Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
ASL sentence structures aren't just grammar rules to memorize—they're the foundation of how meaning gets built in a visual language. You're being tested on your ability to recognize why ASL organizes information differently than English, how non-manual markers (facial expressions, body positioning) work alongside signs, and when to use each structure for maximum clarity. Understanding these patterns will help you both produce grammatically correct ASL and comprehend native signers more fluently.
Think of ASL structure as a toolkit: Topic-Comment establishes context, spatial agreement creates visual clarity, and non-manual markers add grammatical meaning that English conveys through word order or tone. Don't just memorize which structure is which—know what each one accomplishes and when you'd choose it over another. That's what separates basic recognition from real communicative competence.
ASL prioritizes setting the scene before delivering the main information. This visual-spatial approach mirrors how we naturally process visual information—background first, then focus.
Compare: Topic-Comment vs. Topicalization—both front-load important information, but Topic-Comment is a default structure while Topicalization is a deliberate emphasis technique. If you're asked about shifting focus mid-conversation, Topicalization is your answer.
These structures handle straightforward statements and mirror some English patterns, making them accessible entry points for learners. However, don't assume ASL always follows English order—flexibility is built into the grammar.
Compare: SVO vs. TSOV—both are declarative structures, but SVO works for context-free statements while TSOV anchors the action in time. Choose TSOV when when matters; choose SVO for simple, present-focused statements.
ASL distinguishes question types through non-manual markers as much as through sign choice. Facial grammar carries grammatical weight that English conveys through word order and intonation.
Compare: Yes/No vs. Wh-Questions—both are interrogative, but they use opposite eyebrow positions (raised vs. furrowed). This is a high-frequency test point: mixing up the non-manual markers changes the grammar entirely.
These structures handle hypotheticals, relationships, and multi-part ideas. Mastering them moves you from basic sentences to sophisticated ASL discourse.
Compare: Conditional Sentences vs. Rhetorical Questions—both use raised eyebrows, but conditionals set up hypotheticals while rhetorical questions set up self-answered explanations. Context and the presence of an "if" concept distinguish them.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Context-first structures | Topic-Comment, TSOV, Topicalization |
| Non-manual markers required | Yes/No Questions, Wh-Questions, Negation, Conditionals |
| Eyebrows raised | Yes/No Questions, Rhetorical Questions, Conditionals, Topic-Comment |
| Eyebrows furrowed | Wh-Questions |
| English-similar order | SVO |
| Emphasis/focus shifting | Topicalization, Topic-Comment |
| Visual-spatial grammar | Spatial Agreement |
| Hypothetical meaning | Conditional Sentences |
Which two structures both use raised eyebrows but serve different grammatical purposes? How would you distinguish them in conversation?
If you wanted to emphasize when something happened before explaining what happened, which structure would you use, and why does ASL prioritize this order?
Compare and contrast Yes/No Questions and Wh-Questions: what non-manual markers distinguish them, and why might ASL use opposite facial expressions for these?
A signer establishes "teacher" on their right and "student" on their left, then signs GIVE moving right-to-left. Who gave what to whom? Which structure makes this clear?
You want to explain why you missed class by posing a question and immediately answering it yourself. Which structure accomplishes this, and what non-manual markers would you use?