Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Agility isn't just about being fast—it's about being fast in the right direction at the right time. When you're tested on agility training in Principles of Strength and Conditioning, you're really being assessed on your understanding of neuromuscular coordination, force production during directional changes, and the transfer of training to sport-specific movement patterns. These concepts show up repeatedly in exam questions because they bridge the gap between raw athleticism and functional performance.
The exercises in this guide each target specific components of agility: acceleration, deceleration, lateral movement, and reactive decision-making. Don't just memorize drill names—know which movement quality each drill develops and why that matters for athletic performance. Understanding the underlying mechanisms will help you answer application questions and design effective training programs.
These exercises emphasize the ability to generate horizontal force quickly, focusing on the stretch-shortening cycle and ground contact mechanics that drive explosive starts and stops.
Compare: Shuttle Runs vs. Pro Agility Shuttle—both train acceleration and deceleration, but the Pro Agility adds a lateral component and is standardized for testing. If an FRQ asks about assessing agility for athlete selection, the 5-10-5 is your go-to example.
These drills train the frontal plane movements and hip abductor/adductor strength essential for cutting, shuffling, and defensive positioning.
Compare: T-Drill vs. Box Drills—both are multidirectional, but the T-Drill follows a fixed pattern ideal for testing, while Box Drills offer more programming flexibility for training. Use T-Drill for assessment, Box Drills for progressive skill development.
These exercises target neuromuscular efficiency and motor unit recruitment patterns, training the nervous system to fire muscles in rapid, precise sequences.
Compare: Ladder Drills vs. Dot Drills—both develop foot speed and coordination, but ladder drills emphasize linear and lateral patterns while dot drills focus on point-to-point accuracy. Ladder drills are better for warm-ups; dot drills excel at building proprioceptive awareness.
These drills incorporate decision-making and perceptual-cognitive demands, bridging the gap between closed-skill practice and open-skill sport performance.
Compare: Cone Drills vs. Illinois Agility Test—cone drills are flexible training tools, while the Illinois test is a standardized assessment. Use cone drills for daily practice and the Illinois test for periodic evaluation. Both develop weaving ability, but only the Illinois provides reliable benchmarking data.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Linear acceleration/deceleration | Shuttle Runs, Pro Agility Shuttle |
| Lateral movement | T-Drill, Box Drills, Zig-Zag Runs |
| Foot speed and coordination | Ladder Drills, Dot Drills |
| Multidirectional patterning | Box Drills, T-Drill, Change of Direction Drills |
| Standardized testing/assessment | Pro Agility Shuttle, Illinois Agility Test, T-Drill |
| Reactive/cognitive integration | Cone Drills, Change of Direction Drills |
| Neuromuscular control | Dot Drills, Ladder Drills |
| Cutting mechanics | Change of Direction Drills, Zig-Zag Runs, Cone Drills |
Which two drills would you select to assess an athlete's lateral movement ability, and what makes each useful for testing versus training?
Compare and contrast Ladder Drills and Dot Drills—what neuromuscular qualities does each emphasize, and when would you program one over the other?
An athlete needs to improve their deceleration mechanics to reduce injury risk. Which drills from this guide would you prioritize, and what physiological adaptations are you targeting?
If you could only use one standardized test to evaluate overall agility for a team sport athlete, which would you choose and why? What limitations would that choice have?
Explain how Change of Direction Drills differ from reactive Cone Drills in terms of cognitive demand and transfer to sport performance. When might closed-skill practice be more appropriate than open-skill training?