Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Chord progressions aren't just sequences of chordsโthey're the emotional architecture of music. When you understand why certain progressions work, you unlock the ability to analyze any song, compose with intention, and recognize patterns across centuries of music. You're being tested on your ability to identify harmonic function, understand voice leading principles, and explain how progressions create tension, resolution, and emotional movement.
The progressions in this guide demonstrate core concepts like tonic-dominant relationships, circle-of-fifths motion, and the interplay between major and relative minor tonalities. Don't just memorize the Roman numeralsโknow what each progression does harmonically and why composers and songwriters reach for it. That's what separates surface-level recall from real theoretical understanding.
These progressions establish the most fundamental harmonic relationships in tonal music. The movement from dominant (V) to tonic (I) creates the strongest sense of resolution in Western harmony.
Compare: I-V-I vs. I-IV-V-Iโboth resolve to tonic, but adding IV creates a longer harmonic journey with pre-dominant tension. If an exam asks about harmonic function, I-IV-V-I demonstrates all three functions (tonic, subdominant, dominant) in one progression.
These progressions prioritize stepwise motion between chord tones, creating seamless harmonic flow. Circle-of-fifths root movement (down a fifth or up a fourth) produces the smoothest voice leading in tonal harmony.
Compare: ii-V-I vs. I-vi-ii-Vโthe turnaround simply extends the circle-of-fifths chain backward. Both prioritize smooth voice leading, but the turnaround adds length and the emotional color of the relative minor (vi).
These progressions balance major and minor tonalities by incorporating the vi chord (relative minor). The relationship between I and viโsharing two common tonesโallows seamless shifts between bright and melancholic moods.
Compare: I-V-vi-IV vs. vi-IV-I-Vโsame four chords in different rotations. Starting on I feels resolved and bright; starting on vi feels unresolved and introspective. Exam tip: these are modal rotations of the same progression, demonstrating how starting point affects perceived tonic.
These progressions use longer chord sequences to create sustained harmonic journeys. Extended progressions build complexity while maintaining clear tonal direction.
Compare: I-V-vi-IV vs. I-IV-vi-Vโswapping chord positions 2 and 4 changes the harmonic rhythm and bass line contour. Both balance major/minor, but the voice leading between chords differs significantly.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Authentic cadence / V-I resolution | I-V-I, I-IV-V-I |
| Circle-of-fifths motion | ii-V-I, I-vi-ii-V |
| Primary triads only | I-IV-V-I, I-V-I |
| Relative minor integration | I-V-vi-IV, I-vi-IV-V, vi-IV-I-V |
| Blues/dominant seventh color | I-IV-V7 |
| Smooth voice leading | ii-V-I, I-vi-ii-V |
| Modal rotation / starting-point ambiguity | I-V-vi-IV vs. vi-IV-I-V |
| Extended harmonic sequences | I-V-vi-iii-IV-I-IV-V |
Which two progressions demonstrate circle-of-fifths root motion, and how does this motion affect voice leading?
Compare I-V-vi-IV and vi-IV-I-V: they use the same chords, so why do they create different emotional effects?
What harmonic function does the ii chord serve in ii-V-I, and why is this progression preferred over IV-V-I in jazz?
If you needed to demonstrate the difference between authentic cadence and plagal motion on an exam, which progressions would you use as examples?
The I-vi-ii-V turnaround and the 50s progression (I-vi-IV-V) both feature the vi chord in position 2โwhat distinguishes their harmonic purposes and typical genre associations?