Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Every bridge you'll analyze in this course ultimately transfers its loads to the ground—and how that transfer happens determines whether a structure stands for centuries or fails catastrophically. Foundation selection isn't just about soil mechanics; it's about understanding the interplay between load magnitude, soil conditions, water presence, and construction constraints. You're being tested on your ability to match foundation types to site conditions and explain why one solution works where another would fail.
The concepts here connect directly to geotechnical analysis, structural load paths, and construction methodology—all core exam topics. When you encounter foundation problems, think in terms of load transfer mechanisms, depth requirements, and site-specific challenges. Don't just memorize that drilled shafts go deep; know when you'd choose them over driven piles and why that distinction matters for bridge performance.
When competent soil exists near the surface, engineers can distribute loads across a wide area without drilling deep. The key principle: increase bearing area to reduce contact pressure below the soil's allowable capacity.
Compare: Spread Footings vs. Mat Foundations—both are shallow systems distributing load over area, but mat foundations connect multiple columns into one continuous slab when individual footings would overlap. If an exam question describes closely-spaced columns on marginal soil, mat foundations are your answer.
When surface soils lack adequate bearing capacity or when structures must resist significant lateral forces, foundations extend to competent strata below. The mechanism: transfer loads through shaft friction, end bearing, or both to reach stable soil or bedrock.
Compare: Driven Piles vs. Drilled Shafts—both reach deep strata, but driven piles work best in granular soils where displacement increases density, while drilled shafts excel in rock or cohesive soils and offer better lateral capacity. FRQ tip: if the problem mentions seismic loads or scour, drilled shafts are usually the stronger choice.
Piers and abutments aren't foundation types per se—they're the structural elements that connect the superstructure to the foundation system below. Understanding their function clarifies why different foundations suit different locations.
Compare: Pier Foundations vs. Abutment Foundations—piers primarily handle vertical loads with some lateral (wind, seismic), while abutments must always resist significant horizontal earth pressure. This dual function makes abutment design more complex and often requires larger or deeper foundations.
Building foundations in rivers, lakes, or marine environments requires specialized techniques to manage water during construction. The challenge: create dry conditions at depth while maintaining stability against hydrostatic pressure.
Compare: Cofferdams vs. Pneumatic Caissons—cofferdams create a dry perimeter around the work area and are removed after construction, while pneumatic caissons become the permanent foundation structure. Cofferdams suit shallower water; pneumatic caissons were developed for deep underwater excavation before modern drilling technology.
Foundation classification often comes down to a fundamental question: can we bear on surface soils, or must we go deep? This binary decision drives cost, schedule, and construction methodology.
Compare: Shallow vs. Deep Foundations—the decision hinges on whether adequate bearing capacity exists near the surface. Rule of thumb: if competent soil or rock lies within about 10 feet and loads are moderate, shallow foundations are economical; deeper competent strata or heavy loads push the design toward deep foundations.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Load distribution over area | Spread Footings, Mat Foundations |
| Load transfer to deep strata | Pile Foundations, Drilled Shafts |
| Lateral load resistance | Drilled Shafts, Pier Foundations |
| Earth retention function | Abutment Foundations |
| Limited access/retrofit | Micropile Foundations |
| Water crossing construction | Cofferdams, Pneumatic Caissons |
| Shallow soil conditions | Spread Footings, Shallow Foundations |
| Deep or poor soil conditions | Pile Foundations, Drilled Shafts, Deep Foundations |
A bridge site has soft clay extending 40 feet below grade with dense sand beneath. Which two foundation types would be most appropriate, and what load transfer mechanism would each use?
Compare the functions of pier foundations versus abutment foundations—why does the abutment's dual role affect foundation design?
An FRQ describes a river crossing where the contractor must construct pier foundations in 15 feet of water. What temporary construction method would you specify, and what permanent foundation type might it facilitate?
When would you select micropiles over conventional driven piles? Identify at least two site conditions that favor micropile installation.
A designer must choose between a group of driven piles and a single drilled shaft for a bridge pier in a seismic zone. What advantages does the drilled shaft offer for lateral load resistance, and how does this relate to the shaft's geometry?