Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
When you're tested on Buddhist schools of thought, you're not just being asked to match names with regions—you're being assessed on your understanding of how Buddhism adapted and diversified as it spread across Asia. The key concepts here involve soteriological approaches (paths to liberation), the role of texts and practice, and lay versus monastic accessibility. These schools represent fundamentally different answers to the question: What is the fastest, most effective, or most inclusive path to enlightenment?
Understanding the distinctions between schools also reveals how religion interacts with culture, politics, and philosophy. A Theravada monastery in Thailand operates on different assumptions than a Pure Land temple in Japan—not because one is "more Buddhist," but because each tradition prioritized different aspects of the Buddha's teachings. Don't just memorize which school is where—know why each school developed its particular approach and what problem it was trying to solve.
These traditions prioritize the earliest Buddhist teachings and place responsibility for enlightenment squarely on the individual practitioner. The underlying principle is that liberation comes through personal discipline, meditation, and ethical conduct—no shortcuts, no external saviors.
Compare: Madhyamaka vs. Yogacara—both are Mahayana philosophical schools, but Madhyamaka focuses on the emptiness of phenomena while Yogacara focuses on the nature of consciousness. If an FRQ asks about Buddhist philosophy's influence on practice, these two provide the theoretical foundations.
Mahayana ("Great Vehicle") traditions shift the goal from individual enlightenment to liberating all sentient beings. The Bodhisattva—a being who delays their own final liberation to help others—becomes the spiritual ideal.
Compare: Chan vs. Zen—essentially the same tradition adapted to different cultural contexts. Chan developed in China with Daoist influences; Zen flourished in Japan and shaped samurai culture. Both reject excessive reliance on scriptures in favor of direct meditative insight.
These traditions democratized Buddhism by offering paths to liberation that don't require years of monastic training or advanced meditation practice. The key principle is that faith, devotion, and simple practices can be just as effective as rigorous discipline.
Compare: Pure Land vs. Nichiren—both offer accessible practices for lay Buddhists (chanting/recitation), but Pure Land focuses on rebirth in another realm through Amitabha's grace, while Nichiren emphasizes transformation in this life through the Lotus Sutra's power. Both emerged as responses to the belief that we live in a degenerate age (mappō) when traditional practices are insufficient.
Vajrayana ("Diamond Vehicle") traditions incorporate tantric practices, rituals, and symbolic systems designed to accelerate the path to enlightenment. The underlying principle is that with proper initiation and guidance, practitioners can achieve in one lifetime what might otherwise take countless rebirths.
Compare: Vajrayana vs. Tibetan Buddhism—Vajrayana is the broader tantric tradition found across Asia; Tibetan Buddhism is a specific regional expression that combines Vajrayana with unique Tibetan elements like the tulku (reincarnated lama) system. Not all Vajrayana is Tibetan, but Tibetan Buddhism is thoroughly Vajrayana.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Individual enlightenment / Arhat ideal | Theravada |
| Bodhisattva ideal / Universal liberation | Mahayana, Chan, Zen |
| Devotional / Faith-based practice | Pure Land, Nichiren |
| Esoteric / Tantric methods | Vajrayana, Tibetan Buddhism |
| Meditation-centered practice | Theravada, Chan, Zen |
| Philosophical foundations | Madhyamaka (emptiness), Yogacara (consciousness) |
| Lay accessibility | Pure Land, Nichiren |
| Cultural synthesis with local traditions | Tibetan Buddhism, Chan, Zen |
Compare and contrast the Theravada arhat ideal with the Mahayana Bodhisattva ideal. What different assumptions about the purpose of spiritual practice do they reflect?
Which two Buddhist schools emphasize direct meditative insight over textual study, and what is their historical relationship to each other?
A student claims that Pure Land and Nichiren Buddhism are essentially the same because both involve chanting. What key soteriological difference would you point out?
How do Madhyamaka and Yogacara differ in their philosophical focus, and why are both considered foundational to Mahayana thought?
If an FRQ asked you to explain how Buddhism adapted to local cultures as it spread across Asia, which three schools would provide the strongest examples, and what specific adaptations would you cite?