Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Every photograph you take is fundamentally a record of light—and exposure settings are how you control exactly how much light reaches your camera's sensor and what that light does to your image. Understanding these settings isn't just about getting a "properly lit" photo; it's about making deliberate creative choices. You're being tested on your ability to predict how changing one setting affects others, why certain combinations work for specific situations, and how to troubleshoot when images don't turn out as expected.
The concepts here connect to broader principles of light behavior, sensor technology, and visual storytelling. When you understand the relationship between aperture, shutter speed, and ISO, you gain control over motion, focus, and image quality simultaneously. Don't just memorize what each setting does—know when and why you'd choose one combination over another, and be ready to explain the trade-offs involved.
These three settings work together as an interconnected system. Changing one requires compensating with another to maintain the same exposure level. Think of it like a three-way seesaw—push one down, and the others must adjust.
Compare: Aperture vs. Shutter Speed—both control light quantity, but aperture affects spatial sharpness (depth of field) while shutter speed affects temporal sharpness (motion). If asked to isolate a moving subject from a busy background, you need both: wide aperture for blur behind, fast shutter to freeze the subject.
Before you can fix exposure problems, you need to identify them. These tools help you assess whether your settings are achieving the results you want.
Compare: Evaluative vs. Spot Metering—evaluative averages the whole scene (great for landscapes), while spot lets you expose precisely for one element (essential for a face against a bright window). Know which to choose based on where the important tones are in your composition.
Sometimes your camera's automatic calculations need overriding, or you need to capture more dynamic range than a single exposure allows.
Compare: Exposure Compensation vs. Bracketing—compensation shifts your single exposure brighter or darker, while bracketing captures multiple exposures to combine later. Use compensation when you know what you want; use bracketing when the scene's dynamic range exceeds your sensor's capability.
These settings affect image appearance beyond simple brightness—they shape color accuracy and where viewers focus their attention.
Compare: White Balance vs. Exposure—both affect how your image looks, but exposure controls brightness while white balance controls color. A properly exposed image can still look wrong if white balance is off, and vice versa. Check both when troubleshooting.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Controlling light quantity | Aperture, Shutter Speed, ISO |
| Motion rendering | Shutter Speed (fast freezes, slow blurs) |
| Background blur/sharpness | Aperture, Depth of Field |
| Low-light shooting | ISO, Wide Aperture, Slow Shutter |
| Exposure evaluation | Histogram, Metering Modes |
| Correcting meter errors | Exposure Compensation, Spot Metering |
| Expanding dynamic range | Bracketing, HDR techniques |
| Color accuracy | White Balance |
You're photographing a friend against a bright window. Which metering mode should you use, and why might you also need exposure compensation?
Compare the creative effects of changing aperture versus changing shutter speed. If you want to blur a waterfall's motion while keeping rocks sharp throughout the frame, which settings work together?
Your histogram shows data pushed hard against the right edge. What problem does this indicate, and which settings could you adjust to fix it?
Explain why raising ISO is often called a "last resort" adjustment. What trade-off are you accepting when you increase ISO sensitivity?
A landscape photographer and a portrait photographer both want maximum control over their backgrounds. How would their aperture choices differ, and what depth of field effect is each trying to achieve?