Big Bang Theory Evidence

Why This Matters

The Big Bang Theory isn't just a catchy name—it's the foundation of modern cosmology and the framework through which we understand everything from the age of the universe to why galaxies exist at all. When you're tested on this material, you're being asked to demonstrate how multiple independent lines of evidence converge to support a single cosmological model. This is science at its most powerful: predictions made, observations gathered, theory confirmed.

Don't fall into the trap of memorizing these pieces of evidence as isolated facts. Instead, focus on what each piece of evidence actually proves and how different observations connect. The exam will test your ability to explain why the cosmic microwave background matters, how redshift demonstrates expansion, and what primordial nucleosynthesis tells us about conditions in the early universe. Master the mechanisms, and you'll handle any question they throw at you.

---

Evidence from Light and Radiation

The universe communicates its history through electromagnetic radiation. By analyzing light from distant sources—and the radiation that permeates all of space—we can reconstruct conditions billions of years ago. The key principle here is that looking farther into space means looking back in time.

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation

• The CMB is thermal radiation from 380,000 years after the Big Bang—the moment when the universe cooled enough for atoms to form and light to travel freely
• Temperature uniformity of 2.725 K across the sky confirms the universe was once in thermal equilibrium, a hot, dense state predicted by Big Bang theory
• Tiny anisotropies (variations of ~1 part in 100,000) reveal density fluctuations that seeded galaxy formation, providing a direct test of cosmic inflation

Redshift of Distant Galaxies

• Spectral lines from distant galaxies shift toward longer wavelengths—this cosmological redshift indicates space itself is expanding
• Redshift increases with distance, meaning more distant objects are receding faster, exactly as predicted by an expanding universe model
• Redshift measurements enabled the discovery of the accelerating expansion, which led to the dark energy hypothesis and reshaped cosmology

---

Evidence from Motion and Expansion

The dynamic nature of the universe—galaxies moving apart, space stretching—provides some of the most direct evidence that the cosmos had a beginning. These observations transformed our view from a static, eternal universe to one with a definite origin.

Hubble's Law and Universal Expansion

• Velocity equals the Hubble constant times distance: $v = H_0 \times d$—this linear relationship shows expansion is uniform throughout the observable universe
• The Hubble constant ($H_0 \approx 70 \text{ km/s/Mpc}$) allows us to estimate the universe's age by extrapolating backward to when all matter was concentrated
• Hubble's observation in 1929 overturned the static universe model and provided the first observational foundation for Big Bang cosmology

Baryon Acoustic Oscillations

• BAOs are frozen sound waves from the early universe—pressure waves that propagated through the hot plasma before atoms formed
• They create a characteristic scale of ~490 million light-years between galaxy clusters, serving as a cosmic standard ruler for measuring distances
• BAO measurements independently confirm the expansion rate and help constrain dark energy models, making them crucial for precision cosmology

---

Evidence from Matter and Element Formation

The specific chemical composition of the universe tells us about conditions in the first few minutes after the Big Bang. Nuclear physics makes precise predictions about what elements should form—and observations match remarkably well.

Primordial Nucleosynthesis

• The Big Bang produced ~75% hydrogen, ~25% helium, and trace lithium by mass—heavier elements came later from stellar fusion
• These ratios depend on the baryon density and expansion rate during the first 3 minutes, providing a direct probe of early universe conditions
• Observed abundances in pristine gas clouds match predictions to high precision, confirming our understanding of Big Bang physics

Dark Matter and Dark Energy

• Dark matter (~27% of the universe) explains gravitational effects that visible matter alone cannot account for, including galaxy rotation curves and gravitational lensing
• Dark energy (~68% of the universe) drives accelerating expansion—discovered in 1998 through Type Ia supernova observations
• The $\Lambda$CDM model (Lambda-Cold Dark Matter) incorporates both components and successfully describes universe evolution from the Big Bang to today

---

Evidence from Cosmic Structure

The universe isn't randomly arranged—galaxies cluster in specific patterns that reflect both initial conditions and billions of years of gravitational evolution. These structures are fossils of the early universe, shaped by physics we can model and test.

Large-Scale Structure

• Galaxies form a cosmic web of filaments, walls, and voids—this pattern emerged from tiny density fluctuations amplified by gravity over cosmic time
• Computer simulations of structure formation match observations when they include dark matter, dark energy, and initial conditions from the CMB
• The largest structures span hundreds of millions of light-years, yet their statistical properties confirm predictions from inflation and Big Bang cosmology

Cosmic Inflation

• Inflation proposes exponential expansion in the first $10^{-36}$ to $10^{-32}$ seconds—the universe grew by a factor of at least $10^{26}$
• Solves the horizon problem: explains why the CMB temperature is uniform across regions that couldn't have been in causal contact otherwise
• Solves the flatness problem: explains why the universe's geometry is so close to flat, which would otherwise require impossibly fine-tuned initial conditions

---

Evidence from Logical Paradoxes and New Physics

Some evidence for the Big Bang comes not from direct observation but from resolving contradictions that arise in alternative models. These arguments demonstrate that a finite-age, expanding universe is logically necessary.

Olbers' Paradox

• In an infinite, static, eternal universe, the night sky should be blindingly bright—every line of sight would eventually hit a star
• The dark night sky proves the universe is finite in age: light from distant stars hasn't had time to reach us
• Expansion compounds the effect: redshift dims distant starlight, and the observable universe has a finite horizon

Gravitational Waves

• Ripples in spacetime detected by LIGO/Virgo confirm general relativity—the same theory that predicts Big Bang cosmology
• Primordial gravitational waves from inflation (if detected) would provide direct evidence of the universe's first moments
• The 2017 neutron star merger (GW170817) confirmed that heavy elements form in such collisions, complementing our understanding of nucleosynthesis

---

Quick Reference Table

---

Self-Check Questions

1. Which two pieces of evidence both involve analyzing electromagnetic radiation but probe different epochs of cosmic history? Explain what each reveals about the universe.

2. How does primordial nucleosynthesis provide evidence for the Big Bang, and why can't stellar fusion explain the observed helium abundance?

3. Compare and contrast Hubble's Law and baryon acoustic oscillations as methods for measuring cosmic expansion. What advantages does each approach offer?

4. If an FRQ asks you to explain how the CMB supports both the Big Bang and cosmic inflation, what specific features would you discuss?

5. Why does Olbers' Paradox support a finite-age universe, and how does the expansion of space strengthen this argument?