Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
In physical sciences, raw data means nothing until you can describe it. Whether you're analyzing radioactive decay counts, measuring reaction times, or comparing material strengths, statistical measures give you the language to communicate what your data actually shows. You're being tested on your ability to choose the right measure for a given situationโknowing when the mean misleads you, why standard deviation matters more than range, and how distribution shape affects your conclusions.
These measures fall into two fundamental categories: central tendency (where's the middle?) and dispersion (how spread out is it?). A third categoryโdistribution shapeโtells you whether your data is symmetric or skewed, which determines which other measures you can trust. Don't just memorize formulas; know when each measure breaks down and what it reveals about your experimental results.
These statistics answer the question: what's a typical value in my data set? Each measure captures "typical" differently, and choosing the wrong one can misrepresent your results entirely.
Compare: Mean vs. Medianโboth locate the "center" of data, but the mean uses all values mathematically while the median uses position only. If an FRQ gives you a skewed distribution and asks for the best central tendency measure, choose median and explain why outliers would distort the mean.
Knowing the center isn't enoughโyou need to quantify how much variation exists. These measures describe whether your data clusters tightly or spreads widely, which directly impacts how confident you can be in your results.
Compare: Range vs. Standard Deviationโrange uses only two data points while standard deviation incorporates every measurement. Standard deviation is almost always preferred because it reflects the actual distribution of your data, not just its extremes.
Compare: Standard Deviation vs. IQRโstandard deviation assumes roughly symmetric data and is sensitive to outliers, while IQR makes no distributional assumptions and ignores extremes. Use IQR when your data is skewed; use standard deviation when it's approximately normal.
These statistics describe how your data is distributed, not just where it centers or how much it spreads. Distribution shape determines which other statistical measures and tests are appropriate.
Compare: Skewness vs. Kurtosisโskewness tells you about asymmetry (left-right balance), while kurtosis tells you about tail weight (outlier frequency). Both describe distribution shape, but they capture completely different features. A distribution can be symmetric (zero skewness) but still have unusual kurtosis.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Central tendency (symmetric data) | Mean |
| Central tendency (skewed data) | Median, Mode |
| Basic spread | Range |
| Spread with units matching data | Standard Deviation |
| Spread for mathematical work | Variance |
| Robust spread measure | IQR, Quartiles |
| Distribution asymmetry | Skewness |
| Outlier tendency | Kurtosis |
You measure the masses of 20 samples, but one sample was contaminated and has an extremely high mass. Which central tendency measure should you report, and why?
Compare and contrast variance and standard deviation. Why do physical scientists typically report standard deviation rather than variance when describing measurement uncertainty?
A data set has a mean of 45 and a median of 52. What does this tell you about the skewness of the distribution, and which measure better represents a "typical" value?
Which two measures of spread are most robust against outliers? Explain why this robustness matters when analyzing experimental data with potential measurement errors.
If an FRQ asks you to describe both the center and spread of a non-symmetric data set, which four statistics would you calculate and report? Justify your choices.