Intro to Communication Studies

study guides for every class

that actually explain what's on your next test

Competing Style

from class:

Intro to Communication Studies

Definition

The competing style is a conflict management approach where one party seeks to achieve their own goals at the expense of the other party's needs or interests. This style is characterized by assertiveness and a lack of cooperation, often leading to a win-lose scenario in conflicts. It can be effective in situations that require quick decisions or when a party's rights are being challenged.

congrats on reading the definition of Competing Style. now let's actually learn it.

ok, let's learn stuff

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

  1. The competing style is often seen in competitive environments, such as business negotiations or competitive sports, where the goal is to win.
  2. Using the competing style can lead to short-term gains but may damage long-term relationships between parties if overused.
  3. This style can be particularly useful in emergencies where quick, decisive action is required to address an issue.
  4. Individuals who prefer the competing style may prioritize their own interests and may be perceived as aggressive or domineering.
  5. While the competing style can sometimes be necessary, it is generally more effective when balanced with other styles, like collaboration or accommodation.

Review Questions

  • How does the competing style differ from other conflict management styles like collaboration and accommodation?
    • The competing style is fundamentally different from collaboration and accommodation because it prioritizes one party's goals over others. While collaboration seeks a win-win outcome by working together, and accommodation involves giving in to another party's needs, competing is focused on achieving a decisive victory for oneself. This can create tension and conflict between parties, contrasting sharply with the cooperative nature of collaboration and the self-sacrificing aspect of accommodation.
  • In what scenarios might using a competing style be advantageous, and what potential drawbacks could arise from its use?
    • Using a competing style can be advantageous in scenarios requiring quick decisions, such as during a crisis or when asserting one's rights in a legal dispute. However, potential drawbacks include the risk of alienating others involved in the conflict, damaging relationships, and fostering resentment. If relied upon excessively, this style can lead to ongoing conflicts and a toxic environment where cooperation becomes increasingly difficult.
  • Evaluate the long-term impact of frequently using the competing style on personal and professional relationships.
    • Frequently relying on the competing style can significantly harm personal and professional relationships over time. While it may yield immediate results in specific situations, consistently prioritizing one's own interests can lead to feelings of distrust and resentment among peers or family members. As relationships deteriorate due to perceived aggressiveness or dominance, individuals may find themselves isolated or facing increased conflicts, ultimately undermining their ability to collaborate effectively in future interactions.
© 2024 Fiveable Inc. All rights reserved.
AP® and SAT® are trademarks registered by the College Board, which is not affiliated with, and does not endorse this website.
Glossary
Guides