Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Blocking isn't just about telling actors where to stand—it's the visual language of storytelling. When you're tested on directing concepts, examiners want to see that you understand why a director places an actor downstage center during a confession, or why two characters standing far apart communicates something different than when they're inches from each other. You're being tested on your ability to translate emotional beats, power dynamics, and narrative arcs into spatial relationships that an audience can read instantly.
The techniques in this guide demonstrate core principles of visual composition, psychological communication, and theatrical convention. Master these concepts, and you'll be able to analyze any production's blocking choices—or defend your own in a practical exam. Don't just memorize the terms; know what each technique accomplishes and when you'd choose one approach over another.
Every blocking decision starts with understanding the stage as a meaningful geography where position equals emphasis.
Compare: Stage Geography vs. Levels—both establish visual hierarchy, but geography works horizontally (who's closer to the audience) while levels work vertically (who's physically higher). Use geography for intimacy/distance; use levels for status/power. FRQ tip: If asked about communicating power dynamics, discuss both.
Directors compose stage pictures the way painters compose canvases—using shape, balance, and arrangement to guide the eye and communicate meaning.
Compare: Triangulation vs. Tableau—triangulation organizes actors for dynamic scenes with ongoing movement, while tableau creates frozen moments of maximum visual impact. Both are compositional tools, but triangulation maintains flow while tableau punctuates it.
In strong blocking, no actor moves without reason—every cross, every gesture, every shift communicates character psychology and narrative purpose.
Compare: Motivated Movement vs. Proxemics—motivated movement explains why a character moves, while proxemics explains what the distance means once they stop. Both require psychological justification. In analysis, discuss the motivation first, then the spatial relationship it creates.
How actors enter, exit, and move between beats shapes the audience's experience of time and dramatic structure.
Compare: Entrances/Exits vs. Traffic Patterns—entrances and exits are the punctuation marks of blocking (beginnings and endings), while traffic patterns govern the flow between those moments. Strong directors plan both: where actors enter/exit and how they navigate once onstage.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Establishing power/status | Levels, Stage Geography, Proxemics |
| Creating visual interest | Triangulation, Composition and Balance, Levels |
| Communicating relationships | Proxemics, Motivated Movement, Picturization |
| Guiding audience focus | Focal Points, Triangulation, Tableau |
| Controlling pacing/rhythm | Traffic Patterns, Entrances and Exits, Motivated Movement |
| Freezing emotional moments | Tableau, Picturization |
| Psychological storytelling | Motivated Movement, Proxemics, Entrances and Exits |
Which two techniques would you combine to show that Character A holds power over Character B without either speaking? Explain your choices.
A director places three actors in a triangular formation, then has one actor break away and cross downstage. What two blocking concepts does this demonstrate, and what might it communicate to the audience?
Compare and contrast proxemics and levels as tools for showing intimacy between characters. When would you choose one over the other?
If an FRQ asks you to analyze how blocking reveals a character's internal conflict, which techniques offer the strongest evidence? Name at least three.
A scene requires high tension but minimal dialogue. How would you use tableau, composition, and traffic patterns together to maintain audience engagement?