On-the-record

Definition

On-the-record refers to information provided by a source during an interview that can be quoted and attributed directly to that person. This concept is crucial for transparency and accountability in journalism, allowing reporters to use the source's statements in their stories with full attribution. It establishes a formal agreement between the journalist and the source, ensuring that the information shared can be publicly reported.

5 Must Know Facts For Your Next Test

1. When a source agrees to go on-the-record, they are allowing their name and position to be published alongside their statements.
2. On-the-record information is often considered more credible than off-the-record comments, as it can be traced back directly to the source.
3. Journalists must clarify whether information is on-the-record before quoting a source to avoid misunderstandings later.
4. In high-stakes interviews, sources might choose to go on-the-record to lend authority to their statements or to hold themselves accountable.
5. Understanding the differences between on-the-record and off-the-record is essential for ethical journalism and building trust with sources.

Review Questions

• How does on-the-record information enhance journalistic credibility?
  • On-the-record information enhances journalistic credibility because it provides clear attribution to sources, allowing readers to assess the reliability of the claims made in a story. By using quotes that are on-the-record, journalists demonstrate transparency in their reporting. This practice also fosters accountability for both the journalist and the source, as it ensures that statements can be verified and linked back to an identifiable individual.
• Discuss the importance of establishing whether a statement is on-the-record before conducting an interview.
  • Establishing whether a statement is on-the-record is crucial because it sets clear boundaries for how the information can be used in reporting. If a journalist mistakenly attributes off-the-record comments as on-the-record, it could lead to ethical breaches and damage trust with sources. Furthermore, clarity about on-the-record status helps journalists navigate sensitive topics while maintaining professional standards, ensuring that all parties involved understand how their words will be represented.
• Evaluate how misunderstandings around on-the-record versus off-the-record agreements can affect journalistic integrity and source relationships.
  • Misunderstandings regarding on-the-record versus off-the-record agreements can significantly undermine journalistic integrity and strain relationships with sources. If a journalist reports information believed to be off-the-record as on-the-record, it can lead to loss of trust from the source, who may feel betrayed or misled. This breach not only affects future interactions but also damages the reputation of the journalist and their publication. Ensuring clear communication about these distinctions is vital for preserving ethical standards and fostering lasting, respectful connections with sources.

Related terms

off-the-record:

Information shared by a source that cannot be quoted or attributed, typically used to provide background or context without public disclosure.

attribution: The practice of identifying the source of information or quotes in journalism, which is essential for maintaining credibility and trust with the audience.

background briefing: A conversation with a source where information is provided on background, meaning it can inform the journalist's work but cannot be quoted directly or attributed.