Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Voice isn't just a grammar technicality—it's a strategic tool that controls how readers process information. When you choose active or passive voice, you're deciding what deserves the spotlight: the doer of an action or the receiver of it. This distinction affects everything from sentence clarity to persuasive impact, and it's a concept tested across writing sections, rhetorical analysis, and style revision questions.
You're being tested on your ability to recognize when each voice works best and why a writer might choose one over the other. Don't just memorize the formula for converting between voices—understand the rhetorical effect each creates. Can you identify when passive voice obscures responsibility? When it appropriately emphasizes results over actors? Master these patterns, and you'll handle any voice-related question with confidence.
Every voice shift involves the same grammatical swap: the subject and object trade places, and the verb phrase changes to include a form of "to be" plus the past participle. Understanding this mechanics helps you spot passive constructions instantly.
Compare: "The cat chased the mouse" vs. "John wrote the letter"—both follow identical active structure, but notice how dropping the agent works better with the letter (we care about the document) than with the mouse (we'd wonder what chased it). If a revision question asks about removing the "by" phrase, consider whether the agent matters to meaning.
The active-passive transformation applies regardless of tense, but the passive construction grows more complex as tenses become compound. Each tense adds auxiliary verbs while maintaining the past participle.
Compare: "The chef is preparing dinner" vs. "Scientists have discovered a new species"—both transform to passive, but the progressive ("is being prepared") sounds more awkward than the perfect ("has been discovered"). This explains why scientific writing favors passive while recipe writing stays active.
Voice choice isn't random—skilled writers select active or passive based on what they want readers to notice or feel. Rhetorical context determines which voice works best.
Compare: "The teacher graded the exams" vs. "The storm destroyed many houses"—both have clear agents, but passive serves different purposes. Hiding the teacher might seem evasive; hiding the storm might seem compassionate. Context determines whether agent omission helps or hurts.
Certain fields and situations conventionally prefer passive voice because it creates distance, objectivity, or appropriate emphasis on processes over people. Genre expectations often override general "prefer active" advice.
Compare: "The committee is reviewing the proposal" vs. "The police arrested the suspect"—both involve institutional actors, but passive serves different rhetorical purposes. Committee passive sounds bureaucratic; police passive sounds protective or suspenseful. Recognize that the same grammatical structure creates different effects in different contexts.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Basic transformation (subject-object swap) | Cat/mouse, John/letter |
| Progressive tense passive | Chef/dinner, Committee/proposal |
| Future tense passive | Company/results |
| Perfect tense passive | Scientists/species |
| Agent omission strategy | Teacher/exams, John/letter |
| Emphasis on receiver/victim | Storm/houses, Police/suspect |
| Formal/academic convention | Scientists/species, Committee/proposal |
| Attribution and authorship | Shakespeare/play |
Which two examples best illustrate how passive voice can appropriately omit the agent, and why does omission work in those contexts but not others?
Compare the passive constructions in "Dinner is being prepared" and "A new species has been discovered"—what makes one sound more natural than the other in standard usage?
If an FRQ asks you to analyze a writer's choice to use passive voice in a news article about a natural disaster, which example from this guide would provide the best model for your response?
Identify two examples where passive voice serves a professional or conventional purpose rather than just shifting emphasis. What do these contexts have in common?
A revision question shows: "The suspect was arrested." It asks whether adding "by the police" improves or weakens the sentence. Using what you've learned about agent inclusion, what factors should guide your answer?