Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Audience segmentation sits at the heart of strategic communication—it's the difference between shouting into a crowd and having a conversation with someone who actually wants to listen. On the AP exam, you're being tested on your ability to identify which segmentation approach fits which communication goal, how different strategies reveal different audience insights, and why one-size-fits-all messaging fails in modern media environments. Understanding segmentation means understanding that audiences aren't monolithic; they're composed of distinct groups with unique needs, behaviors, and motivations.
The strategies below demonstrate core principles of audience analysis, message targeting, and strategic communication planning. You'll see how segmentation moves from surface-level characteristics (who people are) to deeper psychological and behavioral patterns (why people act). Don't just memorize the names of these strategies—know what type of insight each one provides and when a communicator would choose one approach over another.
These strategies divide audiences based on observable, measurable characteristics—the "who" of your audience. They're often the starting point for segmentation because the data is relatively easy to collect and verify.
Compare: Demographic vs. Generational segmentation—both use age as a factor, but demographic treats age as a static number while generational considers shared cultural experiences and values. If an FRQ asks about targeting young adults, consider whether the question wants surface-level age data or deeper cohort insights.
These approaches dig beneath surface characteristics to understand why audiences make decisions. They reveal the internal drivers that demographic data alone can't capture.
Compare: Psychographic vs. Benefit segmentation—psychographics reveal general values and worldview, while benefit segmentation focuses specifically on what the audience wants from this product or service. Use psychographics for brand positioning, benefit segmentation for specific campaign messaging.
These strategies focus on what audiences actually do—their actions, habits, and patterns of engagement with media and products.
Compare: Behavioral vs. Technographic segmentation—behavioral tracks what audiences do with products, while technographic tracks how they engage with technology and media platforms. Both are action-based, but technographic specifically guides channel and format decisions.
These methods synthesize multiple segmentation types into actionable frameworks for communication planning.
Compare: Firmographic vs. Demographic segmentation—firmographic applies demographic logic to organizations rather than individuals. Both categorize by measurable characteristics, but firmographic accounts for B2B decision-making complexity. Know which context calls for which approach.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Observable characteristics | Demographic, Geographic, Generational |
| Internal motivations | Psychographic, Lifestyle, Benefit |
| Action-based patterns | Behavioral, Technographic |
| B2B applications | Firmographic |
| Synthesis approaches | Persona Development |
| Surface-level data | Demographic, Geographic, Firmographic |
| Deep audience insight | Psychographic, Behavioral, Benefit |
| Channel/format decisions | Technographic, Generational |
Which two segmentation strategies both focus on why audiences make decisions rather than who they are, and how do they differ in scope?
A brand discovers that its customers span multiple age groups and income levels but share a passion for outdoor adventure. Which segmentation approach would be most useful for targeting this audience, and why?
Compare and contrast behavioral and psychographic segmentation. When would you prioritize one over the other in developing a campaign strategy?
An FRQ describes a company struggling to reach Gen Z on traditional media channels. Which two segmentation strategies should inform their revised approach, and what specific insights would each provide?
Why might demographic segmentation alone fail to predict audience response to a values-driven campaign? Which complementary approach would address this limitation?