Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Bandaging isn't just about wrapping injuries—it's about understanding why different techniques exist and when to use each one. You're being tested on your ability to match the right bandaging method to the injury type, body location, and treatment goal. Whether you're controlling hemorrhage, immobilizing a fracture, or protecting a wound from contamination, the technique you choose directly impacts patient outcomes.
The key principles here are pressure management, circulation preservation, and anatomical adaptation. Every bandaging decision balances support against restriction, compression against blood flow. Don't just memorize the steps—know what problem each technique solves and why it works better than alternatives for specific situations.
When hemorrhage is the primary concern, bandaging shifts from support to active pressure application. The goal is to compress blood vessels while maintaining tissue viability downstream.
Compare: Pressure bandaging vs. occlusive dressing—both control fluid movement, but pressure bandaging compresses vessels to stop bleeding while occlusive dressings manage air flow in the chest cavity. If asked about penetrating chest trauma, always think occlusive first.
Joints present unique challenges because they require support without complete immobilization. The figure-eight pattern follows anatomical contours to provide stability while preserving functional range.
Compare: Figure-eight vs. sling and swathe—figure-eight allows controlled movement at a single joint, while sling and swathe provides complete immobilization of the entire upper extremity. Choose figure-eight for sprains; choose sling and swathe for fractures or dislocations.
Arms and legs are essentially cylinders, and bandaging them requires techniques that provide uniform compression along the entire length. The key principle is distal-to-proximal application—always start farthest from the heart and work toward it.
Compare: Spiral vs. circular bandaging—spiral covers larger areas efficiently with partial overlap, while circular provides maximum reinforcement in a small zone. Use circular to anchor, then transition to spiral for coverage.
Some body parts don't fit neat categories—they require bandages that conform to irregular shapes while accounting for sensitivity and function.
Compare: Head bandaging vs. hand/foot bandaging—both adapt to irregular anatomy, but head bandaging prioritizes gentle coverage over a sensitive area while hand/foot bandaging must preserve fine motor function. Always leave fingertips visible for circulation monitoring.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Hemorrhage control | Pressure bandaging, occlusive dressing |
| Joint stabilization | Figure-eight, sling and swathe |
| Limb compression | Roller bandage, spiral bandaging |
| Anchoring/small wounds | Circular bandaging |
| Versatile/improvised | Triangular bandage |
| Irregular anatomy | Head bandaging, hand and foot bandaging |
| Chest trauma | Occlusive dressing (three-sided seal) |
| Complete immobilization | Sling and swathe |
Which two bandaging techniques both use a figure-eight pattern, and how do their purposes differ?
You're treating a patient with a deep laceration on the forearm. In what direction should you apply the roller bandage, and why does this direction matter physiologically?
Compare and contrast pressure bandaging for a limb wound versus an occlusive dressing for a chest wound—what principle do they share, and what makes their application fundamentally different?
A patient has an ankle sprain and a fractured humerus. Which bandaging technique would you use for each injury, and what determines your choice?
If an exam question describes a sucking chest wound with progressive respiratory distress after dressing application, what likely went wrong with the bandaging technique, and how should it have been applied?