Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Characterization is the backbone of literary analysis—and you're being tested on your ability to identify how authors reveal who their characters are, not just what those characters are like. Whether you're analyzing a novel, short story, or drama, understanding characterization techniques allows you to write stronger analytical essays, identify authorial intent, and connect character development to broader themes like identity, power, morality, and social dynamics.
Here's the key insight: authors rarely use just one technique. They layer direct statements with subtle behavioral cues, symbolic imagery, and dialogue patterns to create complex, believable characters. Your job is to recognize these techniques in action and explain their effect on meaning. Don't just memorize the list below—know what each technique reveals and why an author might choose one method over another.
The most fundamental distinction in characterization is whether the author tells you directly or makes you figure it out. This shapes how actively engaged readers must be and how much interpretive work the text demands.
Compare: Direct vs. Indirect Characterization—both reveal character traits, but direct characterization tells while indirect characterization shows. On analytical essays, you'll score higher by analyzing indirect methods because they require interpretation and demonstrate close reading skills.
These techniques rely on observable, external details—what characters look like, say, and do. They're often the most accessible entry points for analysis because the evidence is concrete and quotable.
Compare: Dialogue vs. Actions—both are external and observable, but they can work together or in tension. When a character's words don't match their behavior, you've found dramatic irony or hypocrisy—exactly what FRQ prompts love to ask about.
These techniques grant access to a character's private mental and emotional life—the thoughts, memories, and feelings hidden from other characters. They create intimacy and often generate reader sympathy.
Compare: Thoughts vs. Background—both are internal, but thoughts reveal present psychology while background explains its origins. Strong analytical essays connect the two: how does this character's past explain their current internal conflict?
Characters don't exist in isolation. These techniques reveal character through relationships, contrasts, and the responses they provoke in others.
Compare: Reactions of Others vs. Symbolism—both are indirect, but reactions come from within the story world while symbolism is an authorial tool operating above the narrative. Analyzing symbolism demonstrates your ability to identify craft choices.
This technique focuses on change over time—the difference between who a character is at the beginning versus the end of a narrative.
Compare: Character Arc vs. Actions—individual actions reveal character in the moment, while arc reveals character across the narrative. Essay prompts asking about "development" or "change" require you to trace the arc, not just describe isolated behaviors.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Explicit Revelation | Direct characterization |
| Implicit Revelation (STEAL) | Indirect characterization, Dialogue, Actions, Thoughts, Physical description, Reactions of others |
| External/Observable Evidence | Physical description, Dialogue, Actions and behavior |
| Internal/Psychological Evidence | Thoughts and internal monologue, Character background and history |
| Relational Techniques | Reactions of other characters, Dialogue |
| Authorial Craft | Symbolism and metaphors, Direct characterization |
| Change Over Time | Character arc and development |
A character insists they value honesty but repeatedly lies to protect their reputation. Which two characterization techniques are in tension here, and what does this reveal?
You're asked to analyze how an author develops a complex character. Which techniques would provide the strongest textual evidence for an analytical essay—and why?
Compare and contrast how dialogue and internal monologue function differently. In what situation might an author use both for the same character in the same scene?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how a character's past influences their present choices, which characterization techniques should you focus on, and how do they work together?
A minor character appears only briefly but is described in vivid physical detail with heavy symbolic imagery. Why might an author use direct, external techniques rather than developing this character's thoughts or backstory?