical tool; paper chromatography is the teaching demonstration.
These techniques exploit unique properties of biological macromolecules—size, charge, and specific binding interactions. They're essential in biochemistry, biotechnology, and clinical diagnostics.
Compare: SEC vs. IEX vs. Affinity—these three methods separate proteins by completely different properties (size, charge, specific binding). A well-designed purification scheme often uses all three sequentially. If an FRQ asks about purifying an enzyme from cell lysate, describe a multi-step strategy using these complementary techniques.
| Separation Principle | Best Methods | Ideal Analytes |
|---|---|---|
| Volatility/boiling point | GC, GLC | Small organic molecules, gases, petrochemicals |
| Polarity/solubility | HPLC, Column, TLC | Pharmaceuticals, organic synthesis products |
| Molecular size | SEC | Proteins, polymers, macromolecules |
| Ionic charge | IEX | Proteins, nucleic acids, amino acids |
| Specific binding | Affinity | Tagged proteins, antibodies, enzymes |
| Supercritical properties | SFC | Chiral compounds, thermally labile drugs |
| Quick qualitative screening | TLC, Paper | Reaction monitoring, purity checks |
A pharmaceutical company needs to separate two enantiomers of a heat-sensitive drug. Which chromatography method would you recommend, and why does it outperform HPLC for this application?
Compare and contrast SEC and IEX: both purify proteins, but what fundamentally different molecular property does each exploit? When would you use them in sequence?
You're monitoring an organic reaction and need quick, visual confirmation that starting material is being consumed. Which two planar methods could you use, and why is one clearly superior for this purpose?
A GC analysis fails because the analyte decomposes at the injection temperature. Identify two alternative chromatography methods and explain what property of the analyte makes each one appropriate.
Your target protein has a His-tag and a of 6.5. Design a two-step purification using affinity chromatography and one other method—explain the separation principle for each step and the order you'd use them.