Why This Matters
Every structure you encounter—from the chair you're sitting in to the bridge you drove over this morning—relies on a handful of fundamental elements working together. In engineering, you're being tested on your ability to recognize how these elements transfer loads, why certain shapes and materials are chosen, and what happens when forces move through a structure. Understanding load paths, stress distribution, and the difference between tension and compression will show up repeatedly in analysis problems and design challenges.
Don't just memorize that "beams are horizontal" or "columns are vertical." Instead, focus on what type of stress each element handles, how geometry affects structural efficiency, and why engineers choose one element over another for specific applications. When you can explain the mechanism behind each element's behavior, you'll be ready for any problem they throw at you.
Elements That Handle Bending and Flexure
These elements primarily resist loads through bending moments and shear forces, meaning they experience both tension and compression simultaneously across their cross-sections.
Beams
- Horizontal members that transfer loads to vertical supports—the workhorses of most structural systems, carrying everything from floor loads to roof weight
- Material selection determines capacity: wood offers economy, steel provides high strength-to-weight ratio, and concrete excels in compression with reinforcement for tension
- Configuration affects behavior: simply supported beams allow rotation at ends, cantilevers are fixed at one end only, and continuous beams span multiple supports for greater efficiency
Slabs
- Flat plates that distribute loads across their surface area—essentially wide, shallow beams that create usable floor and ceiling space
- Reinforcement placement is critical: steel bars are positioned near the bottom (tension zone) to compensate for concrete's weakness in tension
- One-way vs. two-way behavior depends on aspect ratio and support conditions—square slabs supported on all sides act two-way, while long rectangular slabs primarily bend in one direction
Compare: Beams vs. Slabs—both resist bending, but beams are linear elements while slabs are planar. If a problem asks about load distribution across a floor area, think slabs; if it's about transferring point loads to columns, think beams.
Elements That Resist Axial Forces
These elements work primarily in pure tension or pure compression along their length, making their analysis more straightforward than bending elements.
Columns
- Vertical members carrying compressive axial loads—they channel weight from above down to the foundation through direct compression
- Buckling is the primary failure mode: slender columns fail by bending sideways before the material crushes, making length-to-width ratio critical
- Proper sizing and placement determine whether a structure stands or collapses—undersized columns are among the most dangerous design errors
Cables
- Flexible elements that carry only tensile forces—they cannot push, only pull, which makes them incredibly efficient for spanning long distances
- High-strength steel wire allows cables to carry enormous loads with minimal cross-sectional area and self-weight
- Sag and tension are inversely related: flatter cables require higher tension forces, while more sag reduces tension but increases vertical clearance needs
Compare: Columns vs. Cables—both handle axial loads, but columns work in compression while cables work in tension. This is why you'll never see a cable standing vertically or a slender column spanning horizontally between towers.
Elements That Use Geometry for Efficiency
These elements achieve structural efficiency through their shape rather than material bulk, distributing forces in ways that minimize bending.
Trusses
- Triangulated frameworks where members carry only axial forces—the triangle is inherently stable because it cannot change shape without changing member lengths
- Members experience pure tension or compression: this eliminates bending, allowing lighter sections than solid beams spanning the same distance
- Versatile configurations (Pratt, Howe, Warren) optimize for different load patterns—understanding which members are in tension vs. compression is a classic exam problem
Arches
- Curved elements that convert vertical loads into compression along their curve—the shape "pushes" forces outward and downward to the supports
- Thrust at supports is the key design challenge: arches push outward horizontally, requiring buttresses, tie rods, or massive foundations to resist
- Efficient material use allows arches to span large distances with relatively thin sections, which is why ancient builders used them extensively before steel was available
Shells
- Thin curved surfaces that carry loads through membrane action—like an eggshell, they derive strength from double curvature rather than thickness
- Loads distribute across the entire surface: this eliminates stress concentrations and allows remarkably thin construction (some concrete shells are only 3-4 inches thick spanning 100+ feet)
- Geometry dictates performance: the mathematical shape (spherical, hyperbolic paraboloid, cylindrical) determines how forces flow and where reinforcement is needed
Compare: Trusses vs. Arches—both use geometry for efficiency, but trusses work through discrete triangulated members while arches work through continuous curved compression. Trusses are easier to analyze (just axial forces), but arches can be more materially efficient for the right span and loading.
Elements That Create Complete Systems
These elements combine or connect other structural components to form functional load-resisting systems.
Frames
- Rigid assemblies of beams and columns with moment-resisting connections—the joints are designed to transfer bending moments, not just shear and axial forces
- Enable open floor plans: because lateral stability comes from frame action, interior walls aren't needed for structural support
- Lateral load resistance requires either rigid connections, diagonal bracing, or shear walls—understanding these three strategies is essential for building design
Foundations
- Interface between structure and ground—they spread concentrated column loads over sufficient soil area to prevent bearing failure or excessive settlement
- Shallow vs. deep selection depends on soil capacity: good soil near the surface allows spread footings, while weak surface soils require piles driven to stronger layers below
- Differential settlement (uneven sinking) causes more structural damage than uniform settlement—foundation design must ensure consistent support across the structure
Joints and Connections
- Transfer points where forces move between elements—often the weakest link in a structural system and a common source of failures
- Connection type affects structural behavior: pinned joints allow rotation (like a door hinge), rigid joints transfer moments, and roller supports allow horizontal movement
- Detailing determines success: even perfectly designed members will fail if connections can't transfer the required forces—always check connection capacity
Compare: Frames vs. Trusses—both create spanning systems, but frames use rigid joints and bending resistance while trusses use pinned joints and axial forces only. Frames are better for buildings needing open space; trusses are more efficient for long-span roofs and bridges.
Quick Reference Table
|
| Bending/Flexure Resistance | Beams, Slabs |
| Pure Compression | Columns, Arches |
| Pure Tension | Cables |
| Geometric Efficiency | Trusses, Arches, Shells |
| Triangulation Principle | Trusses |
| Load Distribution to Ground | Foundations |
| System Integration | Frames, Joints and Connections |
| Thin-Shell Behavior | Shells |
Self-Check Questions
-
Which two elements rely primarily on their curved geometry to achieve structural efficiency, and how do their load-transfer mechanisms differ?
-
A structural element is experiencing both tension on its bottom face and compression on its top face simultaneously. Which category of elements exhibits this behavior, and can you name two examples?
-
Compare and contrast how a truss and a frame resist the same spanning load—what's fundamentally different about the forces in their members?
-
If you're designing a structure on weak surface soil that cannot support spread footings, which foundation type would you specify, and why does this solve the problem?
-
An FRQ asks you to explain why cables are used in suspension bridges but columns are used in buildings. What key principle about axial force direction should your answer emphasize?