study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Political violence

from class:

US History – 1865 to Present

Definition

Political violence refers to the use of physical force or coercion by individuals or groups to achieve political objectives, often in the context of social conflict, revolution, or state repression. This form of violence can manifest in various ways, such as protests, riots, terrorism, and state-sponsored violence, and is often a reaction to perceived injustices or extreme political polarization.

congrats on reading the definition of political violence. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Political violence has increased in recent years as societal divisions have deepened, reflecting higher levels of social and political polarization.
  2. The rise of social media has transformed how political violence is organized and disseminated, making it easier for groups to mobilize and spread their messages.
  3. Examples of political violence include protests that escalate into riots, armed insurgencies, and targeted assassinations of political figures.
  4. Political violence often arises in response to systemic injustices, such as economic inequality, racial discrimination, and lack of political representation.
  5. Governments sometimes employ state repression to quell dissent, leading to further cycles of violence and unrest as marginalized groups resist suppression.

Review Questions

  • How does political violence serve as a reaction to social and political polarization in contemporary society?
    • Political violence often emerges from deep-seated grievances that arise from social and political polarization. When individuals feel that their voices are not being heard or that they are marginalized within the political system, they may resort to violence as a means of expressing their discontent. This reaction can be seen in various movements where participants believe that peaceful protest alone will not bring about the necessary change.
  • Analyze the relationship between state repression and political violence. How can one lead to the other?
    • State repression often leads to political violence when governments use force to silence dissent or suppress movements advocating for change. When individuals perceive that their rights are being violated and that peaceful methods have failed, they may resort to violent tactics in retaliation. This creates a cycle where increasing repression fuels more intense forms of resistance, leading to escalated conflict and instability within society.
  • Evaluate the effectiveness of non-violent versus violent methods in achieving political goals within polarized societies. What factors influence the success of each approach?
    • The effectiveness of non-violent versus violent methods in achieving political goals can vary significantly based on the context and the nature of the grievances. Non-violent approaches tend to garner broader support from the public and can lead to sustainable change without further destabilizing society. However, when faced with severe oppression or injustice, violent methods may be viewed as necessary by some groups. Factors influencing success include public sentiment, the responsiveness of government institutions, media coverage, and the ability to maintain a cohesive movement amidst polarization.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.