Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
Active listening isn't just about being polite—it's a strategic communication skill that directly impacts your effectiveness in negotiations, team collaboration, client relationships, and leadership. You're being tested on your ability to recognize how listening behaviors influence information accuracy, relationship building, and professional credibility. Every business communication exam expects you to understand that listening is an active process requiring deliberate techniques, not passive silence.
The skills in this guide demonstrate core principles of feedback loops, noise reduction, and relational communication. When you encounter questions about communication barriers or interpersonal effectiveness, active listening techniques are almost always part of the answer. Don't just memorize what each skill looks like—know why it works and which communication problems it solves.
These techniques communicate engagement before you say a single word. Nonverbal immediacy—the use of behaviors that reduce psychological distance—tells speakers their message matters.
Compare: Maintaining eye contact vs. Managing distractions—both reduce communication barriers, but eye contact addresses relational connection while distraction management addresses environmental noise. FRQs often ask you to identify multiple barrier types in a scenario.
Active listening requires visible proof that information is being received and processed. Feedback closes the communication loop and prevents message distortion.
Compare: Verbal feedback vs. Paraphrasing—verbal feedback keeps the speaker going ("mm-hmm"), while paraphrasing tests understanding. Use feedback during the message, paraphrasing after key points or at the end.
These techniques ensure you receive complete, accurate information. They address the noise and filtering that degrade message quality in the communication process.
Compare: Avoiding interruptions vs. Asking clarifying questions—both improve information quality, but interruption avoidance is passive (holding back) while clarifying questions are active (seeking more). Know when each is appropriate.
These skills address the emotional and relational dimensions of communication. They create psychological safety that encourages honest, complete information sharing.
Compare: Demonstrating empathy vs. Suspending judgment—empathy addresses emotional content (how someone feels), while suspending judgment addresses intellectual content (what someone thinks). Both create safety, but for different types of sharing.
| Concept | Best Examples |
|---|---|
| Nonverbal immediacy | Eye contact, Focusing on speaker, Managing distractions |
| Feedback mechanisms | Verbal/non-verbal feedback, Paraphrasing and summarizing |
| Information accuracy | Avoiding interruptions, Clarifying questions, Taking notes |
| Relational trust | Demonstrating empathy, Suspending judgment |
| Barrier reduction | Managing distractions, Avoiding interruptions |
| Message confirmation | Paraphrasing, Clarifying questions |
| Professional presence | Eye contact, Focusing on speaker, Taking notes |
Which two active listening skills specifically address the feedback component of the communication process, and how do they differ in timing?
A manager notices her team members rarely share concerns in meetings. Which active listening skills would most directly create psychological safety, and why?
Compare and contrast avoiding interruptions and asking clarifying questions—when might these two skills conflict, and how should a skilled listener navigate that tension?
If an FRQ describes a scenario where a salesperson misunderstood a client's needs, which active listening failures most likely occurred? Identify at least two skills that would have prevented the problem.
How do managing distractions and suspending judgment both reduce communication noise, but target different types of noise in the communication model?