💃latin american history – 1791 to present review

Military influence in politics

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated August 2025

Definition

Military influence in politics refers to the significant role that military institutions and personnel play in shaping governmental decisions, policies, and actions. This often includes direct involvement in governance through coups, authoritarian regimes, or influence over civilian leadership, especially in regions where democratic institutions are fragile or emerging.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. In many Latin American countries during the 20th century, military influence was prevalent, leading to a series of coups and authoritarian regimes that suppressed democratic governance.
  2. The military often justifies its political role by claiming it can provide stability and security, especially during times of crisis or social unrest.
  3. Transitional democracies in Latin America frequently experience challenges with military influence, as old structures can resist change and attempt to retain power.
  4. Political parties may seek support from the military to strengthen their positions, creating a complex dynamic that can undermine true democratic governance.
  5. The presence of strong military institutions can hinder the development of civilian control and accountability in newly democratizing countries.

Review Questions

  • How has military influence in politics shaped the transitions to democracy in Latin America?
    • Military influence has played a pivotal role in shaping transitions to democracy in Latin America by often acting as both a stabilizing force and an obstacle. During the Cold War era, many countries experienced military coups that disrupted democratic processes. As these nations transitioned back to democracy, the legacy of military involvement often resulted in weak civilian authority and ongoing tensions between military and political leaders.
  • What are the implications of civil-military relations on democratic governance in post-authoritarian regimes?
    • In post-authoritarian regimes, civil-military relations significantly impact democratic governance as they determine how much influence the military retains over political affairs. When militaries maintain strong ties to political elites or exert pressure on elected officials, it undermines civilian control and accountability. Effective civil-military relations are essential for building trust between the military and society, which is crucial for sustaining democracy.
  • Evaluate the long-term consequences of military influence on political stability and democratic institutions in transitioning states.
    • The long-term consequences of military influence on political stability can be profound, often leading to a cycle of instability that affects democratic institutions. In transitioning states where militaries have historically wielded significant power, citizens may remain skeptical of democratic processes due to past experiences with coups and authoritarian rule. This skepticism can result in low voter turnout and diminished civic engagement. Additionally, persistent military influence can create challenges for accountability mechanisms, making it difficult for democracies to fully mature and thrive.