upgrade

🤕torts review

Long-lasting effects

Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025
Written by the Fiveable Content Team • Last updated September 2025

Definition

Long-lasting effects refer to the enduring impact that an event or action can have on an individual's emotional or psychological state. In the context of intentional infliction of emotional distress, these effects can manifest as persistent trauma, anxiety, or depression stemming from extreme or outrageous conduct by another party, resulting in serious harm that lingers over time.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. Long-lasting effects in the context of intentional infliction of emotional distress often require evidence that the distress is severe and debilitating rather than just fleeting feelings of upset.
  2. Courts typically consider whether the behavior that caused the emotional distress was extreme and outrageous in determining liability for long-lasting effects.
  3. The severity of long-lasting effects may be influenced by factors such as the individual's pre-existing mental health conditions and the nature of the conduct they experienced.
  4. Compensation for long-lasting effects may include damages for both economic losses and non-economic harms, like pain and suffering due to ongoing emotional distress.
  5. Proving long-lasting effects can be complex and may involve expert testimony from mental health professionals who can attest to the enduring impact on the victim's life.

Review Questions

  • How do long-lasting effects influence the legal standards for proving intentional infliction of emotional distress?
    • Long-lasting effects significantly influence legal standards because they help establish the severity of emotional distress required for a successful claim. Courts look for evidence that shows the distress experienced is not just temporary but has resulted in sustained psychological harm. This ongoing impact can be crucial in demonstrating that the defendant's actions were extreme and outrageous, thereby warranting liability.
  • In what ways can the assessment of long-lasting effects differ between intentional infliction and negligent infliction of emotional distress cases?
    • The assessment of long-lasting effects differs between these two types of claims primarily in the required proof of intent and behavior. In intentional infliction cases, plaintiffs must demonstrate that the defendant's conduct was not only negligent but also extreme and outrageous, leading to enduring emotional harm. Conversely, negligent infliction cases focus on whether the defendant's careless actions caused emotional distress, without requiring proof of outrageous behavior. This distinction affects how long-lasting effects are evaluated and proven in court.
  • Evaluate the role of expert testimony in cases involving long-lasting effects related to intentional infliction of emotional distress.
    • Expert testimony plays a vital role in establishing the existence and significance of long-lasting effects in cases of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Mental health professionals provide critical insights into how traumatic experiences have led to ongoing psychological issues, helping to substantiate claims made by plaintiffs. Their evaluations can clarify the severity of emotional harm and its implications on a victim's daily life, ultimately influencing jury perceptions and decisions on damages awarded.