Study smarter with Fiveable
Get study guides, practice questions, and cheatsheets for all your subjects. Join 500,000+ students with a 96% pass rate.
The new product development (NPD) process is one of the most heavily tested frameworks in Principles of Marketing because it connects nearly every major concept you've learned—market research, segmentation, positioning, the marketing mix, and customer feedback loops. When you understand this process, you're not just memorizing steps; you're demonstrating how marketers systematically reduce risk while maximizing the chances that a product will succeed in the marketplace.
Exam questions on NPD rarely ask you to simply list the seven steps. Instead, you're being tested on why each step exists, what happens if a company skips one, and how the steps build on each other. Think of this framework as a risk-reduction funnel—each stage filters out bad ideas and refines good ones before the company commits serious resources. Don't just memorize the sequence; know what marketing principle each step demonstrates and be ready to apply them to case scenarios.
The first two steps focus on generating a large pool of possibilities and then ruthlessly narrowing them down. The underlying principle is that innovation requires both divergent thinking (creating options) and convergent thinking (eliminating weak options early).
Compare: Idea Generation vs. Idea Screening—both involve evaluation, but generation prioritizes quantity and creativity while screening prioritizes strategic alignment and feasibility. If an FRQ describes a company with too many failed product launches, look for weaknesses in their screening process.
These steps ensure the company understands what customers actually want before committing to expensive development. The core principle here is market validation—using research to confirm demand before investing in production.
Compare: Concept Testing vs. Test Marketing—concept testing uses descriptions and prototypes to gauge interest, while test marketing uses actual products in real markets. Concept testing is cheaper and earlier; test marketing provides more realistic data but costs more.
Now the company transforms validated concepts into tangible products and tests them under real-world conditions. The principle at work is iterative development—building, testing, and improving before full commitment.
Compare: Product Development vs. Test Marketing—product development focuses on building it right (quality and functionality), while test marketing focuses on selling it right (market response and marketing effectiveness). Both involve testing, but they test different things.
The final step commits full resources to bringing the product to the broader market. The principle here is commercialization risk management—using everything learned in prior stages to maximize launch success.
Compare: Test Marketing vs. Commercialization—test marketing is a controlled experiment with limited risk, while commercialization is full commitment with significant investment. Companies that skip test marketing may face costly failures at the commercialization stage.
| Concept | Best Examples from NPD Steps |
|---|---|
| Market Research Methods | Idea Generation, Concept Testing |
| Strategic Fit Analysis | Idea Screening |
| Segmentation & Targeting | Marketing Strategy Development |
| Positioning & USP | Marketing Strategy Development, Concept Development |
| The Marketing Mix (4 Ps) | Marketing Strategy Development |
| Risk Reduction | Idea Screening, Test Marketing |
| Iterative Improvement | Concept Testing, Product Development, Test Marketing |
| Go-to-Market Execution | Commercialization |
Which two steps both involve gathering customer feedback, and how does the type of feedback differ between them?
A company launches a product that customers don't want. Which step in the NPD process most likely failed, and what should they have done differently?
Compare and contrast Idea Screening and Test Marketing—both filter out bad ideas, but at what point in the process and using what criteria?
If an FRQ asks you to explain how a company can reduce the risk of new product failure, which three steps would you emphasize and why?
A startup skips directly from Idea Generation to Product Development to save time. What specific risks does this create, and which validation steps did they miss?